Operative Treatment has Greater Expected Value than Nonoperative Treatment for First-Time Patellar Dislocations: A Meta-Analysis and Expected Value Decision Analysis.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Andrew J Recker, Thomas W Mason, Jelle P van der List, Garrett Bullock, Nicholas A Trasolini, Brian R Waterman
{"title":"Operative Treatment has Greater Expected Value than Nonoperative Treatment for First-Time Patellar Dislocations: A Meta-Analysis and Expected Value Decision Analysis.","authors":"Andrew J Recker, Thomas W Mason, Jelle P van der List, Garrett Bullock, Nicholas A Trasolini, Brian R Waterman","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to use expected value decision analysis to determine the optimal treatment for first time patellar dislocations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines and expected-value decision analysis were performed. A decision tree addressing the clinical question (operative vs. non-operative) was created, and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the probability of outcomes after operative versus non operative treatment. 70 patients were assessed regarding potential outcome preferences to a hypothetical injury. An expected-value decision analysis was performed to systematically quantify the clinical decision. Statistical fold back analysis calculated optimal treatment, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effect of changing redislocation rates on the expected value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five participants (mean age 20 years [range 12-33], 58% male, 71% athletes) met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials with 624 patients revealed the probability of a \"well\" outcome was significantly greater for operative treatment (59.3%, 95% CI 53.7% - 64.7%) than nonoperative treatment (44.7%, 95% CI 39.0% - 50.5%). Subsequent redislocation rates with operative treatment were significantly lower (29.8%, 95% CI 24.5% - 35.17%) compared to nonoperative treatment (44.7%, 95% CI 39.0% - 50.5%). MPFL reconstruction showed an 88% probability of a \"well\" outcome, and a 3% redislocation rate. Operative management had a higher chance of a well outcome (RR: 1.43 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.83), p = 0.005). The overall expected value for operative treatment was 6.09 versus 4.96 for nonoperative treatment. Secondary analysis of 27 articles for solely MPFL reconstruction demonstrated an expected value of 7.80 for operative treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meta-analysis demonstrated more frequent favorable outcomes and lower subsequent dislocation rates with operative treatment. Decision analysis based on healthy patient responses to hypothetical scenarios demonstrates that operative treatment has a higher expected value for first time patellar dislocations than non-operative treatment.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, economic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to use expected value decision analysis to determine the optimal treatment for first time patellar dislocations.

Methods: A meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines and expected-value decision analysis were performed. A decision tree addressing the clinical question (operative vs. non-operative) was created, and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the probability of outcomes after operative versus non operative treatment. 70 patients were assessed regarding potential outcome preferences to a hypothetical injury. An expected-value decision analysis was performed to systematically quantify the clinical decision. Statistical fold back analysis calculated optimal treatment, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effect of changing redislocation rates on the expected value.

Results: Forty-five participants (mean age 20 years [range 12-33], 58% male, 71% athletes) met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials with 624 patients revealed the probability of a "well" outcome was significantly greater for operative treatment (59.3%, 95% CI 53.7% - 64.7%) than nonoperative treatment (44.7%, 95% CI 39.0% - 50.5%). Subsequent redislocation rates with operative treatment were significantly lower (29.8%, 95% CI 24.5% - 35.17%) compared to nonoperative treatment (44.7%, 95% CI 39.0% - 50.5%). MPFL reconstruction showed an 88% probability of a "well" outcome, and a 3% redislocation rate. Operative management had a higher chance of a well outcome (RR: 1.43 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.83), p = 0.005). The overall expected value for operative treatment was 6.09 versus 4.96 for nonoperative treatment. Secondary analysis of 27 articles for solely MPFL reconstruction demonstrated an expected value of 7.80 for operative treatment.

Conclusions: Meta-analysis demonstrated more frequent favorable outcomes and lower subsequent dislocation rates with operative treatment. Decision analysis based on healthy patient responses to hypothetical scenarios demonstrates that operative treatment has a higher expected value for first time patellar dislocations than non-operative treatment.

Level of evidence: Level IV, economic study.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信