Minimally invasive resection is associated with decreased occurrence of early delayed gastric conduit emptying after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Ingmar F Rompen, Batuhan Yilmazcelik, Nerma Crnovrsanin, Sabine Schiefer, Nicolas Jorek, Marcus Kantowski, Mohammed Al-Saeedi, Christoph W Michalski, Leila Sisic, Thomas Schmidt, Beat P Müller-Stich, Henrik Nienhüser
{"title":"Minimally invasive resection is associated with decreased occurrence of early delayed gastric conduit emptying after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.","authors":"Ingmar F Rompen, Batuhan Yilmazcelik, Nerma Crnovrsanin, Sabine Schiefer, Nicolas Jorek, Marcus Kantowski, Mohammed Al-Saeedi, Christoph W Michalski, Leila Sisic, Thomas Schmidt, Beat P Müller-Stich, Henrik Nienhüser","doi":"10.1093/dote/doaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) is a frequent complication after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (ILE). Despite its relevance, few studies are published using the international consensus criteria. Therefore, we aimed to assess predictors and clinical consequences of DGCE in patients after ILE. This analysis represents a retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients who underwent ILE (2016-2021). DGCE was assessed by the international consensus criteria. Univariable and a multivariable penalized LASSO logistic regression model was applied to identify predictors of DGCE, whereas postoperative outcomes were assessed by group comparisons. The incidence of early DGCE was 15.6% (46/294 included patients). Of all tested preoperatively known and treatment related factors, only minimally invasive surgery was associated with lower odds for the occurrence of DGCE (OR 0.33, 95%CI:0.12-0.77, P = 0.017) when compared to open surgery. When DGCE occurred, the impact on major postoperative morbidity was limited (DGCE 39.1% vs. non-DGCE 33.1%, P = 0.425), especially there were no differences in starting adjuvant treatment (DGCE 50% vs. non-DGCE 46%; P = 0.615) or overall survival (Log-Rank P = 0.995). The results of this study suggest that the impact of DGCE might have been overestimated in the past. The only factor found to be significantly associated with decreased DGCE was minimally invasive surgery. Therefore, individual patient selection for preventive interventions is difficult and routine preventive interventions only seem justified when they can be performed with low adverse outcomes and at low cost. Higher evidence from randomized controlled trials is needed to assess the optimal strategy to prevent and treat DGCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) is a frequent complication after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (ILE). Despite its relevance, few studies are published using the international consensus criteria. Therefore, we aimed to assess predictors and clinical consequences of DGCE in patients after ILE. This analysis represents a retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients who underwent ILE (2016-2021). DGCE was assessed by the international consensus criteria. Univariable and a multivariable penalized LASSO logistic regression model was applied to identify predictors of DGCE, whereas postoperative outcomes were assessed by group comparisons. The incidence of early DGCE was 15.6% (46/294 included patients). Of all tested preoperatively known and treatment related factors, only minimally invasive surgery was associated with lower odds for the occurrence of DGCE (OR 0.33, 95%CI:0.12-0.77, P = 0.017) when compared to open surgery. When DGCE occurred, the impact on major postoperative morbidity was limited (DGCE 39.1% vs. non-DGCE 33.1%, P = 0.425), especially there were no differences in starting adjuvant treatment (DGCE 50% vs. non-DGCE 46%; P = 0.615) or overall survival (Log-Rank P = 0.995). The results of this study suggest that the impact of DGCE might have been overestimated in the past. The only factor found to be significantly associated with decreased DGCE was minimally invasive surgery. Therefore, individual patient selection for preventive interventions is difficult and routine preventive interventions only seem justified when they can be performed with low adverse outcomes and at low cost. Higher evidence from randomized controlled trials is needed to assess the optimal strategy to prevent and treat DGCE.

微创切除术与伊沃-刘易斯食管切除术后早期胃导管排空延迟发生率降低有关。
早期延迟胃导管排空(DGCE)是伊沃-刘易斯食管切除术(ILE)后经常出现的并发症。尽管与之相关,但采用国际共识标准发表的研究却很少。因此,我们旨在评估 ILE 术后患者 DGCE 的预测因素和临床后果。本分析是对接受 ILE 的患者(2016-2021 年)进行的一项回顾性单中心队列研究。DGCE 根据国际共识标准进行评估。应用单变量和多变量惩罚性LASSO逻辑回归模型确定DGCE的预测因素,并通过组间比较评估术后结果。早期 DGCE 的发生率为 15.6%(46/294 例患者)。在所有检测的术前已知因素和治疗相关因素中,与开放手术相比,只有微创手术发生 DGCE 的几率较低(OR 0.33,95%CI:0.12-0.77,P = 0.017)。发生 DGCE 时,对术后主要发病率的影响有限(DGCE 39.1% vs. 非 DGCE 33.1%,P = 0.425),尤其是在开始辅助治疗(DGCE 50% vs. 非 DGCE 46%;P = 0.615)或总生存率(Log-Rank P = 0.995)方面没有差异。本研究结果表明,DGCE的影响在过去可能被高估了。研究发现,唯一与DGCE下降有明显关系的因素是微创手术。因此,很难对个别患者进行预防性干预的选择,常规预防性干预似乎只有在不良后果低、成本低的情况下才有必要。要评估预防和治疗DGCE的最佳策略,还需要更多来自随机对照试验的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信