Phoenix Sepsis Criteria in Critically Ill Children: Retrospective Validation Using a United States Nine-Center Dataset, 2012-2018.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003675
L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto, Latasha A Daniels, Mihir Atreya, E Vincent S Faustino, Reid W D Farris, Alon Geva, Robinder G Khemani, Colin Rogerson, Sareen S Shah, Scott L Weiss, Tellen D Bennett
{"title":"Phoenix Sepsis Criteria in Critically Ill Children: Retrospective Validation Using a United States Nine-Center Dataset, 2012-2018.","authors":"L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto, Latasha A Daniels, Mihir Atreya, E Vincent S Faustino, Reid W D Farris, Alon Geva, Robinder G Khemani, Colin Rogerson, Sareen S Shah, Scott L Weiss, Tellen D Bennett","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To perform: 1) external validation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score and Phoenix sepsis criteria in a multicenter cohort of critically ill children with infection and a comparison with the 2005 International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC) criteria; 2) a study of Phoenix sepsis criteria performance in patient subgroups based on age and comorbidities; 3) an assessment of microbiological profile of children with Phoenix sepsis; and 4) a study of the performance of the Phoenix-8 score.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary, retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort study from 2012 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nine PICUs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>PICU admissions with suspected infection.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 25,680 encounters of children with suspected or confirmed infection on PICU admission (4.6% in-hospital mortality), 11,168 (43%) met Phoenix criteria for sepsis or septic shock (9% in-hospital mortality). The Phoenix criteria generally outperformed the IPSCC criteria at discriminating mortality in all critically ill children with infections and across all subgroup analyses, including age group, malignancy, or technology dependence. Of 11,168 patients who met Phoenix criteria, 28% were negative for IPSCC criteria for sepsis and these had higher in-hospital mortality than those who met IPSCC sepsis criteria but not Phoenix criteria (4.7% vs.1.7%; p < 0.001), which was similar to the mortality of patients without sepsis (1.3%). Sepsis was associated with respiratory or bloodstream infection, most commonly Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus. The Phoenix-8 score had good discrimination of mortality in children with infections, comparable to or better than validated and widely used severity of illness and organ dysfunction scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 2012-2018, among U.S. patients with suspected or confirmed infection admitted to nine PICUs, those with the highest risk of mortality can be identified using the Phoenix sepsis criteria, including in children of different age groups and those with major comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e155-e165"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To perform: 1) external validation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score and Phoenix sepsis criteria in a multicenter cohort of critically ill children with infection and a comparison with the 2005 International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC) criteria; 2) a study of Phoenix sepsis criteria performance in patient subgroups based on age and comorbidities; 3) an assessment of microbiological profile of children with Phoenix sepsis; and 4) a study of the performance of the Phoenix-8 score.

Design: Secondary, retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort study from 2012 to 2018.

Setting: Nine PICUs in the United States.

Patients: PICU admissions with suspected infection.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Among 25,680 encounters of children with suspected or confirmed infection on PICU admission (4.6% in-hospital mortality), 11,168 (43%) met Phoenix criteria for sepsis or septic shock (9% in-hospital mortality). The Phoenix criteria generally outperformed the IPSCC criteria at discriminating mortality in all critically ill children with infections and across all subgroup analyses, including age group, malignancy, or technology dependence. Of 11,168 patients who met Phoenix criteria, 28% were negative for IPSCC criteria for sepsis and these had higher in-hospital mortality than those who met IPSCC sepsis criteria but not Phoenix criteria (4.7% vs.1.7%; p < 0.001), which was similar to the mortality of patients without sepsis (1.3%). Sepsis was associated with respiratory or bloodstream infection, most commonly Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus. The Phoenix-8 score had good discrimination of mortality in children with infections, comparable to or better than validated and widely used severity of illness and organ dysfunction scores.

Conclusions: In 2012-2018, among U.S. patients with suspected or confirmed infection admitted to nine PICUs, those with the highest risk of mortality can be identified using the Phoenix sepsis criteria, including in children of different age groups and those with major comorbidities.

危重儿童Phoenix脓毒症标准:2012-2018年美国九中心数据集回顾性验证
目的:进行:1)在感染的危重儿童多中心队列中对Phoenix脓毒症评分和Phoenix脓毒症标准进行外部验证,并与2005年国际儿童脓毒症共识会议(IPSCC)标准进行比较;2)基于年龄和合并症的患者亚组Phoenix脓毒症标准的研究;3)凤凰脓毒症患儿微生物学特征评估;4)对Phoenix-8评分的表现进行研究。设计:对2012年至2018年的多中心队列研究进行二次回顾性分析。环境:美国有9个picu。患者:PICU住院疑似感染。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:在25,680例PICU入院时疑似或确诊感染的儿童中(4.6%的住院死亡率),11168例(43%)符合凤凰标准的败血症或感染性休克(9%的住院死亡率)。凤凰标准在区分所有感染重症儿童的死亡率和所有亚组分析(包括年龄组、恶性肿瘤或技术依赖性)方面总体上优于IPSCC标准。在11168名符合凤凰标准的患者中,28%的IPSCC败血症标准呈阴性,这些患者的住院死亡率高于符合IPSCC败血症标准但不符合凤凰标准的患者(4.7% vs.1.7%;P < 0.001),与无脓毒症患者的死亡率(1.3%)相似。脓毒症与呼吸道或血液感染有关,最常见的是铜绿假单胞菌或金黄色葡萄球菌。Phoenix-8评分对感染儿童的死亡率有很好的辨别能力,与广泛使用的疾病严重程度评分和器官功能障碍评分相当或更好。结论:2012-2018年,在美国9个picu收治的疑似或确诊感染患者中,使用Phoenix脓毒症标准可以识别出死亡风险最高的患者,包括不同年龄组的儿童和有主要合并症的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信