Performance and Safety of a Sodium Hyaluronate, Xanthan Gum, and Osmoprotectants Ophthalmic Solution in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: An Observational Clinical Investigation.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmology and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s40123-025-01099-x
Mercedes Molero Senosiaín, Barbara Burgos-Blasco, Pilar Perez-García, Álvaro Sánchez-Ventosa, Marta Villalba-González, María Dolores López Pérez, José Carlos Díaz, Vanesa Díaz-Mesa, Alberto Villarrubia Cuadrado, Enrique Artiaga Elordi, Jose Manuel Larrosa Poves, Alejandro Blasco, Antonio Mateo, Claudine Civiale, Laura Bonino, Antonio Cano-Ortiz
{"title":"Performance and Safety of a Sodium Hyaluronate, Xanthan Gum, and Osmoprotectants Ophthalmic Solution in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: An Observational Clinical Investigation.","authors":"Mercedes Molero Senosiaín, Barbara Burgos-Blasco, Pilar Perez-García, Álvaro Sánchez-Ventosa, Marta Villalba-González, María Dolores López Pérez, José Carlos Díaz, Vanesa Díaz-Mesa, Alberto Villarrubia Cuadrado, Enrique Artiaga Elordi, Jose Manuel Larrosa Poves, Alejandro Blasco, Antonio Mateo, Claudine Civiale, Laura Bonino, Antonio Cano-Ortiz","doi":"10.1007/s40123-025-01099-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dry eye disease (DED) is characterized by an imbalance in the tear film, resulting in symptoms such as dryness, redness, and discomfort. The management of DED involves tear supplements, medications, or surgery in severe cases. To evaluate the clinical performance and safety of a hypotonic ophthalmic solution containing sodium hyaluronate 0.2%, xanthan gum 0.2%, and osmoprotectants (glycine and betaine) for treating DED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective, observational clinical investigation included 35 subjects treated with one drop of the ophthalmic solution four times daily. Evaluations were conducted at baseline, on day 14, and at 1 and 3 months. The investigation assessed corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining (NEI score), hyperemia index (Keratograph®), fluorescein tear film break-up time (TFBUT), best-corrected visual acuity, dry eye symptoms (SANDE), and quality of life (DEQS). Safety was monitored through adverse events, intraocular pressure measurements, and the Investigator Global Assessment of Safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects were predominantly female (93.9%), with an average age of 59.9 ± 13.8 years. The ophthalmic solution significantly reduced keratitis lesions with global NEI score decreasing from baseline at 1 month (- 6.67 ± 4.6, p = 0.001) and 3 months (- 7.61 ± 4.0 points; p = 0.001). Conjunctival hyperemia improved significantly after 1 month (- 0.34 ± 0.7 points; p = 0.027), while fluorescein tear film stability increased significantly at 1 (1.85 ± 3.1 s; p = 0.002) and 3 months (1.98 ± 3.4 s; p = 0.001). Symptoms also improved significantly (p = 0.001) at 1 and 3 months (- 29.37 ± 22.2 points and - 26.41 ± 24.0 points, respectively), as did quality of life (- 20.81 ± 15.6 points at 1 month and - 18.43 ± 19.3 points at 3 months; p = 0.001 for both). The safety profile was very good, with no adverse events (only mild ocular discomfort reported in 14.3% of subjects).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ophthalmic solution effectively improved DED symptoms and signs, enhancing patients' quality of life while maintaining a good safety profile.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05778942.</p>","PeriodicalId":19623,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"675-692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01099-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dry eye disease (DED) is characterized by an imbalance in the tear film, resulting in symptoms such as dryness, redness, and discomfort. The management of DED involves tear supplements, medications, or surgery in severe cases. To evaluate the clinical performance and safety of a hypotonic ophthalmic solution containing sodium hyaluronate 0.2%, xanthan gum 0.2%, and osmoprotectants (glycine and betaine) for treating DED.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational clinical investigation included 35 subjects treated with one drop of the ophthalmic solution four times daily. Evaluations were conducted at baseline, on day 14, and at 1 and 3 months. The investigation assessed corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining (NEI score), hyperemia index (Keratograph®), fluorescein tear film break-up time (TFBUT), best-corrected visual acuity, dry eye symptoms (SANDE), and quality of life (DEQS). Safety was monitored through adverse events, intraocular pressure measurements, and the Investigator Global Assessment of Safety.

Results: Subjects were predominantly female (93.9%), with an average age of 59.9 ± 13.8 years. The ophthalmic solution significantly reduced keratitis lesions with global NEI score decreasing from baseline at 1 month (- 6.67 ± 4.6, p = 0.001) and 3 months (- 7.61 ± 4.0 points; p = 0.001). Conjunctival hyperemia improved significantly after 1 month (- 0.34 ± 0.7 points; p = 0.027), while fluorescein tear film stability increased significantly at 1 (1.85 ± 3.1 s; p = 0.002) and 3 months (1.98 ± 3.4 s; p = 0.001). Symptoms also improved significantly (p = 0.001) at 1 and 3 months (- 29.37 ± 22.2 points and - 26.41 ± 24.0 points, respectively), as did quality of life (- 20.81 ± 15.6 points at 1 month and - 18.43 ± 19.3 points at 3 months; p = 0.001 for both). The safety profile was very good, with no adverse events (only mild ocular discomfort reported in 14.3% of subjects).

Conclusions: The ophthalmic solution effectively improved DED symptoms and signs, enhancing patients' quality of life while maintaining a good safety profile.

Trial registration number: NCT05778942.

透明质酸钠、黄原胶和渗透保护剂眼用溶液治疗干眼症的性能和安全性:一项临床观察研究。
简介:干眼病(DED)的特点是泪膜失衡,导致干燥、发红和不适等症状。DED的治疗包括补充泪液、药物或严重病例的手术。评价含0.2%透明质酸钠、0.2%黄原胶、0.2%渗透保护剂(甘氨酸和甜菜碱)的低渗眼液治疗DED的临床疗效和安全性。方法:本研究是一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性临床研究,纳入35例受试者,每日4次,每次一滴。在基线、第14天、1个月和3个月时进行评估。该研究评估了角膜和结膜荧光素染色(NEI评分)、充血指数(Keratograph®)、荧光素泪膜破裂时间(TFBUT)、最佳矫正视力、干眼症状(SANDE)和生活质量(DEQS)。通过不良事件、眼压测量和研究者总体安全性评估来监测安全性。结果:患者以女性为主(93.9%),平均年龄59.9±13.8岁。眼液显著减少角膜炎病变,总体NEI评分在1个月(- 6.67±4.6,p = 0.001)和3个月(- 7.61±4.0分)较基线下降;p = 0.001)。1个月后结膜充血明显改善(- 0.34±0.7分;P = 0.027),而荧光素泪膜稳定性在1(1.85±3.1 s;P = 0.002)和3个月(1.98±3.4 s;p = 0.001)。在1个月和3个月时,症状也显著改善(p = 0.001)(分别为- 29.37±22.2分和- 26.41±24.0分),生活质量也显著改善(1个月时为- 20.81±15.6分,3个月时为- 18.43±19.3分;P = 0.001)。安全性非常好,无不良事件(14.3%的受试者仅报告轻度眼部不适)。结论:眼液有效改善了DED的症状和体征,提高了患者的生活质量,同时保持了良好的安全性。试验注册号:NCT05778942。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ophthalmology and Therapy OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Ophthalmology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed (single-blind), and rapid publication journal. The scope of the journal is broad and will consider all scientifically sound research from preclinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the use of ophthalmological therapies, devices, and surgical techniques. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/series, trial protocols and short communications such as commentaries and editorials. Ophthalmology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. Rapid Publication The journal’s publication timelines aim for a rapid peer review of 2 weeks. If an article is accepted it will be published 3–4 weeks from acceptance. The rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid, efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, fostering the advancement of ophthalmic therapies. Open Access All articles published by Ophthalmology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning authors will always have an editorial contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Ophthalmology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials, and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting during the submission process or at any other point during consideration in one of our journals. Once the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to ensure that the preprint record is updated with a publication reference, including the DOI and a URL link to the published version of the article on the journal website. Please follow the link for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Ophthalmology and Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact christopher.vautrinot@springer.com.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信