{"title":"Expert-level policy style measurement via knowledge distillation with large language model collaboration","authors":"Yujie Zhang , Biao Huang , Weikang Yuan , Zhuoren Jiang , Longsheng Peng , Shuai Chen , Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policy style is a crucial concept in policy science that reflects persistent patterns in the policy process across different governance settings. Despite its importance, policy style measurement faces issues of complexity, subjectivity, data sparseness, and computational cost. To overcome these obstacles, we propose <strong>KOALA</strong>, a novel <strong><u>K</u></strong>n<strong><u>O</u></strong>wledge distillation framework based on large l<strong><u>A</u></strong>nguage mode<strong><u>L</u></strong> coll<strong><u>A</u></strong>boration. It transforms the weak scoring abilities of LLMs into a pairwise ranking problem, employs a small set of expert-annotated samples for non-parametric learning, and utilizes knowledge distillation to transfer insights from LLMs to a smaller, more efficient model. The framework incorporates multiple LLM-based agents (Prompter, Ranker, and Analyst) collaborating to comprehend complex measurement standards and self-explain policy style definitions. We validate KOALA on 4,572 Chinese government work reports (1954–2019) from central, provincial, and municipal levels, with a focus on the imposition dimension of policy style. Extensive experiments demonstrate KOALA’s effectiveness in measuring the intensity of policy style, highlighting its superiority over state-of-the-art methods. While GPT-4 achieves only 66% accuracy in pairwise ranking of policy styles, KOALA, despite being based on GPT-3.5, achieves a remarkable 85% accuracy, highlighting significant performance improvement. This framework offers a transferable approach for quantifying complex social science concepts in textual data, bridging computational techniques with social science research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 4","pages":"Article 104090"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325000329","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Policy style is a crucial concept in policy science that reflects persistent patterns in the policy process across different governance settings. Despite its importance, policy style measurement faces issues of complexity, subjectivity, data sparseness, and computational cost. To overcome these obstacles, we propose KOALA, a novel KnOwledge distillation framework based on large lAnguage modeL collAboration. It transforms the weak scoring abilities of LLMs into a pairwise ranking problem, employs a small set of expert-annotated samples for non-parametric learning, and utilizes knowledge distillation to transfer insights from LLMs to a smaller, more efficient model. The framework incorporates multiple LLM-based agents (Prompter, Ranker, and Analyst) collaborating to comprehend complex measurement standards and self-explain policy style definitions. We validate KOALA on 4,572 Chinese government work reports (1954–2019) from central, provincial, and municipal levels, with a focus on the imposition dimension of policy style. Extensive experiments demonstrate KOALA’s effectiveness in measuring the intensity of policy style, highlighting its superiority over state-of-the-art methods. While GPT-4 achieves only 66% accuracy in pairwise ranking of policy styles, KOALA, despite being based on GPT-3.5, achieves a remarkable 85% accuracy, highlighting significant performance improvement. This framework offers a transferable approach for quantifying complex social science concepts in textual data, bridging computational techniques with social science research.
期刊介绍:
Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing.
We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.