Artificial intelligence assessment of tissue-dissection efficiency in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Kei Nakajima, Shin Takenaka, Daichi Kitaguchi, Atsuki Tanaka, Kyoko Ryu, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Yusuke Kinugasa, Masaaki Ito
{"title":"Artificial intelligence assessment of tissue-dissection efficiency in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.","authors":"Kei Nakajima, Shin Takenaka, Daichi Kitaguchi, Atsuki Tanaka, Kyoko Ryu, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Yusuke Kinugasa, Masaaki Ito","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03641-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several surgical-skill assessment tools emphasize the importance of efficient tissue-dissection, whose assessment relies on human judgment and is thus subject to bias. Automated assessment may help solve this problem. This study aimed to verify the feasibility of surgical-skill assessment using a deep learning-based recognition model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used multicenter intraoperative videos of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (sigmoidectomy or high anterior resection) for colorectal cancer obtained from 766 cases across Japan. Three groups with different skill levels were distinguished: high-, intermediate-, and low-skill. We developed a model to recognize tissue dissection by the monopolar device using deep learning-based computer-vision technology. Tissue-dissection time per monopolar device appearance time (efficient-dissection time ratio) was extracted as a quantitative parameter describing efficient dissection. We automatically measured the efficient-dissection time ratio using the recognition model of 8 surgical instruments and tissue-dissection on/off classification model. The efficient-dissection time ratio was compared among groups; the feasibility of distinguishing them was explored using the model. The model-calculated parameters were evaluated to determine whether they could differentiate high-, intermediate-, and low-skill groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tissue-dissection recognition model had an overall accuracy of 0.91. There was a moderate correlation (0.542; 95% confidence interval, 0.288-0.724; P < 0.001) between manually and automatically measured efficient-dissection time ratios. Efficient-dissection time ratios by this model were significantly higher in the high-skill than in intermediate-skill (P = 0.0081) and low-skill (P = 0.0249) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An automated efficient-dissection assessment model using a monopolar device was constructed with a feasible automated skill-assessment method.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03641-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Several surgical-skill assessment tools emphasize the importance of efficient tissue-dissection, whose assessment relies on human judgment and is thus subject to bias. Automated assessment may help solve this problem. This study aimed to verify the feasibility of surgical-skill assessment using a deep learning-based recognition model.

Methods: This retrospective study used multicenter intraoperative videos of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (sigmoidectomy or high anterior resection) for colorectal cancer obtained from 766 cases across Japan. Three groups with different skill levels were distinguished: high-, intermediate-, and low-skill. We developed a model to recognize tissue dissection by the monopolar device using deep learning-based computer-vision technology. Tissue-dissection time per monopolar device appearance time (efficient-dissection time ratio) was extracted as a quantitative parameter describing efficient dissection. We automatically measured the efficient-dissection time ratio using the recognition model of 8 surgical instruments and tissue-dissection on/off classification model. The efficient-dissection time ratio was compared among groups; the feasibility of distinguishing them was explored using the model. The model-calculated parameters were evaluated to determine whether they could differentiate high-, intermediate-, and low-skill groups.

Results: The tissue-dissection recognition model had an overall accuracy of 0.91. There was a moderate correlation (0.542; 95% confidence interval, 0.288-0.724; P < 0.001) between manually and automatically measured efficient-dissection time ratios. Efficient-dissection time ratios by this model were significantly higher in the high-skill than in intermediate-skill (P = 0.0081) and low-skill (P = 0.0249) groups.

Conclusion: An automated efficient-dissection assessment model using a monopolar device was constructed with a feasible automated skill-assessment method.

人工智能评估腹腔镜结直肠手术的组织切除效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信