Resident and nurse attitudes toward a rapid response team in a tertiary hospital in South Korea.

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Acute and Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.4266/acc.004272
Sung Yoon Lim, Ho Geol Woo, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Jae Ho Lee, Yeon Joo Lee
{"title":"Resident and nurse attitudes toward a rapid response team in a tertiary hospital in South Korea.","authors":"Sung Yoon Lim, Ho Geol Woo, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Jae Ho Lee, Yeon Joo Lee","doi":"10.4266/acc.004272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residents and nurses who activate rapid response teams (RRTs) are well positioned to offer insights on its effectiveness. Here, we assess such evaluation of RRTs and identify barriers to activation in a 1,400-bed teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 24-item Likert-scale survey from January to May 2017 among residents and ward nurses with RRT experience. Factor analysis was used to identify the barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study comprised 305 nurses and 53 residents, most of whom were satisfied with their RRT experiences. Factor analysis showed that lack of awareness of activation criteria was a major barrier, with only 21.4% and 22.2% participants, respectively, confident about their knowledge of activation protocols. Of the survey respondents, 85.7% reported first contacting the doctor before activating the RRT. Despite the protocol, 66.7% first discussed the decision with other staff, and 71.5% called the RRT when the patient's condition worsened despite management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses and residents value RRTs but face barriers in initiation, primarily due to a lack of confidence in applying the activation criteria. Many prefer to consult a doctor or manage the patient before calling the RRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":44118,"journal":{"name":"Acute and Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.004272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Residents and nurses who activate rapid response teams (RRTs) are well positioned to offer insights on its effectiveness. Here, we assess such evaluation of RRTs and identify barriers to activation in a 1,400-bed teaching hospital.

Methods: We conducted a 24-item Likert-scale survey from January to May 2017 among residents and ward nurses with RRT experience. Factor analysis was used to identify the barriers.

Results: This study comprised 305 nurses and 53 residents, most of whom were satisfied with their RRT experiences. Factor analysis showed that lack of awareness of activation criteria was a major barrier, with only 21.4% and 22.2% participants, respectively, confident about their knowledge of activation protocols. Of the survey respondents, 85.7% reported first contacting the doctor before activating the RRT. Despite the protocol, 66.7% first discussed the decision with other staff, and 71.5% called the RRT when the patient's condition worsened despite management.

Conclusions: Nurses and residents value RRTs but face barriers in initiation, primarily due to a lack of confidence in applying the activation criteria. Many prefer to consult a doctor or manage the patient before calling the RRT.

韩国一家三级医院的住院医生和护士对快速反应小组的态度。
背景:激活快速反应小组(RRTs)的住院医师和护士能够很好地为其有效性提供见解。在这里,我们评估了RRTs的评估,并确定了在一家拥有1400个床位的教学医院中激活RRTs的障碍。方法:于2017年1 - 5月对具有RRT经验的住院医师和病房护士进行24项李克特量表调查。采用因子分析法确定障碍。结果:本研究共纳入305名护士和53名住院医师,其中大部分对RRT体验感到满意。因子分析显示,缺乏对激活标准的认识是主要障碍,分别只有21.4%和22.2%的参与者对自己的激活协议知识有信心。在调查对象中,85.7%的人在激活RRT之前先联系了医生。尽管有协议,66.7%的人首先与其他工作人员讨论了决定,71.5%的人在患者病情恶化时打电话给RRT,尽管有管理。结论:护士和住院医师重视RRTs,但在启动时面临障碍,主要是由于对应用激活标准缺乏信心。许多人更愿意在打电话给RRT之前咨询医生或管理病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute and Critical Care
Acute and Critical Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信