Eyal Hanania , Adi Zehavi-Lenz , Ilya Volovik , Daphna Link-Sourani , Israel Cohen , Moti Freiman
{"title":"MBSS-T1: Model-based subject-specific self-supervised motion correction for robust cardiac T1 mapping","authors":"Eyal Hanania , Adi Zehavi-Lenz , Ilya Volovik , Daphna Link-Sourani , Israel Cohen , Moti Freiman","doi":"10.1016/j.media.2025.103495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiac T1 mapping is a valuable quantitative MRI technique for diagnosing diffuse myocardial diseases. Traditional methods, relying on breath-hold sequences and cardiac triggering based on an ECG signal, face challenges with patient compliance, limiting their effectiveness. Image registration can enable motion-robust cardiac T1 mapping, but inherent intensity differences between time points pose a challenge. We present MBSS-T1, a subject-specific self-supervised model for motion correction in cardiac T1 mapping. Physical constraints, implemented through a loss function comparing synthesized and motion-corrected images, enforce signal decay behavior, while anatomical constraints, applied via a Dice loss, ensure realistic deformations. The unique combination of these constraints results in motion-robust cardiac T1 mapping along the longitudinal relaxation axis. In a 5-fold experiment on a public dataset of 210 patients (STONE sequence) and an internal dataset of 19 patients (MOLLI sequence), MBSS-T1 outperformed baseline deep-learning registration methods. It achieved superior model fitting quality (<span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>: 0.975 vs. 0.941, 0.946 for STONE; 0.987 vs. 0.982, 0.965 for MOLLI free-breathing; 0.994 vs. 0.993, 0.991 for MOLLI breath-hold), anatomical alignment (Dice: 0.89 vs. 0.84, 0.88 for STONE; 0.963 vs. 0.919, 0.851 for MOLLI free-breathing; 0.954 vs. 0.924, 0.871 for MOLLI breath-hold), and visual quality (4.33 vs. 3.38, 3.66 for STONE; 4.1 vs. 3.5, 3.28 for MOLLI free-breathing; 3.79 vs. 3.15, 2.84 for MOLLI breath-hold). MBSS-T1 enables motion-robust T1 mapping for broader patient populations, overcoming challenges such as suboptimal compliance, and facilitates free-breathing cardiac T1 mapping without requiring large annotated datasets. Our code is available at <span><span>https://github.com/TechnionComputationalMRILab/MBSS-T1</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18328,"journal":{"name":"Medical image analysis","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 103495"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical image analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136184152500043X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiac T1 mapping is a valuable quantitative MRI technique for diagnosing diffuse myocardial diseases. Traditional methods, relying on breath-hold sequences and cardiac triggering based on an ECG signal, face challenges with patient compliance, limiting their effectiveness. Image registration can enable motion-robust cardiac T1 mapping, but inherent intensity differences between time points pose a challenge. We present MBSS-T1, a subject-specific self-supervised model for motion correction in cardiac T1 mapping. Physical constraints, implemented through a loss function comparing synthesized and motion-corrected images, enforce signal decay behavior, while anatomical constraints, applied via a Dice loss, ensure realistic deformations. The unique combination of these constraints results in motion-robust cardiac T1 mapping along the longitudinal relaxation axis. In a 5-fold experiment on a public dataset of 210 patients (STONE sequence) and an internal dataset of 19 patients (MOLLI sequence), MBSS-T1 outperformed baseline deep-learning registration methods. It achieved superior model fitting quality (: 0.975 vs. 0.941, 0.946 for STONE; 0.987 vs. 0.982, 0.965 for MOLLI free-breathing; 0.994 vs. 0.993, 0.991 for MOLLI breath-hold), anatomical alignment (Dice: 0.89 vs. 0.84, 0.88 for STONE; 0.963 vs. 0.919, 0.851 for MOLLI free-breathing; 0.954 vs. 0.924, 0.871 for MOLLI breath-hold), and visual quality (4.33 vs. 3.38, 3.66 for STONE; 4.1 vs. 3.5, 3.28 for MOLLI free-breathing; 3.79 vs. 3.15, 2.84 for MOLLI breath-hold). MBSS-T1 enables motion-robust T1 mapping for broader patient populations, overcoming challenges such as suboptimal compliance, and facilitates free-breathing cardiac T1 mapping without requiring large annotated datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/TechnionComputationalMRILab/MBSS-T1.
心脏T1标测是诊断弥漫性心肌疾病的一种有价值的定量MRI技术。传统的方法依赖于屏气序列和基于ECG信号的心脏触发,面临患者依从性的挑战,限制了它们的有效性。图像配准可以实现运动鲁棒心脏T1映射,但时间点之间固有的强度差异构成了挑战。我们提出了MBSS-T1,一种用于心脏T1映射运动校正的受试者自我监督模型。物理约束,通过比较合成和运动校正图像的损失函数实现,强制信号衰减行为,而解剖约束,通过骰子损失应用,确保真实的变形。这些约束的独特组合导致沿纵向松弛轴运动稳健的心脏T1映射。在210名患者的公共数据集(STONE序列)和19名患者的内部数据集(MOLLI序列)的5倍实验中,MBSS-T1优于基线深度学习注册方法。获得了较好的模型拟合质量(R2: 0.975 vs. 0.941, STONE为0.946;0.987比0.982,0.965;0.994比0.993,0.991的MOLLI屏气),解剖对齐(骰子:0.89比0.84,0.88的STONE;0.963比0.919,0.851;0.954 vs. 0.924, 0.871),视觉质量(4.33 vs. 3.38, 3.66;4.1 vs. 3.5, MOLLI自由呼吸3.28;3.79 vs. 3.15, MOLLI屏气2.84)。MBSS-T1为更广泛的患者群体提供了运动鲁棒T1映射,克服了诸如次优顺应性等挑战,并促进了自由呼吸心脏T1映射,而无需大型带注解的数据集。我们的代码可在https://github.com/TechnionComputationalMRILab/MBSS-T1上获得。
期刊介绍:
Medical Image Analysis serves as a platform for sharing new research findings in the realm of medical and biological image analysis, with a focus on applications of computer vision, virtual reality, and robotics to biomedical imaging challenges. The journal prioritizes the publication of high-quality, original papers contributing to the fundamental science of processing, analyzing, and utilizing medical and biological images. It welcomes approaches utilizing biomedical image datasets across all spatial scales, from molecular/cellular imaging to tissue/organ imaging.