A T2 Translational Science Modified Delphi Study: The Ethical Triage and Treatment of Entrapped and Mangled Extremities in Resource-Scarce Environments.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Eric S Weinstein, Zachary Gilbert, James Gosney, Brielle Weinstein, Hannah B Wild, Joseph Cuthbertson, Melissa Leming, Rachel Semmons, Dónal O'Mathúna, Carl Montan, Richard Gosselin, Frederick Skip Burkle
{"title":"A T2 Translational Science Modified Delphi Study: The Ethical Triage and Treatment of Entrapped and Mangled Extremities in Resource-Scarce Environments.","authors":"Eric S Weinstein, Zachary Gilbert, James Gosney, Brielle Weinstein, Hannah B Wild, Joseph Cuthbertson, Melissa Leming, Rachel Semmons, Dónal O'Mathúna, Carl Montan, Richard Gosselin, Frederick Skip Burkle","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of ethical triage and treatment guidelines for the entrapped and mangled extremity (E&ME) in resource-scarce environments (RSE): mass casualty incidents, low- to middle-income countries, complex humanitarian emergencies including conflict, and prolonged transport times (RSE). The aim of this study is to use a modified Delphi (mD) approach to produce statements to develop treatment guidelines of the E&ME in RSE.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Experts rated their agreement with each statement on a 7-point linear numeric scale. Consensus amongst experts was defined as a standard deviation ≤ 1. Statements attaining consensus after the first round moved to the final report. Those not attaining consensus moved to the second round in which experts were shown the mean response of the expert panel and their own response for the opportunity to reconsider their rating for that round. Statements attaining consensus after the second round moved to the final report. This process was repeated in the third round. Statements attaining consensus were moved to the final report. The remaining statements did not attain consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven experts participated in the first, 75 in the second, and 74 in the third round. Twenty-three statements attained consensus. Twenty-one statements did not attain consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A modified Delphi technique was used to establish consensus regarding the numerous complex factors influencing treatment of the E&ME in RSEs. Twenty-three statements attained consensus and can be incorporated into guidelines to advance the ethical treatment of the E&ME in RSEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of ethical triage and treatment guidelines for the entrapped and mangled extremity (E&ME) in resource-scarce environments (RSE): mass casualty incidents, low- to middle-income countries, complex humanitarian emergencies including conflict, and prolonged transport times (RSE). The aim of this study is to use a modified Delphi (mD) approach to produce statements to develop treatment guidelines of the E&ME in RSE.

Method: Experts rated their agreement with each statement on a 7-point linear numeric scale. Consensus amongst experts was defined as a standard deviation ≤ 1. Statements attaining consensus after the first round moved to the final report. Those not attaining consensus moved to the second round in which experts were shown the mean response of the expert panel and their own response for the opportunity to reconsider their rating for that round. Statements attaining consensus after the second round moved to the final report. This process was repeated in the third round. Statements attaining consensus were moved to the final report. The remaining statements did not attain consensus.

Results: Seventy-seven experts participated in the first, 75 in the second, and 74 in the third round. Twenty-three statements attained consensus. Twenty-one statements did not attain consensus.

Conclusion: A modified Delphi technique was used to establish consensus regarding the numerous complex factors influencing treatment of the E&ME in RSEs. Twenty-three statements attained consensus and can be incorporated into guidelines to advance the ethical treatment of the E&ME in RSEs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信