Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234
Jonas Korsholm Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Jesper Lykkegaard
{"title":"Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice.","authors":"Jonas Korsholm Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Jesper Lykkegaard","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There may be distinctly different ways for general practices to serve the growing population of older patients, providing them different combinations of face-to-face-, telephone-, and e-mail consultations, home visits, and chronic care reviews.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify latent general practice profiles of frequency and combination of consultation types for older patients and relate them to practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Register-based cohort study of all Danish citizens aged≥75 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For each of the years 2017-2021, a latent profile analysis was conducted on the practices' frequencies of consultation types adjusting for patient population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a \"Majority\" and three temporary latent profiles of provision of consultation services to older patients: The \"Phone heavy\" profile (8-10% of practices, 2017-2019) providing nearly double the telephone consultations as the \"Majority\" profile and was associated with the general practitioners being older and working singlehanded, the \"High frequency\" profile (12-14% of practices, 2017-2018) providing higher levels of face-to-face, telephone, and e-mail consultations than the \"Majority\" profile, and the \"Phone and e-mail heavy\" profile (7% of practices, 2020) providing more e-mail than face-to-face consultations, and more of each consultation than the \"Majority\" profile. The number of profiles decreased from 3 in 2017 to only the \"Majority\" profile 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a trend towards a more uniform pattern of consultations for older patients in general practice. It is unknown whether high provision of certain types of consultations in general practice has downstream effects, such as decreased need for hospital- and out-of-hours services.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There may be distinctly different ways for general practices to serve the growing population of older patients, providing them different combinations of face-to-face-, telephone-, and e-mail consultations, home visits, and chronic care reviews.

Aim: To identify latent general practice profiles of frequency and combination of consultation types for older patients and relate them to practice characteristics.

Design & setting: Register-based cohort study of all Danish citizens aged≥75 years.

Method: For each of the years 2017-2021, a latent profile analysis was conducted on the practices' frequencies of consultation types adjusting for patient population characteristics.

Results: We identified a "Majority" and three temporary latent profiles of provision of consultation services to older patients: The "Phone heavy" profile (8-10% of practices, 2017-2019) providing nearly double the telephone consultations as the "Majority" profile and was associated with the general practitioners being older and working singlehanded, the "High frequency" profile (12-14% of practices, 2017-2018) providing higher levels of face-to-face, telephone, and e-mail consultations than the "Majority" profile, and the "Phone and e-mail heavy" profile (7% of practices, 2020) providing more e-mail than face-to-face consultations, and more of each consultation than the "Majority" profile. The number of profiles decreased from 3 in 2017 to only the "Majority" profile 2021.

Conclusion: There is a trend towards a more uniform pattern of consultations for older patients in general practice. It is unknown whether high provision of certain types of consultations in general practice has downstream effects, such as decreased need for hospital- and out-of-hours services.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信