Spatial-statistical modeling of deforestation from an ecogeomorphic approach in typical Hyrcanian forests, Northern Iran

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
F. Pourfarrashzadeh, A. Madadi, M. Gharachorlu, S. Asghari Sareskanrood
{"title":"Spatial-statistical modeling of deforestation from an ecogeomorphic approach in typical Hyrcanian forests, Northern Iran","authors":"F. Pourfarrashzadeh,&nbsp;A. Madadi,&nbsp;M. Gharachorlu,&nbsp;S. Asghari Sareskanrood","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-13641-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deforestation is a significant environmental concern of the present century. This issue has received serious attention from global and regional communities due to its relationship with various environmental issues such as climate change, erosion, water quality, and biodiversity. Concerns about deforestation in arid and semi-arid countries, such as Iran, are quite tangible since it confronted with a shortage of forest resources on the one hand and acute issues caused by flood and erosion hazards on the other hand. The Talesh forests in the north of Iran, which are a manifestation of the ancient Hyrcanian forests with huge ecological reserves, is exposed to forest loss due to the expansion of human activities such as agriculture, wood harvesting, livestock grazing, and mining, despite the implementation of watershed management plans and forest conservation. The conservation and restoration of these forest ecosystems necessitate knowledge of the location and rate of deforestation, as well as its driving factors, through a systemic and interdisciplinary approach that has not yet been taken into account. By using an ecogeomorphic approach to model the deforestation event, we attempted to investigate the link between the ecological process of deforestation and geomorphological processes by combining the spatial terrain analysis with the statistical logistic regression. Given the approach in deforestation modeling, we were able to explain the effects of both physical and anthropogenic factors on deforestation only by incorporating physical variables (geomorphology), which can easily be derived from available digital elevation models (DEMs). First, we succeeded in mapping deforestation points in 12 catchments over 32 years using Landsat images acquired in 1991 and 2022 through change detection technique. The results of the assessment of negative changes in forest cover from 1991 to 2022 showed that about 90 km<sup>2</sup> (4.5% of the total area of catchments) has been deforested. The percentage of deforestation area varied from 7.7% in Haviq catchment to 1.8% in Dinachal catchment. We used the spatial logistic regression model to explain the relationship between geomorphological variables and deforestation probability, since the model is the most efficient predictive model to gather a group of independent variables of different natures without the need for their normal distribution. Geomorphologically independent variables included altitude, slope, topographic position index (TPI), northness, eastness, plan curvature, profile curvature, length of slope (LS) factor, slope length, topographic wetness index (TWI), contributing area, distance to stream, and terrain ruggedness index. The results of logistic regression analysis by revealing the direction of multivariate relationships showed that the probability of forest loss is higher in such places: low altitude and valleys, low slopes, divergent flow points, convex surface, downstream section, flat areas with homogeneous, and dry zones with low moisture. In addition, determining the intensity of the relationships between the independent variables and the dependent variable through regression test showed that the variables of slope, altitude, and ruggedness index with coefficients of <i>β</i> equal to − 2.82, − 2.1, and 1.92, respectively, are among the most important variables explaining deforestation. In contrast, the variables of eastness, northness, distance from the river, and slope length with coefficients of <i>β</i> equal to − 0.000017, − 0.000031, and − 0.000124, respectively, were identified as the insignificant variables in explaining the deforestation and were excluded from the final prediction model. Furthermore, the results of evaluating the efficiency of the logistic regression model through pseudo-<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> (0.19) and relative operating characteristic (0.75) statistics indicated a good fit and an acceptable agreement between the actual map and the predictive map of deforestation. However, the use of more accurate and high-quality DEMs with different spatial resolutions was recommended for future studies. Regional, urban, and rural policymakers and planners should pay attention to the geomorphic environments that have a high probability of deforestation based on the results of this study. The need for more care and protection is evident in these areas, and any human interference in them must be done consciously and in accordance with environmental sustainability principles.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-13641-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deforestation is a significant environmental concern of the present century. This issue has received serious attention from global and regional communities due to its relationship with various environmental issues such as climate change, erosion, water quality, and biodiversity. Concerns about deforestation in arid and semi-arid countries, such as Iran, are quite tangible since it confronted with a shortage of forest resources on the one hand and acute issues caused by flood and erosion hazards on the other hand. The Talesh forests in the north of Iran, which are a manifestation of the ancient Hyrcanian forests with huge ecological reserves, is exposed to forest loss due to the expansion of human activities such as agriculture, wood harvesting, livestock grazing, and mining, despite the implementation of watershed management plans and forest conservation. The conservation and restoration of these forest ecosystems necessitate knowledge of the location and rate of deforestation, as well as its driving factors, through a systemic and interdisciplinary approach that has not yet been taken into account. By using an ecogeomorphic approach to model the deforestation event, we attempted to investigate the link between the ecological process of deforestation and geomorphological processes by combining the spatial terrain analysis with the statistical logistic regression. Given the approach in deforestation modeling, we were able to explain the effects of both physical and anthropogenic factors on deforestation only by incorporating physical variables (geomorphology), which can easily be derived from available digital elevation models (DEMs). First, we succeeded in mapping deforestation points in 12 catchments over 32 years using Landsat images acquired in 1991 and 2022 through change detection technique. The results of the assessment of negative changes in forest cover from 1991 to 2022 showed that about 90 km2 (4.5% of the total area of catchments) has been deforested. The percentage of deforestation area varied from 7.7% in Haviq catchment to 1.8% in Dinachal catchment. We used the spatial logistic regression model to explain the relationship between geomorphological variables and deforestation probability, since the model is the most efficient predictive model to gather a group of independent variables of different natures without the need for their normal distribution. Geomorphologically independent variables included altitude, slope, topographic position index (TPI), northness, eastness, plan curvature, profile curvature, length of slope (LS) factor, slope length, topographic wetness index (TWI), contributing area, distance to stream, and terrain ruggedness index. The results of logistic regression analysis by revealing the direction of multivariate relationships showed that the probability of forest loss is higher in such places: low altitude and valleys, low slopes, divergent flow points, convex surface, downstream section, flat areas with homogeneous, and dry zones with low moisture. In addition, determining the intensity of the relationships between the independent variables and the dependent variable through regression test showed that the variables of slope, altitude, and ruggedness index with coefficients of β equal to − 2.82, − 2.1, and 1.92, respectively, are among the most important variables explaining deforestation. In contrast, the variables of eastness, northness, distance from the river, and slope length with coefficients of β equal to − 0.000017, − 0.000031, and − 0.000124, respectively, were identified as the insignificant variables in explaining the deforestation and were excluded from the final prediction model. Furthermore, the results of evaluating the efficiency of the logistic regression model through pseudo-R2 (0.19) and relative operating characteristic (0.75) statistics indicated a good fit and an acceptable agreement between the actual map and the predictive map of deforestation. However, the use of more accurate and high-quality DEMs with different spatial resolutions was recommended for future studies. Regional, urban, and rural policymakers and planners should pay attention to the geomorphic environments that have a high probability of deforestation based on the results of this study. The need for more care and protection is evident in these areas, and any human interference in them must be done consciously and in accordance with environmental sustainability principles.

Graphical Abstract

基于生态地貌学方法的伊朗北部典型海卡尼亚森林森林砍伐的空间统计模型
毁林是本世纪的一个重大环境问题。由于森林砍伐与气候变化、水土流失、水质和生物多样性等各种环境问题的关系,这一问题受到了全球和地区社会的严重关注。伊朗等干旱和半干旱国家一方面面临着森林资源短缺的问题,另一方面又面临着洪水和侵蚀危害造成的严重问题,因此对这些国家毁林问题的担忧是显而易见的。伊朗北部的塔雷什森林是古代希尔卡尼亚森林的一种表现形式,拥有巨大的生态储量,尽管实施了流域管理计划和森林保护,但由于农业、木材采伐、放牧和采矿等人类活动的扩张,这里的森林正面临着消失的危险。要保护和恢复这些森林生态系统,就必须通过系统性和跨学科的方法了解森林砍伐的位置、速度及其驱动因素,而目前还没有考虑到这些因素。通过使用生态地貌方法对毁林事件进行建模,我们尝试将空间地形分析与统计逻辑回归相结合,研究毁林的生态过程与地貌过程之间的联系。鉴于森林砍伐建模的方法,我们只能通过结合物理变量(地貌)来解释物理因素和人为因素对森林砍伐的影响,而物理变量可以很容易地从现有的数字高程模型(DEM)中得出。首先,我们利用 1991 年和 2022 年获取的 Landsat 图像,通过变化检测技术成功绘制了 12 个流域 32 年来的毁林点。对 1991 年至 2022 年森林覆盖负变化的评估结果显示,约有 90 平方公里(占集水区总面积的 4.5%)的森林遭到砍伐。毁林面积的百分比从哈维奇集水区的 7.7% 到迪纳夏尔集水区的 1.8% 不等。我们使用空间逻辑回归模型来解释地貌变量与毁林概率之间的关系,因为该模型是收集一组不同性质的自变量而无需正态分布的最有效预测模型。地貌自变量包括海拔高度、坡度、地形位置指数(TPI)、北高南低、东高西低、平面曲率、剖面曲率、坡长系数(LS)、坡长、地形湿润指数(TWI)、贡献面积、与溪流的距离和地形崎岖指数。通过揭示多元关系的方向进行逻辑回归分析的结果表明,在低海拔和山谷、低坡度、分流点、凸面、下游断面、均质平坦区和低湿度干旱区等地方,森林消失的概率较高。此外,通过回归检验确定自变量与因变量之间关系的强度表明,坡度、海拔和崎岖指数变量的 β 系数分别等于-2.82、-2.1 和 1.92,是解释毁林的最重要变量之一。相比之下,东度、北度、距河流距离和坡长变量的 β 系数分别为 -0.000017、-0.000031 和 -0.000124,被认为是解释毁林的不显著变量,被排除在最终预测模型之外。此外,通过伪 R2(0.19)和相对运算特征(0.75)统计量对逻辑回归模型的效率进行评估的结果表明,实际地图与毁林预测地图之间拟合良好,一致性可以接受。不过,建议在今后的研究中使用不同空间分辨率的更精确、更高质量的 DEM。区域、城市和农村决策者和规划者应根据本研究的结果,关注毁林概率较高的地貌环境。这些地区显然需要更多的关注和保护,人类对这些地区的任何干预都必须有意识地按照环境可持续原则进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信