A qualitative inquiry into music consumption at drug treatment centers with and without music therapy sessions – challenges, dangers, and successes

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jeffrey Lozon, Moshe Bensimon
{"title":"A qualitative inquiry into music consumption at drug treatment centers with and without music therapy sessions – challenges, dangers, and successes","authors":"Jeffrey Lozon,&nbsp;Moshe Bensimon","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Music therapy supports individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) in their recovery. Although robust quantitative research exists on the topic, research on subjective experiences of people with SUD is scarce. This qualitative study offers a retrospective perspective on clients with SUD at treatment centers, exploring the impact of music consumption and music therapy on their recovery process, examining the varying experiences of participants from treatment centers providing music therapy and participants from treatment centers not providing music therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This phenomenological study included semi-structured interviews with 23 clients with SUD from treatment centers in Israel. Six participants came from treatment centers providing music therapy. Participants from treatment centers without music therapy consisted of two groups: those from treatment centers with a policy prohibiting all music (<em>n</em> = 4), and those from treatment centers allowing all types of music (<em>n</em> = 13).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Content analysis revealed that at treatment centers providing music therapy, participants completed a 4-stage process: 1) developing awareness of problematic music as a trigger to possible relapse; 2) avoiding problematic music; 3) finding alternative music genres to enjoy; 4) developing tolerance to problematic music. At treatment centers without music therapy and having a policy prohibiting all music, participants developed anxiety towards music, and consequently one person relapsed. At treatment centers not providing music therapy but allowing all types of music, some participants achieved stages 1 to 3, some did not, and two participants relapsed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>At treatment centers providing music therapy, participants completed a four-stage process in which they developed tolerance to problematic music. At treatment centers not providing music therapy, participants failed to develop tolerance and some relapsed. The ability to develop tolerance to musical triggers seems crucial for rehabilitation, as music is fundamental for human life and cannot be completely avoided outside treatment. The current study calls policy makers in the field of treating clients with SUD to incorporate music therapy in treatment programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 209641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Music therapy supports individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) in their recovery. Although robust quantitative research exists on the topic, research on subjective experiences of people with SUD is scarce. This qualitative study offers a retrospective perspective on clients with SUD at treatment centers, exploring the impact of music consumption and music therapy on their recovery process, examining the varying experiences of participants from treatment centers providing music therapy and participants from treatment centers not providing music therapy.

Methods

This phenomenological study included semi-structured interviews with 23 clients with SUD from treatment centers in Israel. Six participants came from treatment centers providing music therapy. Participants from treatment centers without music therapy consisted of two groups: those from treatment centers with a policy prohibiting all music (n = 4), and those from treatment centers allowing all types of music (n = 13).

Results

Content analysis revealed that at treatment centers providing music therapy, participants completed a 4-stage process: 1) developing awareness of problematic music as a trigger to possible relapse; 2) avoiding problematic music; 3) finding alternative music genres to enjoy; 4) developing tolerance to problematic music. At treatment centers without music therapy and having a policy prohibiting all music, participants developed anxiety towards music, and consequently one person relapsed. At treatment centers not providing music therapy but allowing all types of music, some participants achieved stages 1 to 3, some did not, and two participants relapsed.

Conclusions

At treatment centers providing music therapy, participants completed a four-stage process in which they developed tolerance to problematic music. At treatment centers not providing music therapy, participants failed to develop tolerance and some relapsed. The ability to develop tolerance to musical triggers seems crucial for rehabilitation, as music is fundamental for human life and cannot be completely avoided outside treatment. The current study calls policy makers in the field of treating clients with SUD to incorporate music therapy in treatment programs.
在有和没有音乐治疗课程的药物治疗中心对音乐消费的定性调查-挑战,危险和成功。
音乐疗法支持物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的康复。尽管在这一主题上有大量的定量研究,但对SUD患者主观体验的研究却很少。本质性研究对在治疗中心治疗的孤独症患者进行回顾性分析,探讨音乐消费和音乐治疗对其康复过程的影响,研究提供音乐治疗的治疗中心和不提供音乐治疗的治疗中心的参与者的不同经历。方法:本现象学研究包括对23名来自以色列治疗中心的SUD患者进行半结构化访谈。六名参与者来自提供音乐治疗的治疗中心。来自没有音乐治疗的治疗中心的参与者分为两组:一组来自政策禁止所有音乐的治疗中心(n = 4),另一组来自允许所有类型音乐的治疗中心(n = 13)。结果:内容分析显示,在提供音乐治疗的治疗中心,参与者完成了一个4阶段的过程:1)意识到有问题的音乐可能引发复发;2)避免有问题的音乐;3)寻找另类音乐类型;4)培养对问题音乐的容忍度。在没有音乐治疗和禁止所有音乐的治疗中心,参与者对音乐产生了焦虑,结果有一人复发。在不提供音乐治疗但允许所有类型音乐的治疗中心,一些参与者达到了第一到第三阶段,一些没有,两名参与者复发。结论:在提供音乐治疗的治疗中心,参与者完成了一个四个阶段的过程,在这个过程中,他们对有问题的音乐产生了耐受性。在不提供音乐治疗的治疗中心,参与者未能产生耐受性,有些人复发了。培养对音乐诱因的耐受性似乎对康复至关重要,因为音乐是人类生活的基础,不能完全避免外部治疗。目前的研究呼吁政策制定者在治疗患有SUD的客户方面将音乐疗法纳入治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信