{"title":"Nonlinear estimation in turbulent channel flows","authors":"Jitong Ding, Simon J. Illingworth","doi":"10.1007/s00162-025-00741-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We design a nonlinear estimator for channel flows at <span>\\(Re_{\\tau }=180\\)</span> and 590. The nonlinear estimator uses a linear estimator structure based on the linearised Navier–Stokes equations and explicitly calculates the nonlinear forcing from the estimated velocities in physical space. The goal is to use limited velocity measurements to predict the velocity field at other locations. We first use the velocities at one wall-normal height to estimate the velocities at other wall-normal heights. The estimation performance is compared among the nonlinear estimator, the linear estimator and the linear estimator augmented with eddy viscosity. At <span>\\(Re_{\\tau }=180\\)</span>, the nonlinear estimator and the linear estimator augmented with eddy viscosity outperform the linear estimator in terms of estimating the velocity magnitudes, structures and energy transfer (production, dissipation and turbulent transport) across the channel height. The limitations of using measurement data at one wall-normal height are discussed. At <span>\\(Re_{\\tau }=590\\)</span>, the nonlinear estimator does not work well with only one measurement plane, whereas the linear estimator augmented with eddy viscosity performs well. The performance of the nonlinear estimator and the linear estimator augmented with eddy viscosity at <span>\\(Re_{\\tau }=590\\)</span> is significantly enhanced by providing multiple measurement planes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":795,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00162-025-00741-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00162-025-00741-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We design a nonlinear estimator for channel flows at \(Re_{\tau }=180\) and 590. The nonlinear estimator uses a linear estimator structure based on the linearised Navier–Stokes equations and explicitly calculates the nonlinear forcing from the estimated velocities in physical space. The goal is to use limited velocity measurements to predict the velocity field at other locations. We first use the velocities at one wall-normal height to estimate the velocities at other wall-normal heights. The estimation performance is compared among the nonlinear estimator, the linear estimator and the linear estimator augmented with eddy viscosity. At \(Re_{\tau }=180\), the nonlinear estimator and the linear estimator augmented with eddy viscosity outperform the linear estimator in terms of estimating the velocity magnitudes, structures and energy transfer (production, dissipation and turbulent transport) across the channel height. The limitations of using measurement data at one wall-normal height are discussed. At \(Re_{\tau }=590\), the nonlinear estimator does not work well with only one measurement plane, whereas the linear estimator augmented with eddy viscosity performs well. The performance of the nonlinear estimator and the linear estimator augmented with eddy viscosity at \(Re_{\tau }=590\) is significantly enhanced by providing multiple measurement planes.
期刊介绍:
Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics provides a forum for the cross fertilization of ideas, tools and techniques across all disciplines in which fluid flow plays a role. The focus is on aspects of fluid dynamics where theory and computation are used to provide insights and data upon which solid physical understanding is revealed. We seek research papers, invited review articles, brief communications, letters and comments addressing flow phenomena of relevance to aeronautical, geophysical, environmental, material, mechanical and life sciences. Papers of a purely algorithmic, experimental or engineering application nature, and papers without significant new physical insights, are outside the scope of this journal. For computational work, authors are responsible for ensuring that any artifacts of discretization and/or implementation are sufficiently controlled such that the numerical results unambiguously support the conclusions drawn. Where appropriate, and to the extent possible, such papers should either include or reference supporting documentation in the form of verification and validation studies.