Jianyi Liu, Mara Tynan, Alexandra Mouangue, Caroline Martin, Stephanie Manasse, Kathryn Godfrey
{"title":"Mindfulness-based interventions for binge eating: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jianyi Liu, Mara Tynan, Alexandra Mouangue, Caroline Martin, Stephanie Manasse, Kathryn Godfrey","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00550-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have gained popularity in recent years in treating binge eating. Previous reviews and meta-analyses have found that MBIs demonstrated medium-large to large effects in reducing binge eating. However, as the literature on this topic has been growing rapidly, an updated review on MBIs' effectiveness is much needed. This study is a 10-year update of the Godfrey, Gallo, & Afari (2015) systematic review and meta-analysis of MBIs for binge eating. PubMED, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched using keywords including binge eating, overeating, objective bulimic episodes, acceptance and commitment therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, mindfulness, meditation, and mindful eating. Results indicate there has been a large increase in the number of studies testing MBIs for binge eating in the past 10 years with 54 studies meeting inclusion criteria, compared to 19 ten years ago. The majority of the studies yielded large and medium effect sizes. The random effects meta-analysis of between-group effect sizes yielded medium-large effects for MBIs versus non-psychological intervention controls at post-treatment (mean Hedge's g = - 0.65) and follow-up (mean Hedge's g = - 0.71), and negligible effects for MBIs versus active psychological controls at post-treatment (mean Hedge's g = - 0.05) and follow-up (mean Hedge's g = 0.13). Of all MBIs, DBT had the most studies with large effects. More studies examined MBIs that directly targeted binge eating had larger effects than studies with MBIs targeting other health outcomes (with binge eating as a secondary outcome). New studies included in the current review were internationally-conducted, focused more on participants with overweight or obesity, involved more self-help and technology-based components, and had more novel and innovative interventions components. Future MBIs research should conduct more RCTs comparing MBIs with other psychological interventions, conduct meta-analyses to examine the effectiveness of different types of MBIs and intervention targets, and extend follow-up periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"57-89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00550-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have gained popularity in recent years in treating binge eating. Previous reviews and meta-analyses have found that MBIs demonstrated medium-large to large effects in reducing binge eating. However, as the literature on this topic has been growing rapidly, an updated review on MBIs' effectiveness is much needed. This study is a 10-year update of the Godfrey, Gallo, & Afari (2015) systematic review and meta-analysis of MBIs for binge eating. PubMED, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched using keywords including binge eating, overeating, objective bulimic episodes, acceptance and commitment therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, mindfulness, meditation, and mindful eating. Results indicate there has been a large increase in the number of studies testing MBIs for binge eating in the past 10 years with 54 studies meeting inclusion criteria, compared to 19 ten years ago. The majority of the studies yielded large and medium effect sizes. The random effects meta-analysis of between-group effect sizes yielded medium-large effects for MBIs versus non-psychological intervention controls at post-treatment (mean Hedge's g = - 0.65) and follow-up (mean Hedge's g = - 0.71), and negligible effects for MBIs versus active psychological controls at post-treatment (mean Hedge's g = - 0.05) and follow-up (mean Hedge's g = 0.13). Of all MBIs, DBT had the most studies with large effects. More studies examined MBIs that directly targeted binge eating had larger effects than studies with MBIs targeting other health outcomes (with binge eating as a secondary outcome). New studies included in the current review were internationally-conducted, focused more on participants with overweight or obesity, involved more self-help and technology-based components, and had more novel and innovative interventions components. Future MBIs research should conduct more RCTs comparing MBIs with other psychological interventions, conduct meta-analyses to examine the effectiveness of different types of MBIs and intervention targets, and extend follow-up periods.
近年来,正念干预(MBIs)在治疗暴饮暴食方面越来越受欢迎。先前的评论和荟萃分析发现,mbi在减少暴饮暴食方面表现出中大型到大型的效果。然而,随着关于这一主题的文献迅速增长,对mbi有效性的最新综述是非常必要的。这项研究是Godfrey, Gallo, & Afari(2015)对暴饮暴食的mbi进行的系统回顾和荟萃分析的10年更新。使用关键词包括暴食、暴饮暴食、客观暴食症发作、接受与承诺疗法、辩证行为疗法、正念、冥想和正念饮食,对PubMED、PsycINFO和Web of Science进行了搜索。结果表明,在过去10年里,测试mbi与暴食相关的研究数量大幅增加,符合纳入标准的研究有54项,而10年前只有19项。大多数研究产生了大中型效应。组间效应大小的随机效应荟萃分析显示,在治疗后(平均Hedge’s g = - 0.65)和随访(平均Hedge’s g = - 0.71), MBIs与非心理干预对照组的效应为中大型,而在治疗后(平均Hedge’s g = - 0.05)和随访(平均Hedge’s g = 0.13), MBIs与积极心理对照组的效应可以忽略不计。在所有mbbi中,DBT的研究最多,影响很大。更多的研究表明,直接针对暴饮暴食的mbi比针对其他健康结果(暴饮暴食作为次要结果)的mbi效果更大。当前综述中包括的新研究是在国际上进行的,更多地关注超重或肥胖的参与者,更多地涉及自助和基于技术的成分,并有更多新颖和创新的干预成分。未来的mbi研究应开展更多的随机对照试验,将mbi与其他心理干预措施进行比较,进行荟萃分析,检验不同类型的mbi和干预目标的有效性,延长随访期。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders. Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.