Checklist Approach to Developing and Implementing AI in Clinical Settings: Instrument Development Study.

JMIRx med Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.2196/65565
Ayomide Owoyemi, Joanne Osuchukwu, Megan E Salwei, Andrew Boyd
{"title":"Checklist Approach to Developing and Implementing AI in Clinical Settings: Instrument Development Study.","authors":"Ayomide Owoyemi, Joanne Osuchukwu, Megan E Salwei, Andrew Boyd","doi":"10.2196/65565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care settings demands a nuanced approach that considers both technical performance and sociotechnical factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a checklist that addresses the sociotechnical aspects of AI deployment in health care and provides a structured, holistic guide for teams involved in the life cycle of AI systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature synthesis identified 20 relevant studies, forming the foundation for the Clinical AI Sociotechnical Framework checklist. A modified Delphi study was then conducted with 35 global health care professionals. Participants assessed the checklist's relevance across 4 stages: \"Planning,\" \"Design,\" \"Development,\" and \"Proposed Implementation.\" A consensus threshold of 80% was established for each item. IQRs and Cronbach α were calculated to assess agreement and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial checklist had 45 questions. Following participant feedback, the checklist was refined to 34 items, and a final round saw 100% consensus on all items (mean score >0.8, IQR 0). Based on the outcome of the Delphi study, a final checklist was outlined, with 1 more question added to make 35 questions in total.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Clinical AI Sociotechnical Framework checklist provides a comprehensive, structured approach to developing and implementing AI in clinical settings, addressing technical and social factors critical for adoption and success. This checklist is a practical tool that aligns AI development with real-world clinical needs, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and integrate smoothly into health care workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":73558,"journal":{"name":"JMIRx med","volume":"6 ","pages":"e65565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIRx med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care settings demands a nuanced approach that considers both technical performance and sociotechnical factors.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a checklist that addresses the sociotechnical aspects of AI deployment in health care and provides a structured, holistic guide for teams involved in the life cycle of AI systems.

Methods: A literature synthesis identified 20 relevant studies, forming the foundation for the Clinical AI Sociotechnical Framework checklist. A modified Delphi study was then conducted with 35 global health care professionals. Participants assessed the checklist's relevance across 4 stages: "Planning," "Design," "Development," and "Proposed Implementation." A consensus threshold of 80% was established for each item. IQRs and Cronbach α were calculated to assess agreement and reliability.

Results: The initial checklist had 45 questions. Following participant feedback, the checklist was refined to 34 items, and a final round saw 100% consensus on all items (mean score >0.8, IQR 0). Based on the outcome of the Delphi study, a final checklist was outlined, with 1 more question added to make 35 questions in total.

Conclusions: The Clinical AI Sociotechnical Framework checklist provides a comprehensive, structured approach to developing and implementing AI in clinical settings, addressing technical and social factors critical for adoption and success. This checklist is a practical tool that aligns AI development with real-world clinical needs, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and integrate smoothly into health care workflows.

在临床环境中开发和实施人工智能的清单方法:仪器开发研究。
背景:人工智能(AI)在医疗保健环境中的整合需要一种细致入微的方法,同时考虑技术性能和社会技术因素。目的:本研究旨在制定一份清单,解决人工智能在医疗保健中部署的社会技术方面的问题,并为参与人工智能系统生命周期的团队提供结构化的整体指南。方法:文献综合确定了20项相关研究,形成了临床人工智能社会技术框架检查表的基础。然后对35名全球卫生保健专业人员进行了修改的德尔菲研究。参与者在4个阶段评估清单的相关性:“计划”、“设计”、“开发”和“建议实施”。每个项目的共识阈值为80%。计算IQRs和Cronbach α来评估一致性和可靠性。结果:最初的检查表有45个问题。根据参与者的反馈,清单被细化到34个项目,最后一轮对所有项目达成100%的共识(平均得分>.8,IQR 0)。根据德尔菲研究的结果,列出了最终的清单,并增加了1个问题,使总数达到35个问题。结论:临床人工智能社会技术框架清单为在临床环境中开发和实施人工智能提供了一个全面的、结构化的方法,解决了对采用和成功至关重要的技术和社会因素。这个清单是一个实用的工具,它使人工智能开发与现实世界的临床需求保持一致,旨在提高患者的治疗效果,并顺利融入医疗保健工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信