Understanding and addressing factors affecting carers' mental health during end-of-life caregiving: synopsis of meta synthesis of literature and stakeholder collaboration.

Gunn Grande, Christine Rowland, Tracey Shield, Kerin Bayliss, Jackie Flynn, Danielle Harris, Alison Wearden, Morag Farquhar, Maria Panagioti, Alexander Hodkinson, Margaret Booth, David Cotterill, Lesley Goodburn, Cedric Knipe, Penny Bee
{"title":"Understanding and addressing factors affecting carers' mental health during end-of-life caregiving: synopsis of meta synthesis of literature and stakeholder collaboration.","authors":"Gunn Grande, Christine Rowland, Tracey Shield, Kerin Bayliss, Jackie Flynn, Danielle Harris, Alison Wearden, Morag Farquhar, Maria Panagioti, Alexander Hodkinson, Margaret Booth, David Cotterill, Lesley Goodburn, Cedric Knipe, Penny Bee","doi":"10.3310/RTHW8493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family carers provide crucial support to patients nearing end of life. This can affect carers' own mental health negatively. It is important to understand what factors may affect carers' mental health and convey this information to stakeholders who can effect change. We conducted reviews of the qualitative, observational and intervention carer literature and worked with carer advisors and other stakeholders to make findings useful and accessible.</p><p><strong>Aim of the synopsis: </strong>To provide a synopsis of (1) project methods, (2) findings and implications from the evidence syntheses, (3) outcomes of our carer Review Advisory Panel collaboration and (4) feedback from wider stakeholder consultation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Searches of MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycInfo, Social Sciences Citation Index, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects 1 January 2009-24 November 2019. Studies included adult family carers for adult patients at the end of life cared for at home, considering any factor related to carer mental health. Collaboration with the Review Advisory Panel over nine meetings helped map review findings into a framework, shape their presentation and create Review Advisory Panel recommendations. Four workshops, two discussion groups and a survey with stakeholders (carers/patients, practitioners and policy-makers/commissioners) informed output formats and suggested actions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one qualitative, 60 observational, 12 intervention and 3 mixed-methods studies were identified. Factors associated with carer mental health were: (1) patient condition, mainly psychological symptoms and quality of life; (2) impact of caring responsibilities, mainly life changes, workload and carer burden; (3) relationships, particularly carer-patient; (4) finances, whether sufficient; (5) internal processes, particularly self-efficacy; (6) support, particularly adequacy and quality; and (7) contextual factors, mainly age and gender. The Review Advisory Panel comprised five carers and a carer chair. They created recommendations for supporting carers based on syntheses findings, including: awareness raising for carers and practitioners; a road map to help carers navigate caregiving; bespoke carer support through carer assessment; assessment of patient's actual rather than 'managed' needs; co-ordinated care through a single contact point; addressing basic practical needs. Other key recommendations included holistic, co-ordinated patient care and cover of basic carer financial needs. Thirty-six stakeholders participated in workshops and discussion groups and 43 in the survey, to review synthesis findings and Review Advisory Panel recommendations. Stakeholders generally valued the qualitative evidence and recommendations over the quantitative evidence, although all outputs resonated with them. There was little consensus regarding where responsibility for carers may lie, pointing to a need for bespoke carer support roles. Some issues may require systemic-level changes.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Findings are from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development country English-language publications on adult carers and patients within home care, and carer advisors and stakeholders were based in the United Kingdom, which may limit the transferability of findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide some clear indicators of factors affecting carer mental health and recommendations. Improvements may require investment in bespoke carer support roles (e.g. carer support nurses) and systemic change (e.g. improving carer identification and assessment, and financial security). Given the enormous contribution carers make to health and social care, they deserve such investment to support them in their work.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number 18/01/01.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/RTHW8493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family carers provide crucial support to patients nearing end of life. This can affect carers' own mental health negatively. It is important to understand what factors may affect carers' mental health and convey this information to stakeholders who can effect change. We conducted reviews of the qualitative, observational and intervention carer literature and worked with carer advisors and other stakeholders to make findings useful and accessible.

Aim of the synopsis: To provide a synopsis of (1) project methods, (2) findings and implications from the evidence syntheses, (3) outcomes of our carer Review Advisory Panel collaboration and (4) feedback from wider stakeholder consultation.

Method: Searches of MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycInfo, Social Sciences Citation Index, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects 1 January 2009-24 November 2019. Studies included adult family carers for adult patients at the end of life cared for at home, considering any factor related to carer mental health. Collaboration with the Review Advisory Panel over nine meetings helped map review findings into a framework, shape their presentation and create Review Advisory Panel recommendations. Four workshops, two discussion groups and a survey with stakeholders (carers/patients, practitioners and policy-makers/commissioners) informed output formats and suggested actions.

Results: Thirty-one qualitative, 60 observational, 12 intervention and 3 mixed-methods studies were identified. Factors associated with carer mental health were: (1) patient condition, mainly psychological symptoms and quality of life; (2) impact of caring responsibilities, mainly life changes, workload and carer burden; (3) relationships, particularly carer-patient; (4) finances, whether sufficient; (5) internal processes, particularly self-efficacy; (6) support, particularly adequacy and quality; and (7) contextual factors, mainly age and gender. The Review Advisory Panel comprised five carers and a carer chair. They created recommendations for supporting carers based on syntheses findings, including: awareness raising for carers and practitioners; a road map to help carers navigate caregiving; bespoke carer support through carer assessment; assessment of patient's actual rather than 'managed' needs; co-ordinated care through a single contact point; addressing basic practical needs. Other key recommendations included holistic, co-ordinated patient care and cover of basic carer financial needs. Thirty-six stakeholders participated in workshops and discussion groups and 43 in the survey, to review synthesis findings and Review Advisory Panel recommendations. Stakeholders generally valued the qualitative evidence and recommendations over the quantitative evidence, although all outputs resonated with them. There was little consensus regarding where responsibility for carers may lie, pointing to a need for bespoke carer support roles. Some issues may require systemic-level changes.

Limitations: Findings are from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development country English-language publications on adult carers and patients within home care, and carer advisors and stakeholders were based in the United Kingdom, which may limit the transferability of findings.

Conclusions: Findings provide some clear indicators of factors affecting carer mental health and recommendations. Improvements may require investment in bespoke carer support roles (e.g. carer support nurses) and systemic change (e.g. improving carer identification and assessment, and financial security). Given the enormous contribution carers make to health and social care, they deserve such investment to support them in their work.

Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number 18/01/01.

理解和解决临终关怀过程中影响照护者心理健康的因素:文献综合与利益相关者协作的综述。
背景:家庭护理人员为接近生命终点的患者提供至关重要的支持。这可能会对护理人员自身的心理健康产生负面影响。重要的是要了解哪些因素可能影响护理人员的心理健康,并将这些信息传达给可以影响改变的利益相关者。我们对定性、观察性和干预性护理文献进行了回顾,并与护理顾问和其他利益相关者合作,使研究结果有用且易于获取。摘要的目的:提供(1)项目方法的摘要,(2)证据综合的发现和影响,(3)我们的护理评估咨询小组合作的结果,(4)更广泛的利益相关者咨询的反馈。方法:检索MEDLINE、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、PsycInfo、社会科学引文索引、EMBASE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和2009年1月1日至2019年11月24日疗效评价摘要数据库。研究包括成年家庭照顾者在家中照顾生命末期的成年患者,考虑到与照顾者心理健康相关的任何因素。与审查咨询小组在九次会议上的合作有助于将审查结果纳入一个框架,形成其陈述并提出审查咨询小组的建议。四个讲习班、两个讨论小组和与利益攸关方(护理人员/患者、从业人员和决策者/专员)的调查,为输出格式和建议的行动提供了信息。结果:定性研究31项,观察研究60项,干预研究12项,混合方法研究3项。与护理人员心理健康相关的因素有:(1)患者状况,主要是心理症状和生活质量;(2)照顾责任的影响,主要是生活变化、工作量和照顾者负担;(3)关系,特别是护患关系;(四)资金是否充足;(5)内部过程,尤其是自我效能;(6)支持,特别是充足性和质量;(7)语境因素,主要是年龄和性别。检讨谘询小组由五名护理员和一名护理员主席组成。他们根据综合调查结果提出了支持护理人员的建议,包括:提高护理人员和从业人员的认识;帮助护理人员指导护理工作的路线图;透过照顾者评估,为照顾者提供定制支援;评估患者的实际需求,而不是“管理”需求;通过单一接触点协调护理;解决基本实际需求。其他主要建议包括全面、协调的病人护理和照顾基本护理人员的经济需要。36个利益攸关方参加了讲习班和讨论小组,43个利益攸关方参加了调查,以审查综合调查结果和审查咨询小组的建议。利益攸关方普遍认为定性证据和建议比定量证据更重要,尽管所有产出都与他们产生了共鸣。关于照顾者的责任在哪里,人们几乎没有达成共识,这表明需要定制照顾者支持角色。有些问题可能需要系统级别的更改。局限性:研究结果来自经济合作与发展组织国家关于成人护理人员和家庭护理患者的英语出版物,护理顾问和利益相关者位于英国,这可能限制了研究结果的可转移性。结论:研究结果为护理人员心理健康的影响因素提供了一些明确的指标和建议。改进可能需要投资于定制的护理人员支持角色(例如护理人员支持护士)和系统性变革(例如改进护理人员识别和评估以及财务安全)。鉴于护理人员对保健和社会护理作出的巨大贡献,他们应该得到这样的投资,以支持他们的工作。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究项目资助的独立研究,奖励号为18/01/01。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信