Adjusting EWS scores for altitude above sea level: is it necessary to predict sepsis mortality in the emergency room?

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
German Devia Jaramillo, Lilia Erazo Guerrero
{"title":"Adjusting EWS scores for altitude above sea level: is it necessary to predict sepsis mortality in the emergency room?","authors":"German Devia Jaramillo, Lilia Erazo Guerrero","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00761-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis mortality can be significantly reduced with early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. It is crucial to have tools that enable the early identification of patients at high risk of sepsis mortality from the triage stage. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and recently the International Early Warning Score (IEWS), are widely used for this purpose. However, its oxygenation parameters are primarily validated in populations at sea level. Given that patient oxygenation varies with altitude, there is a need to investigate the applicability of this scores at different altitudes. The purpose of this study is to compare the discriminatory capacity of sepsis mortality in emergency departments between the standard NEWS and IEWS scale and a NEWS and IEWS scale adjusted for barometric pressure in Bogotá, a city located 2600 m above sea level. A prospective recruitment was conducted in the triage area of the emergency department, including all patients with suspected sepsis. The scales under evaluation were calculated. Subsequently, the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and areas under the curve (AUC) of each scale were assessed for mortality prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 304 patients were recruited. The overall mortality rate was 19.4% and the septic shock mortality rate was 59.3%. The AUC for the standard NEWS was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.83), and for the standard IEWS was 0.81(95% CI: 0.75-0.87), altitude-adjusted NEWS, it was 0.79(95% CI: 0.73-0.84), and for the altitude-adjusted IEWS was 0.82(95% CI: 0.76-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjustment of oxygen saturation for altitude above sea level in NEWS (NEWSa) does not improve its predictive capacity for mortality in patients with sepsis in the emergency department, however, this same adjustment in the IEWS value significantly improves the predictive capacity compared to NEWS and NEWSa.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00761-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis mortality can be significantly reduced with early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. It is crucial to have tools that enable the early identification of patients at high risk of sepsis mortality from the triage stage. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and recently the International Early Warning Score (IEWS), are widely used for this purpose. However, its oxygenation parameters are primarily validated in populations at sea level. Given that patient oxygenation varies with altitude, there is a need to investigate the applicability of this scores at different altitudes. The purpose of this study is to compare the discriminatory capacity of sepsis mortality in emergency departments between the standard NEWS and IEWS scale and a NEWS and IEWS scale adjusted for barometric pressure in Bogotá, a city located 2600 m above sea level. A prospective recruitment was conducted in the triage area of the emergency department, including all patients with suspected sepsis. The scales under evaluation were calculated. Subsequently, the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and areas under the curve (AUC) of each scale were assessed for mortality prediction.

Results: A total of 304 patients were recruited. The overall mortality rate was 19.4% and the septic shock mortality rate was 59.3%. The AUC for the standard NEWS was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.83), and for the standard IEWS was 0.81(95% CI: 0.75-0.87), altitude-adjusted NEWS, it was 0.79(95% CI: 0.73-0.84), and for the altitude-adjusted IEWS was 0.82(95% CI: 0.76-0.88).

Conclusions: Adjustment of oxygen saturation for altitude above sea level in NEWS (NEWSa) does not improve its predictive capacity for mortality in patients with sepsis in the emergency department, however, this same adjustment in the IEWS value significantly improves the predictive capacity compared to NEWS and NEWSa.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信