Correlation Between Blood Coagulation Profile and Viscosity: Clinical Laboratory Observational Study.

Q1 Medicine
Ezekiel U Nwose, Phillip T Bwititi
{"title":"Correlation Between Blood Coagulation Profile and Viscosity: Clinical Laboratory Observational Study.","authors":"Ezekiel U Nwose, Phillip T Bwititi","doi":"10.3390/medsci13010020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whole blood viscosity is a test for blood stasis and is an ideal evidence-based pathology parameter that is largely undervalued and retrogressing in clinical utilization. Coagulation profiles as indices of haemostasis are available but limited to central or referral laboratories and often involve long turn-around time. It is therefore important to study the correlation between the index of stasis and indices of haemostasis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the correlation of index of stasis with indices of haemostasis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The clinical laboratory observational research method, using archived pathology data. Indices of haemostasis including activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT), the international normalization ratio (INR), and plasma D-dimer were evaluated. On the other hand, the index of blood stasis used was the estimated whole blood viscosity (eWBV) and derived haematocrit and serum protein levels. All (N = 193) tests were collected within a calendar year from the same pathology service, and further, for the correlation, each set of variables from the same blood sample collection was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The haemostasis data are skewed (skewness > 2.0), while eWBV and platelet count are normal (skewness < 2.0). Haemostasis indices have an inverse association with eWBV (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The concordance and correlation of eWBV with platelet count is positive, weak, and significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but negative and negligible with PT and APTT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are limitations to the possible correlation between eWBV and haemostasis indices. However, haemostasis indices have inverse associations with eWBV, and the latter can aid in the evaluation of haemostasis hence could be utilized as an alternative or complementary test to haemostasis tests. Research may normalize skewed data to obtain better correlation; therefore, further study is required to advance discourse, giving cognizance to clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13010020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whole blood viscosity is a test for blood stasis and is an ideal evidence-based pathology parameter that is largely undervalued and retrogressing in clinical utilization. Coagulation profiles as indices of haemostasis are available but limited to central or referral laboratories and often involve long turn-around time. It is therefore important to study the correlation between the index of stasis and indices of haemostasis.

Objective: To investigate the correlation of index of stasis with indices of haemostasis.

Method: The clinical laboratory observational research method, using archived pathology data. Indices of haemostasis including activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT), the international normalization ratio (INR), and plasma D-dimer were evaluated. On the other hand, the index of blood stasis used was the estimated whole blood viscosity (eWBV) and derived haematocrit and serum protein levels. All (N = 193) tests were collected within a calendar year from the same pathology service, and further, for the correlation, each set of variables from the same blood sample collection was used.

Results: The haemostasis data are skewed (skewness > 2.0), while eWBV and platelet count are normal (skewness < 2.0). Haemostasis indices have an inverse association with eWBV (p < 0.001). The concordance and correlation of eWBV with platelet count is positive, weak, and significant (p < 0.001), but negative and negligible with PT and APTT.

Conclusion: There are limitations to the possible correlation between eWBV and haemostasis indices. However, haemostasis indices have inverse associations with eWBV, and the latter can aid in the evaluation of haemostasis hence could be utilized as an alternative or complementary test to haemostasis tests. Research may normalize skewed data to obtain better correlation; therefore, further study is required to advance discourse, giving cognizance to clinical practice.

凝血特征与黏度的相关性:临床实验室观察研究。
全血黏度是一种检测血瘀的方法,是一种理想的循证病理参数,但在临床应用中被严重低估和倒退。凝血谱作为止血指标是可用的,但仅限于中心或转诊实验室,而且往往需要很长的周转时间。因此,研究瘀血指数与止血指数的相关性具有重要意义。目的:探讨瘀血指标与止血指标的相关性。方法:采用临床实验室观察研究方法,利用存档的病理资料。止血指标包括活化部分凝血活素时间(APTT)和凝血酶原时间(PT)、国际正常化比(INR)、血浆d -二聚体。另一方面,使用的血瘀指数是估计的全血粘度(eWBV)和衍生红细胞压积和血清蛋白水平。所有(N = 193)项检测都是在同一病理服务机构的一个日历年内收集的,此外,为了确定相关性,使用了来自同一血样收集的每组变量。结果:止血数据偏斜(偏度bbb2.0),而eWBV和血小板计数正常(偏度< 2.0)。血流止血指数与eWBV呈负相关(p < 0.001)。eWBV与血小板计数呈弱正相关(p < 0.001),与PT、APTT呈负相关,可忽略不计。结论:eWBV与止血指标的相关性存在一定的局限性。然而,止血指标与eWBV呈负相关,后者可以帮助评估止血效果,因此可以作为止血试验的替代或补充试验。研究可以对偏斜数据进行归一化,以获得更好的相关性;因此,需要进一步的研究来推进论述,给予临床实践认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信