Jessica L Sosso, Karen M Fischer, Michelle A Lampman, Gregory M Garrison, Stephen K Stacey, Matthew E Bernard, Randy M Foss, Dominika A Jegen, Summer V Allen, Tom D Thacher
{"title":"Relationship Between Social Risks and Diabetes Metrics in a US Health System.","authors":"Jessica L Sosso, Karen M Fischer, Michelle A Lampman, Gregory M Garrison, Stephen K Stacey, Matthew E Bernard, Randy M Foss, Dominika A Jegen, Summer V Allen, Tom D Thacher","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230498R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this cross-sectional analysis was to evaluate the association of multiple social risk domains on the attainment of a composite quality metric in patients with diabetes in a large US regional practice.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study population included adult patients with type 2 diabetes empaneled to a family medicine clinician in Mayo Clinic Rochester or Mayo Clinic Health System. Patients met the diabetes metric (D5) if: HgbA1c < 8, Blood pressure < 140/90, statin use unless contraindicated, avoidance of tobacco use, and aspirin use if coexisting vascular disease. The D5 metric, demographic, and social risks year end 2022 data were collected from the electronic health record (EHR). A multiple logistic regression model was calculated for each social risk domain, controlling for demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 44,010 patients with type 2 diabetes, the D5 metric was less likely to be met in those who were younger, nonwhite, rural, lower visit utilizers, or who had commercial or unknown insurance. Patients who gave high-risk answers to social risk domains of housing risk, financial risk, food insecurity, and transportation needs were significantly less likely to meet the D5 metric.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This data reinforces the important clinical impact social risk factors have for primary care patients and highlights the need for more interventional studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 5","pages":"939-947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230498R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The primary aim of this cross-sectional analysis was to evaluate the association of multiple social risk domains on the attainment of a composite quality metric in patients with diabetes in a large US regional practice.
Research design and methods: The study population included adult patients with type 2 diabetes empaneled to a family medicine clinician in Mayo Clinic Rochester or Mayo Clinic Health System. Patients met the diabetes metric (D5) if: HgbA1c < 8, Blood pressure < 140/90, statin use unless contraindicated, avoidance of tobacco use, and aspirin use if coexisting vascular disease. The D5 metric, demographic, and social risks year end 2022 data were collected from the electronic health record (EHR). A multiple logistic regression model was calculated for each social risk domain, controlling for demographic factors.
Results: Among 44,010 patients with type 2 diabetes, the D5 metric was less likely to be met in those who were younger, nonwhite, rural, lower visit utilizers, or who had commercial or unknown insurance. Patients who gave high-risk answers to social risk domains of housing risk, financial risk, food insecurity, and transportation needs were significantly less likely to meet the D5 metric.
Conclusions: This data reinforces the important clinical impact social risk factors have for primary care patients and highlights the need for more interventional studies.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.