Marieke Geerars, Natasja C Wouda, Richard A W Felius, Johanna M A Visser-Meily, Martijn F Pisters, Michiel Punt
{"title":"Postural Sway Measurement Using a Body-Worn Movement Sensor in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation: Exploring Sensitivity to Change and Responsiveness.","authors":"Marieke Geerars, Natasja C Wouda, Richard A W Felius, Johanna M A Visser-Meily, Martijn F Pisters, Michiel Punt","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>During rehabilitation, stroke survivor's balance is commonly monitored using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Mini-BESTest. These tests evaluate the ability to maintain balance in an upright position while performing tasks. Currently, clinical practice lacks an adequate assessment of balance impairments like the increased postural sway post-stroke. Integrating postural sway measurement with a body-worn Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) could offer clinicians an objective, and rapid measurement method.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of postural sway measurement during stroke rehabilitation were explored.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A longitudinal study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data were collected in five rehabilitation centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety-four stroke survivors were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Sensitivity to change was evaluated by comparing the percentages of participants who exceeded the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) for both the conventional and IMU tests. Responsiveness was assessed through hypotheses testing, utilizing both a criterion approach (external criterion: a 5-point retrospective Global Rating of Change score) and a construct approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At discharge, only 3.2% to 23.9% of the participants showed genuine improvement (ie, had a lower postural sway) on the IMU test, compared to 33% to 60% on the conventional tests. In total, 67.4% of the hypotheses were rejected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity to change and responsiveness of postural sway measurement in stroke survivors are limited. Restoring balance to achieve functional independence is not necessarily dependent on, or associated with, the level of postural sway. At present, integrating postural sway measurement into clinical stroke rehabilitation seems to provide no added value for monitoring balance.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>A novel approach to balance assessment in clinical stroke rehabilitation was investigated. It was found that while most participants improved in terms of functionality and independence, only a small percentage exhibited a significant change in postural sway. Therefore, postural sway may not effectively serve as an indicator of improved movement quality. This insight is crucial for both researchers and clinicians involved in neurorehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: During rehabilitation, stroke survivor's balance is commonly monitored using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Mini-BESTest. These tests evaluate the ability to maintain balance in an upright position while performing tasks. Currently, clinical practice lacks an adequate assessment of balance impairments like the increased postural sway post-stroke. Integrating postural sway measurement with a body-worn Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) could offer clinicians an objective, and rapid measurement method.
Objective: Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of postural sway measurement during stroke rehabilitation were explored.
Design: A longitudinal study was conducted.
Setting: Data were collected in five rehabilitation centers.
Participants: Ninety-four stroke survivors were included in the study.
Intervention: Sensitivity to change was evaluated by comparing the percentages of participants who exceeded the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) for both the conventional and IMU tests. Responsiveness was assessed through hypotheses testing, utilizing both a criterion approach (external criterion: a 5-point retrospective Global Rating of Change score) and a construct approach.
Results: At discharge, only 3.2% to 23.9% of the participants showed genuine improvement (ie, had a lower postural sway) on the IMU test, compared to 33% to 60% on the conventional tests. In total, 67.4% of the hypotheses were rejected.
Conclusions: The sensitivity to change and responsiveness of postural sway measurement in stroke survivors are limited. Restoring balance to achieve functional independence is not necessarily dependent on, or associated with, the level of postural sway. At present, integrating postural sway measurement into clinical stroke rehabilitation seems to provide no added value for monitoring balance.
Relevance: A novel approach to balance assessment in clinical stroke rehabilitation was investigated. It was found that while most participants improved in terms of functionality and independence, only a small percentage exhibited a significant change in postural sway. Therefore, postural sway may not effectively serve as an indicator of improved movement quality. This insight is crucial for both researchers and clinicians involved in neurorehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.