Treatment algorithm for robotic transplant ureteral stricture repair

Emily Ji, Jonathan Rosenfeld, Devin Boehm, Rebecca Arteaga, Jaewoo Kim, Aidan Raikar, Ziho Lee
{"title":"Treatment algorithm for robotic transplant ureteral stricture repair","authors":"Emily Ji,&nbsp;Jonathan Rosenfeld,&nbsp;Devin Boehm,&nbsp;Rebecca Arteaga,&nbsp;Jaewoo Kim,&nbsp;Aidan Raikar,&nbsp;Ziho Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.urolvj.2025.100327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Surgical repair of transplant ureteral stricture disease can be complex. Patient anatomy and stricture severity can vary widely, thus reconstructive techniques should be catered to individual cases with careful consideration of patient anatomy and stricture characteristics. Here, we describe our treatment algorithm for robotic reconstruction of transplant ureteral strictures.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and surgical procedure</h3><div>In patients with favorable anatomy, where the bladder can be mobilized to healthy ureter or the renal pelvis, our preference is to perform a nontransecting side-to-side anastomosis. Theoretically, a longitudinal ureterotomy should better preserve the fragile ureteral blood supply compared to ureteral transection. This is particularly important in the transplant ureter, where ischemia is often the underlying cause of stricture formation. However, some patients may have a small capacity bladder or fibrosis that prevents sufficient bladder mobilization. In such cases, ureteral transection may be necessary to facilitate additional ureteral mobilization. If the ureteral defect is short, an end-to-end ureterovesical reimplant can be performed. In patients with a longer defect not amenable to a direct reimplant, we perform a Boari flap. In patients where a Boari flap is not advisable, such as in patients with a small bladder capacity or a prior history of pelvic radiation, a transplant to native ureteroureterostomy is another alternative in patients with viable native ureter.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2021–2024, eight total patients underwent robotic transplant ureteral stricture repair at our institution. Two underwent nontransecting side-to-side neoureterocystostomy, 1 pyelovesicostomy, 1 excision and end-to-end neoureterocystostomy, and 4 Boari flap. Median console time was 139 mins (IQR 109–188), estimated blood loss was 25 ml (IQR 25–100), and length of stay was 1 day (IQR 1–3). There was one major (Clavien ≥ III) complication that was an intensive care unit transfer for hypertensive urgency. At a median follow-up of 13 months (IQR 8.5–17), 100 % of patients were surgically successful.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Robotic transplant ureteral stricture repair is a challenging operation. Tailoring reconstructive techniques to patient stricture characteristics in a stepwise fashion allows for a systematic approach that has been associated with excellent outcomes at a median follow-up of 13 months.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":92972,"journal":{"name":"Urology video journal","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology video journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089725000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Surgical repair of transplant ureteral stricture disease can be complex. Patient anatomy and stricture severity can vary widely, thus reconstructive techniques should be catered to individual cases with careful consideration of patient anatomy and stricture characteristics. Here, we describe our treatment algorithm for robotic reconstruction of transplant ureteral strictures.

Patients and surgical procedure

In patients with favorable anatomy, where the bladder can be mobilized to healthy ureter or the renal pelvis, our preference is to perform a nontransecting side-to-side anastomosis. Theoretically, a longitudinal ureterotomy should better preserve the fragile ureteral blood supply compared to ureteral transection. This is particularly important in the transplant ureter, where ischemia is often the underlying cause of stricture formation. However, some patients may have a small capacity bladder or fibrosis that prevents sufficient bladder mobilization. In such cases, ureteral transection may be necessary to facilitate additional ureteral mobilization. If the ureteral defect is short, an end-to-end ureterovesical reimplant can be performed. In patients with a longer defect not amenable to a direct reimplant, we perform a Boari flap. In patients where a Boari flap is not advisable, such as in patients with a small bladder capacity or a prior history of pelvic radiation, a transplant to native ureteroureterostomy is another alternative in patients with viable native ureter.

Results

From 2021–2024, eight total patients underwent robotic transplant ureteral stricture repair at our institution. Two underwent nontransecting side-to-side neoureterocystostomy, 1 pyelovesicostomy, 1 excision and end-to-end neoureterocystostomy, and 4 Boari flap. Median console time was 139 mins (IQR 109–188), estimated blood loss was 25 ml (IQR 25–100), and length of stay was 1 day (IQR 1–3). There was one major (Clavien ≥ III) complication that was an intensive care unit transfer for hypertensive urgency. At a median follow-up of 13 months (IQR 8.5–17), 100 % of patients were surgically successful.

Conclusion

Robotic transplant ureteral stricture repair is a challenging operation. Tailoring reconstructive techniques to patient stricture characteristics in a stepwise fashion allows for a systematic approach that has been associated with excellent outcomes at a median follow-up of 13 months.
输尿管狭窄机器人移植修复的治疗算法
目的移植输尿管狭窄疾病的手术修复可能很复杂。患者的解剖结构和狭窄严重程度千差万别,因此重建技术应针对不同病例,仔细考虑患者的解剖结构和狭窄特点。在此,我们将介绍移植性输尿管狭窄机器人重建的治疗算法。患者和手术过程在解剖结构良好的患者中,如果膀胱可以移动到健康的输尿管或肾盂,我们倾向于进行无交叉的侧对侧吻合。从理论上讲,与输尿管横切相比,纵向输尿管切开术应能更好地保护脆弱的输尿管血供。这一点对于移植输尿管尤为重要,因为缺血往往是输尿管狭窄形成的根本原因。不过,有些患者的膀胱容量较小,或因纤维化而无法充分活动膀胱。在这种情况下,可能需要进行输尿管横断,以促进输尿管的进一步活动。如果输尿管缺损较短,可以进行端对端输尿管膀胱再植。如果患者的输尿管缺损较长,无法进行直接再植,我们则会进行 Boari 皮瓣手术。如果患者的膀胱容量较小或曾接受过盆腔放射治疗等情况下不宜使用 Boari 皮瓣,那么对于原生输尿管存活的患者来说,将输尿管移植到原生输尿管造口术是另一种选择。其中 2 人接受了无切口侧对侧输尿管新膀胱造口术,1 人接受了肾盂造口术,1 人接受了切除术和端对端输尿管新膀胱造口术,4 人接受了 Boari 皮瓣术。中位控制台时间为 139 分钟(IQR 109-188),估计失血量为 25 毫升(IQR 25-100),住院时间为 1 天(IQR 1-3)。有一个主要并发症(Clavien ≥ III)是由于高血压急症而转入重症监护室。中位随访 13 个月(IQR 8.5-17),100% 的患者手术成功。结论机器人移植输尿管狭窄修补术是一项具有挑战性的手术,根据患者的狭窄特点逐步调整修补技术,是一种系统化的方法,在中位随访 13 个月后取得了良好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology video journal
Urology video journal Nephrology, Urology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信