Clinical outcome and survival of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm with different surgical treatment: A multicenter clinical retrospective study

Cunlong Lu , Zhenlong Han , Hui Gao , Yongke Liu , Long Li , Tuo Shi , Houxin Zhu , Zhaoli Liu , Liangdong Cheng , Yanbing Zhou
{"title":"Clinical outcome and survival of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm with different surgical treatment: A multicenter clinical retrospective study","authors":"Cunlong Lu ,&nbsp;Zhenlong Han ,&nbsp;Hui Gao ,&nbsp;Yongke Liu ,&nbsp;Long Li ,&nbsp;Tuo Shi ,&nbsp;Houxin Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhaoli Liu ,&nbsp;Liangdong Cheng ,&nbsp;Yanbing Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To explore the effects of different surgical strategies on clinical outcome and survival for the low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN), providing evidence support for the best treatment strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and survival outcome of LAMN data between 2013 and 2023 from multicenter, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis model were used for survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>184 patients pathologically diagnosed with LAMN were included. The median age was 59 (50,69) years. All the patients were performed surgery, including simple appendectomy, appendectomy with caecal resection, ileocecectomy and right hemicolectomy (RHC). Compared with extended resection, local resection achieved better short-term outcome. Appendectomy has higher OS rate compared to the RHC with pairwise comparison (97% vs. 79.2%, χ ​= ​11.14, <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age&gt;60 years (hazard radio (HR) ​= ​1.125, 95%CI: 1.051–1.205, <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.01), tumor recurrence (HR ​= ​7.019, 95%CI 2.226–22.135, <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (HR ​= ​6.486, 95%CI 1.897–22.178, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.003) and recurrence risk (HR ​= ​13.303, 95%CI 4.165–42.493, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.002) were independent risk factors for survival of LAMN.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Appendectomy showed favorable short-term outcome and OS rate compared with right hemicolectomy when the tumor is not ruptured and surgical margin is negative. Tumor recurrence, age&gt;60 years, adjuvant chemotherapy and high recurrence risk indicates poor prognosis. Large clinical trials of surgical therapy for LAMN are urgently needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100075"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X25000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To explore the effects of different surgical strategies on clinical outcome and survival for the low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN), providing evidence support for the best treatment strategy.

Materials and methods

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and survival outcome of LAMN data between 2013 and 2023 from multicenter, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis model were used for survival analysis.

Results

184 patients pathologically diagnosed with LAMN were included. The median age was 59 (50,69) years. All the patients were performed surgery, including simple appendectomy, appendectomy with caecal resection, ileocecectomy and right hemicolectomy (RHC). Compared with extended resection, local resection achieved better short-term outcome. Appendectomy has higher OS rate compared to the RHC with pairwise comparison (97% vs. 79.2%, χ ​= ​11.14, P ​< ​0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age>60 years (hazard radio (HR) ​= ​1.125, 95%CI: 1.051–1.205, P ​< ​0.01), tumor recurrence (HR ​= ​7.019, 95%CI 2.226–22.135, P ​< ​0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (HR ​= ​6.486, 95%CI 1.897–22.178, P ​= ​0.003) and recurrence risk (HR ​= ​13.303, 95%CI 4.165–42.493, P ​= ​0.002) were independent risk factors for survival of LAMN.

Conclusion

Appendectomy showed favorable short-term outcome and OS rate compared with right hemicolectomy when the tumor is not ruptured and surgical margin is negative. Tumor recurrence, age>60 years, adjuvant chemotherapy and high recurrence risk indicates poor prognosis. Large clinical trials of surgical therapy for LAMN are urgently needed.
不同手术治疗的低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤的临床结局和生存:一项多中心临床回顾性研究
背景探讨不同手术策略对低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤(LAMN)临床预后和生存的影响,为最佳治疗策略提供证据支持。材料与方法本研究回顾性分析了2013 - 2023年多中心LAMN的临床病理和生存结局,包括术前、术中和术后数据。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归分析模型。结果184例经病理诊断为LAMN的患者入组。中位年龄59岁(50岁,69岁)。所有患者均行手术治疗,包括单纯阑尾切除术、阑尾切除术合并盲肠切除术、回肠切除术和右半结肠切除术(RHC)。与扩大切除相比,局部切除短期疗效更好。两两比较,阑尾切除术的OS率高于RHC (97% vs. 79.2%, χ = 11.14, P <;0.001)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,年龄60岁(HR) = 1.125, 95%CI: 1.051 ~ 1.205, P <;0.01),肿瘤复发(HR = 7.019, 95% ci 2.226 - -22.135, P & lt;0.001)、辅助化疗(HR = 6.486, 95%CI 1.897 ~ 22.178, P = 0.003)和复发风险(HR = 13.303, 95%CI 4.165 ~ 42.493, P = 0.002)是影响LAMN生存的独立危险因素。结论在肿瘤未破裂、切缘阴性的情况下,阑尾切除术较右半结肠切除术具有较好的短期疗效和总生存率。肿瘤复发、年龄60岁、辅助化疗、复发率高提示预后较差。迫切需要对LAMN进行外科治疗的大规模临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信