Medical policy determinations for pharmacogenetic tests among US health plans.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jai N Patel, Lena Chaihorsky, Olivia M Dong, Christine Y Lu, Chad Moretz, Emily Reese, Wrenda Teeple, Benjamin Brown, Sara Rogers
{"title":"Medical policy determinations for pharmacogenetic tests among US health plans.","authors":"Jai N Patel, Lena Chaihorsky, Olivia M Dong, Christine Y Lu, Chad Moretz, Emily Reese, Wrenda Teeple, Benjamin Brown, Sara Rogers","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate medical policy determinations for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for 65 clinically relevant drug-gene pairs and evidence cited to support determinations across major US health plans and laboratory benefit managers (LBMs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Landscape analysis of available PGx medical policies to determine coverage status of certain drug-gene pairs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PGx medical policies as of February 1, 2024, were ascertained through Policy Reporter for top national insurers, LBMs, and the Palmetto GBA Molecular Diagnostic Services (MolDX) Program, which determines whether a molecular diagnostic test is covered by Medicare. Data elements included date of last policy update, coverage status for each drug-gene pair, and evidence cited for or against coverage. A drug-gene pair was considered covered if the policy indicated that a PGx test was deemed medically necessary and/or meets coverage criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Policies from 8 insurers, 3 LBMs, and MolDX were available and reviewed. MolDX covered all 65 individual drug-gene pairs, followed by Avalon Healthcare Solutions (n = 50) and UnitedHealthcare (n = 45); these 3 also covered multigene panels. Eight policies covered 10 or fewer drug-gene pairs. HLA-B*57:01 testing prior to abacavir initiation and HLA-B*15:02 testing prior to carbamazepine initiation were covered across all policies. Drug-gene pairs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines and/or included in the FDA's Table of Pharmacogenetic Associations Section 1 were more commonly covered. Society guidelines were the most frequently cited evidence (413 times), and cost-effectiveness studies were infrequently cited (43 times).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found significant variability in medical policy determinations and evidence cited for clinically relevant PGx tests among major US health insurers and LBMs. A collaborative effort between payers and the PGx community to standardize evidence evaluation may lead to more consistent coverage and improve patient access to PGx tests meeting evidence requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 2","pages":"e47-e55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate medical policy determinations for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for 65 clinically relevant drug-gene pairs and evidence cited to support determinations across major US health plans and laboratory benefit managers (LBMs).

Study design: Landscape analysis of available PGx medical policies to determine coverage status of certain drug-gene pairs.

Methods: PGx medical policies as of February 1, 2024, were ascertained through Policy Reporter for top national insurers, LBMs, and the Palmetto GBA Molecular Diagnostic Services (MolDX) Program, which determines whether a molecular diagnostic test is covered by Medicare. Data elements included date of last policy update, coverage status for each drug-gene pair, and evidence cited for or against coverage. A drug-gene pair was considered covered if the policy indicated that a PGx test was deemed medically necessary and/or meets coverage criteria.

Results: Policies from 8 insurers, 3 LBMs, and MolDX were available and reviewed. MolDX covered all 65 individual drug-gene pairs, followed by Avalon Healthcare Solutions (n = 50) and UnitedHealthcare (n = 45); these 3 also covered multigene panels. Eight policies covered 10 or fewer drug-gene pairs. HLA-B*57:01 testing prior to abacavir initiation and HLA-B*15:02 testing prior to carbamazepine initiation were covered across all policies. Drug-gene pairs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines and/or included in the FDA's Table of Pharmacogenetic Associations Section 1 were more commonly covered. Society guidelines were the most frequently cited evidence (413 times), and cost-effectiveness studies were infrequently cited (43 times).

Conclusions: We found significant variability in medical policy determinations and evidence cited for clinically relevant PGx tests among major US health insurers and LBMs. A collaborative effort between payers and the PGx community to standardize evidence evaluation may lead to more consistent coverage and improve patient access to PGx tests meeting evidence requirements.

美国医疗保险计划对药物基因检测的医疗政策决定。
目的:评估65对临床相关药物基因对的药物遗传学(PGx)检测的医疗政策决定,并引用证据支持美国主要健康计划和实验室福利管理(lbm)的决定。研究设计:对现有的PGx医疗政策进行景观分析,以确定某些药物基因对的覆盖状况。方法:截至2024年2月1日,PGx医疗政策通过政策报告确定了顶级国家保险公司,lbm和Palmetto GBA分子诊断服务(MolDX)计划,该计划确定了分子诊断测试是否被医疗保险覆盖。数据元素包括上次政策更新的日期、每个药物基因对的覆盖状态以及支持或反对覆盖的证据。如果政策表明PGx测试被认为是医学上必要的和/或符合覆盖标准,则认为药物基因对被覆盖。结果:来自8家保险公司、3家lbm和MolDX的保单可供查阅。MolDX涵盖了所有65对药物基因对,其次是Avalon Healthcare Solutions (n = 50)和UnitedHealthcare (n = 45);这3个也涵盖了多基因组。8项政策涵盖了10对或更少的药物基因对。所有政策都涵盖了阿巴卡韦起始前的HLA-B*57:01检测和卡马西平起始前的HLA-B*15:02检测。与临床药理学实施联盟指南和/或列入FDA药理学关联表第1节的药物基因对更常被涵盖。社会指南是最常被引用的证据(413次),而成本效益研究很少被引用(43次)。结论:我们发现美国主要健康保险公司和lbm在医疗政策决定和临床相关PGx测试中引用的证据方面存在显著差异。支付方和PGx社区之间的协作努力将证据评估标准化,可能会导致更一致的覆盖范围,并改善患者获得符合证据要求的PGx检测的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信