A Survey-Based Evaluation of Resistance Training Prescription Practices, Knowledge, and Attitudes Among Family Physicians.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Daniel Herstain, Yedidya Silverman, Shoham Baruch, Ilan Green, Uri Obolski, Israel Halperin
{"title":"A Survey-Based Evaluation of Resistance Training Prescription Practices, Knowledge, and Attitudes Among Family Physicians.","authors":"Daniel Herstain, Yedidya Silverman, Shoham Baruch, Ilan Green, Uri Obolski, Israel Halperin","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2024-0616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the well-established benefits of resistance training (RT) in reducing health risks and enhancing quality of life, adherence to RT guidelines remains low. Promoting RT through healthcare practitioners could facilitate its widespread adoption. Although numerous studies have examined healthcare practitioners' knowledge and prescription practices of physical activity, few have specifically focused on RT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prescription practices and barriers, knowledge and attitudes toward RT, and attitudes toward RT education were assessed from a convenience sample recruited by a multichannel approach (eg, social media and mailing lists). Physicians answered an online questionnaire composed of 32 questions developed by a multidisciplinary team. A convenience sample was recruited through social media and mailing lists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 158 family physicians practicing in Israel completed the questionnaire. RT prescription rates were low, ranging from 16.9% to 31.9%, depending on the estimation method. Self-reported barriers to RT prescription included insufficient knowledge about RT and how to prescribe it. Physicians showed limited knowledge of RT guidelines but generally viewed RT positively for various health conditions. Finally, 83.5% felt inadequately trained in RT, and 88.6% expressed a desire for further education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights a gap between the recognized benefits of RT and the prescription practices and knowledge of family physicians. Enhanced educational efforts targeting RT could bridge this gap, potentially increasing RT prescription rates and improving public health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the well-established benefits of resistance training (RT) in reducing health risks and enhancing quality of life, adherence to RT guidelines remains low. Promoting RT through healthcare practitioners could facilitate its widespread adoption. Although numerous studies have examined healthcare practitioners' knowledge and prescription practices of physical activity, few have specifically focused on RT.

Methods: Prescription practices and barriers, knowledge and attitudes toward RT, and attitudes toward RT education were assessed from a convenience sample recruited by a multichannel approach (eg, social media and mailing lists). Physicians answered an online questionnaire composed of 32 questions developed by a multidisciplinary team. A convenience sample was recruited through social media and mailing lists.

Results: A total of 158 family physicians practicing in Israel completed the questionnaire. RT prescription rates were low, ranging from 16.9% to 31.9%, depending on the estimation method. Self-reported barriers to RT prescription included insufficient knowledge about RT and how to prescribe it. Physicians showed limited knowledge of RT guidelines but generally viewed RT positively for various health conditions. Finally, 83.5% felt inadequately trained in RT, and 88.6% expressed a desire for further education.

Conclusions: This study highlights a gap between the recognized benefits of RT and the prescription practices and knowledge of family physicians. Enhanced educational efforts targeting RT could bridge this gap, potentially increasing RT prescription rates and improving public health outcomes.

基于调查的家庭医生抗阻训练处方实践、知识和态度评价。
背景:尽管阻力训练(RT)在降低健康风险和提高生活质量方面的益处已得到公认,但对RT指南的依从性仍然很低。通过医疗从业者推广RT可以促进其广泛采用。虽然有大量的研究调查了医疗保健从业者对体育活动的知识和处方实践,但很少有专门关注体育锻炼的研究。方法:处方实践和障碍,对体育锻炼的知识和态度,以及对体育锻炼教育的态度,通过多渠道方法(如社交媒体和邮件列表)从方便样本中进行评估。医生们回答了一份由32个问题组成的在线问卷,该问卷由一个多学科团队开发。通过社交媒体和邮件列表招募方便样本。结果:共有158名在以色列执业的家庭医生完成了问卷。RT处方率较低,根据不同的估计方法,在16.9% ~ 31.9%之间。自我报告的RT处方障碍包括对RT和如何开RT的知识不足。医生对放疗指南的了解有限,但普遍认为放疗对各种健康状况都是积极的。最后,83.5%的人认为在RT方面没有得到充分的培训,88.6%的人表示希望继续接受教育。结论:本研究突出了RT的公认效益与家庭医生的处方实践和知识之间的差距。加强针对RT的教育工作可以弥补这一差距,潜在地提高RT处方率并改善公共卫生结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信