Experiences and perspectives of UK speech and language therapists on telehealth assessment with people living with post-stroke aphasia

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Amanda Comer, Sarah Northcott, Nicholas Behn, Abi Roper, Niamh Devane, Katerina Hilari
{"title":"Experiences and perspectives of UK speech and language therapists on telehealth assessment with people living with post-stroke aphasia","authors":"Amanda Comer,&nbsp;Sarah Northcott,&nbsp;Nicholas Behn,&nbsp;Abi Roper,&nbsp;Niamh Devane,&nbsp;Katerina Hilari","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Stroke care in the UK was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with many services switching to telehealth. Post-pandemic, a UK survey of speech and language therapists (SLTs) working with people with aphasia (PWA) showed the vast majority planned to continue to use telehealth alongside in-person intervention. Telehealth is considered a cost-effective and feasible method of service delivery; however, there is limited evidence to support its use in the assessment of people with post-stroke aphasia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate what barriers and facilitators SLTs experience when administering telehealth assessments to PWA and to explore SLTs’ perspectives on what makes for a positive patient experience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods &amp; Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>Focus groups (dyadic/triadic) were conducted via videoconferencing. Transcripts were analysed using framework analysis. Inclusion criteria for participants were SLTs working in the UK with PWA, with experience of using telehealth assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes &amp; Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 14 SLTs participated across six groups. Seven themes were identified: assessment; technology; factors specific to PWA; factors specific to family, carers and their environment; factors specific to SLTs; benefits of telehealth assessment; and what telehealth would look like in an ideal world. Facilitators to telehealth assessment included good internet connectivity, access to a helper, adapted assessments, preparation and training PWA to use telehealth platforms. Barriers included reduced control over the environment, having a cognitive impairment, aphasia severity, low beliefs in competence using technology and challenges with managing the emotional needs of PWA during telehealth assessment. A strong therapeutic relationship, offering choice and flexibility in assessment administration, promoted a positive patient experience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions &amp; Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides new insights into the current use of telehealth assessment with PWA by SLTs in the UK. Barriers and facilitators identified can support the implementation of telehealth assessment in SLT services. Providing a positive patient experience when using telehealth assessment is important to SLTs, with patient choice a key factor. Further research is indicated to increase the range of standardized assessments for telehealth assessment and investigate the efficacy of a hybrid model approach to service delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on the subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>There is emerging evidence for the use of telehealth assessment as a feasible and appropriate means of service delivery for SLTs. However, little is known about SLTs’ experience of delivering telehealth assessments to PWA.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this paper adds to existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This study identified both the facilitators and barriers experienced by SLTs when using telehealth assessment with PWA. Practical advice and considerations for telehealth administration are provided.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Resources are required for the implementation of SLT telehealth assessments, particularly in training for both PWA and SLTs, assessments designed for telehealth and accessible telehealth platforms. A hybrid approach to assessment could be beneficial for both PWA and clinicians, retaining the advantages with the acknowledgement that telehealth may not be suitable for all.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Stroke care in the UK was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with many services switching to telehealth. Post-pandemic, a UK survey of speech and language therapists (SLTs) working with people with aphasia (PWA) showed the vast majority planned to continue to use telehealth alongside in-person intervention. Telehealth is considered a cost-effective and feasible method of service delivery; however, there is limited evidence to support its use in the assessment of people with post-stroke aphasia.

Aims

To investigate what barriers and facilitators SLTs experience when administering telehealth assessments to PWA and to explore SLTs’ perspectives on what makes for a positive patient experience.

Methods & Procedures

Focus groups (dyadic/triadic) were conducted via videoconferencing. Transcripts were analysed using framework analysis. Inclusion criteria for participants were SLTs working in the UK with PWA, with experience of using telehealth assessment.

Outcomes & Results

A total of 14 SLTs participated across six groups. Seven themes were identified: assessment; technology; factors specific to PWA; factors specific to family, carers and their environment; factors specific to SLTs; benefits of telehealth assessment; and what telehealth would look like in an ideal world. Facilitators to telehealth assessment included good internet connectivity, access to a helper, adapted assessments, preparation and training PWA to use telehealth platforms. Barriers included reduced control over the environment, having a cognitive impairment, aphasia severity, low beliefs in competence using technology and challenges with managing the emotional needs of PWA during telehealth assessment. A strong therapeutic relationship, offering choice and flexibility in assessment administration, promoted a positive patient experience.

Conclusions & Implications

This study provides new insights into the current use of telehealth assessment with PWA by SLTs in the UK. Barriers and facilitators identified can support the implementation of telehealth assessment in SLT services. Providing a positive patient experience when using telehealth assessment is important to SLTs, with patient choice a key factor. Further research is indicated to increase the range of standardized assessments for telehealth assessment and investigate the efficacy of a hybrid model approach to service delivery.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject

  • There is emerging evidence for the use of telehealth assessment as a feasible and appropriate means of service delivery for SLTs. However, little is known about SLTs’ experience of delivering telehealth assessments to PWA.

What this paper adds to existing knowledge

  • This study identified both the facilitators and barriers experienced by SLTs when using telehealth assessment with PWA. Practical advice and considerations for telehealth administration are provided.

What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?

  • Resources are required for the implementation of SLT telehealth assessments, particularly in training for both PWA and SLTs, assessments designed for telehealth and accessible telehealth platforms. A hybrid approach to assessment could be beneficial for both PWA and clinicians, retaining the advantages with the acknowledgement that telehealth may not be suitable for all.

Abstract Image

英国言语和语言治疗师对中风后失语症患者远程健康评估的经验和观点
英国的中风护理受到COVID-19大流行的严重影响,许多服务转向远程医疗。大流行后,英国对与失语症患者(PWA)合作的言语和语言治疗师(slt)进行的一项调查显示,绝大多数人计划继续使用远程医疗和面对面干预。远程保健被认为是一种具有成本效益和可行的服务提供方法;然而,有有限的证据支持其用于评估中风后失语症患者。目的调查在对PWA进行远程医疗评估时,slt遇到的障碍和促进因素,并探讨slt对积极患者体验的看法。方法,通过视频会议进行焦点小组(二/三)。转录本采用框架分析进行分析。参与者的纳入标准是在英国与PWA一起工作并具有使用远程医疗评估经验的slt。结果,结果6组共14名slt参与。确定了七个主题:评价;技术;PWA特有的因素;家庭、照顾者及其环境的具体因素;slt特有的因素;远程保健评估的好处;以及远程医疗在理想世界中的样子。远程保健评估的促进因素包括良好的互联网连接、获得助手、调整评估、准备和培训PWA使用远程保健平台。障碍包括对环境的控制能力下降、有认知障碍、失语严重、对使用技术的能力缺乏信心,以及在远程保健评估期间管理残疾人的情感需求方面存在挑战。强有力的治疗关系,在评估管理中提供选择和灵活性,促进了积极的患者体验。结论,本研究为英国slt目前使用PWA远程医疗评估提供了新的见解。确定的障碍和促进因素可支持在SLT服务中实施远程保健评估。在使用远程医疗评估时为患者提供积极的体验对slt来说很重要,患者选择是一个关键因素。建议进一步开展研究,以扩大远程保健评估的标准化评估范围,并调查混合模式提供服务方法的有效性。这篇论文补充了关于这一问题的已知情况越来越多的证据表明,将远程医疗评估作为slt提供服务的一种可行和适当的手段。然而,slt向PWA提供远程医疗评估的经验鲜为人知。本研究确定了slt在使用PWA进行远程医疗评估时所经历的促进因素和障碍。提供了远程保健管理的实用咨询意见和考虑事项。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?实施特殊服务小组远程保健评估需要资源,特别是在培训特殊服务小组和特殊服务小组、为远程保健和无障碍远程保健平台设计的评估方面。一种混合评估方法可能对PWA和临床医生都有益,在保留优势的同时承认远程保健可能不适合所有人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信