Outcomes for the shoulder and elbow following surgical reconstruction for traumatic brachial plexus injury in patients over 60 years.

Kota Hayashi, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, David Chwei-Chin Chuang
{"title":"Outcomes for the shoulder and elbow following surgical reconstruction for traumatic brachial plexus injury in patients over 60 years.","authors":"Kota Hayashi, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, David Chwei-Chin Chuang","doi":"10.1177/17531934251319335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to investigate surgical outcomes in elderly patients aged over 60 years old, with brachial plexus injury, undergoing nerve reconstruction using nerve grafts and/or nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow function. Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Postoperative median shoulder abduction was 35° in the single nerve transfer group (<i>n</i> = 12) and less than 20° in the single nerve grafting group (<i>n</i> = 2). Patients over 65 tended to have poorer outcomes. For elbow flexion strength, a higher proportion of patients in the nerve transfer group (11/12 cases) achieved M3 or greater elbow flexion compared with the nerve grafting group (3/7 cases). Elbow extension also improved in the reconstructive group (9/13 cases). Given these findings, elbow flexion reconstruction is the first priority, while shoulder abduction, showing poor results, should not consume excessive neurotizers. Elbow extension is the second priority, achievable through nerve reconstruction.<b>Level of evidence:</b> IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"17531934251319335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251319335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate surgical outcomes in elderly patients aged over 60 years old, with brachial plexus injury, undergoing nerve reconstruction using nerve grafts and/or nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow function. Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Postoperative median shoulder abduction was 35° in the single nerve transfer group (n = 12) and less than 20° in the single nerve grafting group (n = 2). Patients over 65 tended to have poorer outcomes. For elbow flexion strength, a higher proportion of patients in the nerve transfer group (11/12 cases) achieved M3 or greater elbow flexion compared with the nerve grafting group (3/7 cases). Elbow extension also improved in the reconstructive group (9/13 cases). Given these findings, elbow flexion reconstruction is the first priority, while shoulder abduction, showing poor results, should not consume excessive neurotizers. Elbow extension is the second priority, achievable through nerve reconstruction.Level of evidence: IV.

本研究旨在调查 60 岁以上臂丛神经损伤的老年患者为恢复肩部和肘部功能而接受神经移植和/或神经转移术进行神经重建的手术效果。22名患者符合纳入标准。单一神经转移组(12 人)术后肩关节正中外展为 35°,单一神经移植组(2 人)术后肩关节正中外展小于 20°。65 岁以上患者的治疗效果较差。在肘关节屈曲力量方面,与神经移植组(3/7 例)相比,神经移植组(11/12 例)中达到 M3 或以上肘关节屈曲力量的患者比例更高。重建组患者(9/13 例)的肘关节伸展能力也有所改善。鉴于这些研究结果,肘关节屈曲重建是首要任务,而肩关节外展重建效果不佳,不应使用过多的神经移植器。肘关节伸展是第二优先事项,可通过神经重建实现:证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信