Ketamine Versus Haloperidol/Lorazepam/Diphenhydramine Combination Treatment for Management of Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department.

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S486208
Nicole Sunshine, Jenny Martinez, Alexandra Bazan, William R Wolowich, Tony Zitek
{"title":"Ketamine Versus Haloperidol/Lorazepam/Diphenhydramine Combination Treatment for Management of Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Nicole Sunshine, Jenny Martinez, Alexandra Bazan, William R Wolowich, Tony Zitek","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S486208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Appropriate use and timing of agents for chemical management of patient agitation is critical for the safety of patients and providers. Ketamine may have a preferable safety profile in acutely agitated patients, especially those with an unknown medication history given that it does not carry the same cardiovascular and respiratory risks as other sedative agents currently used in practice. This study aimed to evaluate subsequent chemical sedation requirements and the incidence of adverse events following the use of ketamine for agitation as compared to combination antipsychotic/sedative use in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study of 102 adult patients who received chemical sedation for agitation/aggression/combative behavior from January 2018 to December 2023 at the Mount Sinai Medical Center Emergency Department. Patients who received at least one dose of ketamine (n = 51) were compared to patients who received at least one dose of the B52 combination (diphenhydramine (Benadryl) 25 mg, haloperidol (Haldol) 5 mg, and lorazepam (Ativan) 2 mg) (n = 51) for management of aggression. The primary endpoint was restricted mean survival time (RMST) to next sedative given. Secondary endpoints included the number of additional sedatives needed, adverse events, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of ketamine was associated with patients requiring additional sedation both more often and sooner than patients who received the B52 combination (RMST to next sedative: 2.1 hours ketamine vs 4 hours B52; <i>p</i> = 0.032, median additional doses: 3 doses ketamine group vs 0 doses B52 group; <i>p</i> < 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In agitated patients within the ED, the administration of ketamine demonstrated inadequate duration of sedation and increased need for supplemental sedative use compared to B52.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"113-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S486208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Appropriate use and timing of agents for chemical management of patient agitation is critical for the safety of patients and providers. Ketamine may have a preferable safety profile in acutely agitated patients, especially those with an unknown medication history given that it does not carry the same cardiovascular and respiratory risks as other sedative agents currently used in practice. This study aimed to evaluate subsequent chemical sedation requirements and the incidence of adverse events following the use of ketamine for agitation as compared to combination antipsychotic/sedative use in the ED.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study of 102 adult patients who received chemical sedation for agitation/aggression/combative behavior from January 2018 to December 2023 at the Mount Sinai Medical Center Emergency Department. Patients who received at least one dose of ketamine (n = 51) were compared to patients who received at least one dose of the B52 combination (diphenhydramine (Benadryl) 25 mg, haloperidol (Haldol) 5 mg, and lorazepam (Ativan) 2 mg) (n = 51) for management of aggression. The primary endpoint was restricted mean survival time (RMST) to next sedative given. Secondary endpoints included the number of additional sedatives needed, adverse events, and length of stay.

Results: The use of ketamine was associated with patients requiring additional sedation both more often and sooner than patients who received the B52 combination (RMST to next sedative: 2.1 hours ketamine vs 4 hours B52; p = 0.032, median additional doses: 3 doses ketamine group vs 0 doses B52 group; p < 0.00).

Conclusion: In agitated patients within the ED, the administration of ketamine demonstrated inadequate duration of sedation and increased need for supplemental sedative use compared to B52.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信