Postural Sway Measurement Using a Body-Worn Movement Sensor in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation: Exploring Sensitivity to Change and Responsiveness.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Marieke Geerars, Natasja C Wouda, Richard A W Felius, Johanna M A Visser-Meily, Martijn F Pisters, Michiel Punt
{"title":"Postural Sway Measurement Using a Body-Worn Movement Sensor in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation: Exploring Sensitivity to Change and Responsiveness.","authors":"Marieke Geerars, Natasja C Wouda, Richard A W Felius, Johanna M A Visser-Meily, Martijn F Pisters, Michiel Punt","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>During rehabilitation, stroke survivor's balance is commonly monitored using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Mini-BESTest. These tests evaluate the ability to maintain balance in an upright position while performing tasks. Currently, clinical practice lacks an adequate assessment of balance impairments like the increased postural sway post-stroke. Integrating postural sway measurement with a body-worn Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) could offer clinicians an objective, and rapid measurement method.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of postural sway measurement during stroke rehabilitation were explored.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A longitudinal study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data were collected in five rehabilitation centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety-four stroke survivors were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Sensitivity to change was evaluated by comparing the percentages of participants who exceeded the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) for both the conventional and IMU tests. Responsiveness was assessed through hypotheses testing, utilizing both a criterion approach (external criterion: a 5-point retrospective Global Rating of Change score) and a construct approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At discharge, only 3.2% to 23.9% of the participants showed genuine improvement (ie, had a lower postural sway) on the IMU test, compared to 33% to 60% on the conventional tests. In total, 67.4% of the hypotheses were rejected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity to change and responsiveness of postural sway measurement in stroke survivors are limited. Restoring balance to achieve functional independence is not necessarily dependent on, or associated with, the level of postural sway. At present, integrating postural sway measurement into clinical stroke rehabilitation seems to provide no added value for monitoring balance.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>A novel approach to balance assessment in clinical stroke rehabilitation was investigated. It was found that while most participants improved in terms of functionality and independence, only a small percentage exhibited a significant change in postural sway. Therefore, postural sway may not effectively serve as an indicator of improved movement quality. This insight is crucial for both researchers and clinicians involved in neurorehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: During rehabilitation, stroke survivor's balance is commonly monitored using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Mini-BESTest. These tests evaluate the ability to maintain balance in an upright position while performing tasks. Currently, clinical practice lacks an adequate assessment of balance impairments like the increased postural sway post-stroke. Integrating postural sway measurement with a body-worn Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) could offer clinicians an objective, and rapid measurement method.

Objective: Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of postural sway measurement during stroke rehabilitation were explored.

Design: A longitudinal study was conducted.

Setting: Data were collected in five rehabilitation centers.

Participants: Ninety-four stroke survivors were included in the study.

Intervention: Sensitivity to change was evaluated by comparing the percentages of participants who exceeded the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) for both the conventional and IMU tests. Responsiveness was assessed through hypotheses testing, utilizing both a criterion approach (external criterion: a 5-point retrospective Global Rating of Change score) and a construct approach.

Results: At discharge, only 3.2% to 23.9% of the participants showed genuine improvement (ie, had a lower postural sway) on the IMU test, compared to 33% to 60% on the conventional tests. In total, 67.4% of the hypotheses were rejected.

Conclusions: The sensitivity to change and responsiveness of postural sway measurement in stroke survivors are limited. Restoring balance to achieve functional independence is not necessarily dependent on, or associated with, the level of postural sway. At present, integrating postural sway measurement into clinical stroke rehabilitation seems to provide no added value for monitoring balance.

Relevance: A novel approach to balance assessment in clinical stroke rehabilitation was investigated. It was found that while most participants improved in terms of functionality and independence, only a small percentage exhibited a significant change in postural sway. Therefore, postural sway may not effectively serve as an indicator of improved movement quality. This insight is crucial for both researchers and clinicians involved in neurorehabilitation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信