Convergent validity of the functional movement screen regarding stability and joint mobility: A systematic review

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION

JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.02.014

Maria Bhudarally , Rodrigo Martins , Tiago Atalaia , João Abrantes , Pedro Aleixo

{"title":"Convergent validity of the functional movement screen regarding stability and joint mobility: A systematic review","authors":"Maria Bhudarally , Rodrigo Martins , Tiago Atalaia , João Abrantes , Pedro Aleixo","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Functional Movement Screen is a clinical tool that evaluates stability and joint mobility. This systematic review aims to analyze the convergent validity of the Functional Movement Screen regarding stability and joint mobility, i.e., the association between the Functional Movement Screen scores and the results of other tests that evaluate stability and/or joint mobility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Review conducted according to PRISMA Guidelines. The databases MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL Complete, and SportDiscus were accessed. The search included articles published between January 1st<sup>,</sup> 1998 and July 5th<sup>,</sup> 2022. Inclusion criteria for the articles were: peer reviewed conference proceedings abstracts or scientific journals articles that related the Functional Movement Screen scores with the results of other instruments that evaluate stability and/or joint mobility. No restrictions regarding language. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included articles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 718 studies were identified. Only 43 studies were included. All studies presented weak methodological quality. Most studies revealed no significant correlations between the Functional Movement Screen scores and the results of other tests that evaluate stability and joint mobility. Few studies identified high correlations.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>High correlations between FMS scores and the results of other tests are scarce. Most studies revealed no significant correlations. The nonexistence of high correlations might be due to lack of quality of comparison measures. Future research using gold-standard methods is needed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Functional Movement Screen does not appear to have convergent validity regarding the assessment of stability and joint mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 902-918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225000749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Functional Movement Screen is a clinical tool that evaluates stability and joint mobility. This systematic review aims to analyze the convergent validity of the Functional Movement Screen regarding stability and joint mobility, i.e., the association between the Functional Movement Screen scores and the results of other tests that evaluate stability and/or joint mobility.

Methods

Review conducted according to PRISMA Guidelines. The databases MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL Complete, and SportDiscus were accessed. The search included articles published between January 1st^, 1998 and July 5th^, 2022. Inclusion criteria for the articles were: peer reviewed conference proceedings abstracts or scientific journals articles that related the Functional Movement Screen scores with the results of other instruments that evaluate stability and/or joint mobility. No restrictions regarding language. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included articles.

Results

A total of 718 studies were identified. Only 43 studies were included. All studies presented weak methodological quality. Most studies revealed no significant correlations between the Functional Movement Screen scores and the results of other tests that evaluate stability and joint mobility. Few studies identified high correlations.

Discussion

High correlations between FMS scores and the results of other tests are scarce. Most studies revealed no significant correlations. The nonexistence of high correlations might be due to lack of quality of comparison measures. Future research using gold-standard methods is needed.

Conclusion

Functional Movement Screen does not appear to have convergent validity regarding the assessment of stability and joint mobility.

查看原文本刊更多论文

关于稳定性和关节活动度的功能运动筛查的收敛有效性：系统回顾

功能运动筛查是一种评估稳定性和关节活动度的临床工具。本系统综述旨在分析功能运动筛查在稳定性和关节活动度方面的收敛效度，即功能运动筛查得分与评估稳定性和/或关节活动度的其他测试结果之间的关联。方法：根据PRISMA指南进行评价。访问MEDLINE Complete、CINAHL Complete和SportDiscus数据库。搜索包括1998年1月1日至2022年7月5日之间发表的文章。文章的纳入标准是：同行评议的会议论文集摘要或科学期刊文章，这些文章将功能运动筛查评分与其他评估稳定性和/或关节活动度的仪器的结果联系起来。没有语言限制。定量研究质量评估工具用于评价纳入文章的方法学质量。结果共纳入718项研究。仅纳入了43项研究。所有的研究都表现出较弱的方法学质量。大多数研究显示，功能运动筛查评分与其他评估稳定性和关节活动度的测试结果之间没有显著相关性。很少有研究发现高相关性。FMS分数与其他测试结果之间的高相关性很少。大多数研究显示没有显著的相关性。不存在高相关性可能是由于缺乏质量的比较措施。未来需要使用金标准方法进行研究。结论功能运动筛查在评估关节稳定性和关节活动度方面不具有收敛效度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES REHABILITATION-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

133

审稿时长

321 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina