Experimental and numerical analyses of rock damage behavior and fragmentation mechanism under enlarged hole impact conditions

0 ENERGY & FUELS
Congshan Zhang , Yan Zhao , Ke Gao , Bo Tian , Huilan He , Jiuquan Wang , Junsheng Qin , Qilei Yin
{"title":"Experimental and numerical analyses of rock damage behavior and fragmentation mechanism under enlarged hole impact conditions","authors":"Congshan Zhang ,&nbsp;Yan Zhao ,&nbsp;Ke Gao ,&nbsp;Bo Tian ,&nbsp;Huilan He ,&nbsp;Jiuquan Wang ,&nbsp;Junsheng Qin ,&nbsp;Qilei Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The cluster down-the-hole hammer reverse-circulation drilling technology is an attractive approach for achieving a high rate of penetration (ROP) through the \"small hole drilling, large hole enlarged\" construction method. However, limited research has been conducted on the mechanism of button rock-breaking mechanism under enlarged impact conditions. In this paper, the rock crater morphology, debris size, and debris removal volume of sandstone, limestone, and granite with different ratio (<em>k</em>) of enlarged-hole to pilot-hole diameter were investigated by means of drop hammer impact test under the impact of a nine-button drill bit. Subsequently, a three-dimensional dynamic damage numerical model of button bit-enlarged hole rock based on the plastic damage model was established to investigate the impact stress distribution, damage evolution characteristics, impact depth and other parameters under enlarged hole impact loading. The laboratory tests showed that the limestone has the largest crater projection area, with a maximum impact depth of 1.396 mm at <em>k</em> = 2 and a maximum volume of rock debris removed of 3.925 cm<sup>3</sup>; the granite has the largest volume of debris removal at <em>k</em> = 3; the sandstone has a significantly higher depth of fragmentation than the other two types of rock, and has the largest crater size and volume of rock debris removed at <em>k</em> = 2. Numerical simulation indicated that the enlargement condition is more favorable to concentrate the stress around the borehole wall, resulting in rapid rock fragmentation. Under the enlargement condition, the peak impact force gradually increases with increasing <em>k</em>-value, and the impact depth declines with the increase of <em>k</em>-value. The peak impact force at <em>k</em> = 5 is similar to that of the non-enlargement condition, and the peak impact force will be smaller than that of the non-enlargement condition when it is lower than this enlargement ratio. Well wall damage in granite, limestone and sandstone under enlargement conditions (<em>k</em> = 2–3) is significantly less than in non-enlargement conditions and favors fragmentation of the rock while maintaining the stability of the borehole wall. Although larger reaming ratios <em>k</em> are conducive to rock fragmentation, the fracture effect and time consumption of <em>k</em>-values need to be comprehensively accounted for in practical engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 213778"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025001368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cluster down-the-hole hammer reverse-circulation drilling technology is an attractive approach for achieving a high rate of penetration (ROP) through the "small hole drilling, large hole enlarged" construction method. However, limited research has been conducted on the mechanism of button rock-breaking mechanism under enlarged impact conditions. In this paper, the rock crater morphology, debris size, and debris removal volume of sandstone, limestone, and granite with different ratio (k) of enlarged-hole to pilot-hole diameter were investigated by means of drop hammer impact test under the impact of a nine-button drill bit. Subsequently, a three-dimensional dynamic damage numerical model of button bit-enlarged hole rock based on the plastic damage model was established to investigate the impact stress distribution, damage evolution characteristics, impact depth and other parameters under enlarged hole impact loading. The laboratory tests showed that the limestone has the largest crater projection area, with a maximum impact depth of 1.396 mm at k = 2 and a maximum volume of rock debris removed of 3.925 cm3; the granite has the largest volume of debris removal at k = 3; the sandstone has a significantly higher depth of fragmentation than the other two types of rock, and has the largest crater size and volume of rock debris removed at k = 2. Numerical simulation indicated that the enlargement condition is more favorable to concentrate the stress around the borehole wall, resulting in rapid rock fragmentation. Under the enlargement condition, the peak impact force gradually increases with increasing k-value, and the impact depth declines with the increase of k-value. The peak impact force at k = 5 is similar to that of the non-enlargement condition, and the peak impact force will be smaller than that of the non-enlargement condition when it is lower than this enlargement ratio. Well wall damage in granite, limestone and sandstone under enlargement conditions (k = 2–3) is significantly less than in non-enlargement conditions and favors fragmentation of the rock while maintaining the stability of the borehole wall. Although larger reaming ratios k are conducive to rock fragmentation, the fracture effect and time consumption of k-values need to be comprehensively accounted for in practical engineering.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信