Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitors on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Institutional Financial Assistance.

IF 4.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Kevin K Cheng, Maxine F Vera Cruz, Tracy S Tylee, Mary S Kelly
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitors on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Institutional Financial Assistance.","authors":"Kevin K Cheng, Maxine F Vera Cruz, Tracy S Tylee, Mary S Kelly","doi":"10.1177/19322968251320122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines suggest utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to improve hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) in patients with diabetes. Financial cost remains a barrier to implementation. Medicare coverage criteria include all patients with diabetes treated with at least one injection of insulin per day, while Washington Medicaid is more restrictive. There remains a paucity of literature examining effectiveness of CGMs on clinical outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes with lower incomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study including adults with type 2 diabetes receiving institutional financial assistance for CGMs. A cohort with no CGM use is included for comparison. The primary outcome is change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> approximately three months after CGM implementation from baseline. Secondary outcomes include mean differences in number of antidiabetic agents and changes in insulin dose prior to and after CGM implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the CGM cohort, most patients were of Hispanic ethnicity (77%) and a majority had no insurance (77%). The average HbA<sub>1c</sub> prior to CGM implementation was 8.3% and three months post-CGM was 7.7%, with a mean difference of -0.6% (<i>P</i> = .004). There were no statistically significant differences in the average number of antidiabetic agents, total daily dosages of insulin, or mean differences in the number of emergency room visits or hospitalizations prior to and post-implementation of a CGM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, there is a statistical and clinical improvement in HbA<sub>1c</sub> before and after implementation of CGMs in patients with type 2 diabetes who meet Medicaid criteria for CGM coverage receiving financial assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968251320122"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251320122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines suggest utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to improve hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with diabetes. Financial cost remains a barrier to implementation. Medicare coverage criteria include all patients with diabetes treated with at least one injection of insulin per day, while Washington Medicaid is more restrictive. There remains a paucity of literature examining effectiveness of CGMs on clinical outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes with lower incomes.

Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study including adults with type 2 diabetes receiving institutional financial assistance for CGMs. A cohort with no CGM use is included for comparison. The primary outcome is change in HbA1c approximately three months after CGM implementation from baseline. Secondary outcomes include mean differences in number of antidiabetic agents and changes in insulin dose prior to and after CGM implementation.

Results: Among the CGM cohort, most patients were of Hispanic ethnicity (77%) and a majority had no insurance (77%). The average HbA1c prior to CGM implementation was 8.3% and three months post-CGM was 7.7%, with a mean difference of -0.6% (P = .004). There were no statistically significant differences in the average number of antidiabetic agents, total daily dosages of insulin, or mean differences in the number of emergency room visits or hospitalizations prior to and post-implementation of a CGM.

Conclusion: Overall, there is a statistical and clinical improvement in HbA1c before and after implementation of CGMs in patients with type 2 diabetes who meet Medicaid criteria for CGM coverage receiving financial assistance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信