Unravelling the coagulation paradox in liver cirrhosis: challenges and insights.

Abstract

Patients with liver disease experience complex haemostatic changes leading to a state of 'rebalanced haemostasis' that may shift towards bleeding or thrombosis due to complications like kidney dysfunction, bacterial infection, or acute-on-chronic liver failure. Traditional coagulation tests inadequately capture haemostasis in cirrhosis, whereas advanced assays like thrombin generation assay and viscoelastic testing offer better insights but remain limited in clinical outcome prediction or guiding pre-procedural prophylaxis.Contrary to the traditional view of cirrhosis as a bleeding disorder, recent evidence highlights a paradox of higher venous thromboembolism incidence in hospitalised cirrhotic patients. Misconceptions about 'auto-anticoagulation' and concerns about anticoagulation safety hinder consistent thromboprophylaxis. Emerging data suggest that low molecular weight heparin is safe and effective in cirrhotic patients, supporting more evidence-based thromboprophylaxis. For thrombotic events or conditions like atrial fibrillation, therapeutic anticoagulation is recommended, and may offer additional benefits, such as attenuating liver fibrosis and portal hypertension. However, anticoagulation is not established as a core therapy in cirrhosis, given safety concerns in advanced disease.Bleeding remains a significant challenge in cirrhosis, with management focusing on specific aetiologies, including portal hypertension or procedural injuries. In pre-procedural planning, there is a trend of unnecessary blood product use, often based on an assumed bleeding risk. Rational pre-procedural planning should minimize unnecessary transfusions, optimise modifiable risks, and include a plan for managing potential bleeding.This review aims to clarify the 'coagulation paradox' in cirrhosis, promoting a nuanced, individualized approach to managing bleeding and thrombosis in chronic liver disease.