Implementation of a “People-Like-Me” Tool for Personalized Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jeremy Graber, Lauren A. Hinrichs-Kinney, Laura Churchill, Daniel D. Matlock, Andrew Kittelson, Adam Lutz, Michael Bade, Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley
{"title":"Implementation of a “People-Like-Me” Tool for Personalized Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study","authors":"Jeremy Graber,&nbsp;Lauren A. Hinrichs-Kinney,&nbsp;Laura Churchill,&nbsp;Daniel D. Matlock,&nbsp;Andrew Kittelson,&nbsp;Adam Lutz,&nbsp;Michael Bade,&nbsp;Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley","doi":"10.1111/jep.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>While there are numerous tools available to inform if and when to use total knee arthroplasty (TKA), very few tools exist to help guide the recovery period after surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We piloted a decision support tool that promotes a “people-like-me” (PLM) approach to rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The PLM approach encourages person-centered care by “using historical outcomes data from similar (past) patients as a template of what to expect for a new patient”. In this study, we evaluated how successfully the PLM tool was implemented and examined contextual factors that may have influenced its implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two outpatient physical therapy clinics (Clinics A and B) piloted the PLM tool from September 2020 – December 2022. We gathered data related to its implementation from multiple sources including the electronic health record (EHR), the tool itself, and surveys and interviews with patients and clinicians. We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to analyze the data overall and separately by each clinic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, the clinics met most pre-specified implementation targets, but did not use the tool as frequently as intended. Both clinics identified time, technology, and scheduling barriers to using the tool, but Clinic A scored higher in nearly every implementation outcome. Clinic A's success may have been related to its clinicians' higher level of experience, more positive attitudes towards the tool, and more active approach to implementation compared to Clinic B.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The clinics met most of our implementation targets, but Clinic A experienced more success than Clinic B. Future efforts to implement this PLM tool should (1) engage clinicians as active participants in the implementation process, (2) explore whether incorporating treatment recommendations into the PLM tool and/or using alternative training strategies can enhance its ability to alter clinician behavior, (3) integrate the tool within the EHR to complement existing workflows and mitigate implementation barriers, and (4) include randomized controlled trials that evaluate the tool's effectiveness and scalability across diverse clinical settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

While there are numerous tools available to inform if and when to use total knee arthroplasty (TKA), very few tools exist to help guide the recovery period after surgery.

Aims and objectives

We piloted a decision support tool that promotes a “people-like-me” (PLM) approach to rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The PLM approach encourages person-centered care by “using historical outcomes data from similar (past) patients as a template of what to expect for a new patient”. In this study, we evaluated how successfully the PLM tool was implemented and examined contextual factors that may have influenced its implementation.

Methods

Two outpatient physical therapy clinics (Clinics A and B) piloted the PLM tool from September 2020 – December 2022. We gathered data related to its implementation from multiple sources including the electronic health record (EHR), the tool itself, and surveys and interviews with patients and clinicians. We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to analyze the data overall and separately by each clinic.

Results

Overall, the clinics met most pre-specified implementation targets, but did not use the tool as frequently as intended. Both clinics identified time, technology, and scheduling barriers to using the tool, but Clinic A scored higher in nearly every implementation outcome. Clinic A's success may have been related to its clinicians' higher level of experience, more positive attitudes towards the tool, and more active approach to implementation compared to Clinic B.

Conclusions

The clinics met most of our implementation targets, but Clinic A experienced more success than Clinic B. Future efforts to implement this PLM tool should (1) engage clinicians as active participants in the implementation process, (2) explore whether incorporating treatment recommendations into the PLM tool and/or using alternative training strategies can enhance its ability to alter clinician behavior, (3) integrate the tool within the EHR to complement existing workflows and mitigate implementation barriers, and (4) include randomized controlled trials that evaluate the tool's effectiveness and scalability across diverse clinical settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信