'Diagnose & Adios': Multi-Perspective Insights on Formal Service Use in Dementia Family Caregivers.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Francesca Falzarano, Annabelle Greenfield, Francesco Osso, Katerina Bumbalova, Rachel F Bloom
{"title":"'Diagnose & Adios': Multi-Perspective Insights on Formal Service Use in Dementia Family Caregivers.","authors":"Francesca Falzarano, Annabelle Greenfield, Francesco Osso, Katerina Bumbalova, Rachel F Bloom","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Dementia family caregiving is a complex role that becomes increasingly intense and demanding over time. The utilization of home and community-based services (HCBS) can provide knowledge and skills to foster preparedness, which may protect against adverse caregiving outcomes; yet actual uptake of services remains low. The current study aims to gather multi-perspective insights underlying the disconnect between caregivers' need for - versus utilization of - HCBS using Pearlin et al.'s (1990) stress process model as a guiding theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Five focus groups of 4-8 participants each were conducted with dementia family caregivers (n=13) and Subject Matter Experts (n=17). A deductive-inductive thematic approach was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching concepts were identified: \"Pathways to Preparedness'', \"Multi-Level Barriers\", and \"Bridging the Gap.\" Findings reflected caregivers' need for support in four core areas: 1) Dementia-specific education/training; 2) Competent mental health support; 3) Financial/legal navigation, and 4) Emergency readiness. Results revealed cross-dimensional barriers across individual-, provider-, and systemic-contexts impeding HCBS access and utilization. Personalized caregiving navigation and technology were deemed potential solutions to facilitate clearer clinical pathways between unmet needs and relevant services.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Results underscore the complexity of the HCBS system in the United States and highlight the multidimensional barriers disrupting the pipeline connecting caregivers to HCBS. Findings can inform web-based behavioral interventions aiming to enhance family caregivers' knowledge of, access to, and utilization of formal services in community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Dementia family caregiving is a complex role that becomes increasingly intense and demanding over time. The utilization of home and community-based services (HCBS) can provide knowledge and skills to foster preparedness, which may protect against adverse caregiving outcomes; yet actual uptake of services remains low. The current study aims to gather multi-perspective insights underlying the disconnect between caregivers' need for - versus utilization of - HCBS using Pearlin et al.'s (1990) stress process model as a guiding theoretical framework.

Research design and methods: Five focus groups of 4-8 participants each were conducted with dementia family caregivers (n=13) and Subject Matter Experts (n=17). A deductive-inductive thematic approach was used for data analysis.

Results: Three overarching concepts were identified: "Pathways to Preparedness'', "Multi-Level Barriers", and "Bridging the Gap." Findings reflected caregivers' need for support in four core areas: 1) Dementia-specific education/training; 2) Competent mental health support; 3) Financial/legal navigation, and 4) Emergency readiness. Results revealed cross-dimensional barriers across individual-, provider-, and systemic-contexts impeding HCBS access and utilization. Personalized caregiving navigation and technology were deemed potential solutions to facilitate clearer clinical pathways between unmet needs and relevant services.

Discussion and implications: Results underscore the complexity of the HCBS system in the United States and highlight the multidimensional barriers disrupting the pipeline connecting caregivers to HCBS. Findings can inform web-based behavioral interventions aiming to enhance family caregivers' knowledge of, access to, and utilization of formal services in community settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信