Optimal hemoglobin threshold for blood transfusions in sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chairat Permpikul, Jakpanee Tanksinmankhong, Surat Tongyoo, Thummaporn Naorungroj, Tanuwong Viarasilpa, Khemajira Karaketklang
{"title":"Optimal hemoglobin threshold for blood transfusions in sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Chairat Permpikul, Jakpanee Tanksinmankhong, Surat Tongyoo, Thummaporn Naorungroj, Tanuwong Viarasilpa, Khemajira Karaketklang","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-03889-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transfusions of red blood cells (RBCs) are crucial for improving tissue oxygenation in anemic patients with sepsis. Nevertheless, the debate continues over the ideal hemoglobin level for transfusions. This study aimed to assess the impact of different hemoglobin levels on the outcomes of patients with sepsis who received transfusions. This retrospective analysis included adult patients with sepsis treated in the general medical ward and intensive care unit at a University affiliate hospital. Patients needing RBC transfusions were included. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. From March 2018 to January 2022, 806 patients were studied. Of these, 480 (59.6%) were transfused at hemoglobin levels of 7-9 g/dL (\"liberal group\"), while 326 (40.4%) received RBC transfusions when their hemoglobin was < 7 g/dL (\"restrictive group\"). Mean hemoglobin levels at transfusion were 8.1 ± 0.8 g/dL and 6.3 ± 0.8 g/dL for each group, respectively(P < 0.001). On day 28, the liberal group had a mortality rate of 51.2% (246 patients), compared to 59.2% (193 patients) in the restrictive group (Odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.98, P = 0.031). Adjusted comparisons showed 46.8% mortality in the liberal group (141/301patients) versus 59.3% in the restrictive group (178/300patients) at 28 days (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed transfusion at hemoglobin 7-9 g/dL as an independent variable linked to lower 28-day mortality (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-0.99, P = 0.042). Other factors correlated with 28-day mortality were platelet counts ≤ 150 × 10<sup>3</sup>/µL, albumin ≤ 2.5 g/dL, shock, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapy. This retrospective study suggests that RBC transfusion at hemoglobin levels of 7-9 g/dL associates with lower 28-day mortality in sepsis patients compared to transfusion at hemoglobin levels below 7 g/dL.Clinical trial registrationThe study was registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (identification number TCTR20231003003). ( https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20231003003 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-03889-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transfusions of red blood cells (RBCs) are crucial for improving tissue oxygenation in anemic patients with sepsis. Nevertheless, the debate continues over the ideal hemoglobin level for transfusions. This study aimed to assess the impact of different hemoglobin levels on the outcomes of patients with sepsis who received transfusions. This retrospective analysis included adult patients with sepsis treated in the general medical ward and intensive care unit at a University affiliate hospital. Patients needing RBC transfusions were included. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. From March 2018 to January 2022, 806 patients were studied. Of these, 480 (59.6%) were transfused at hemoglobin levels of 7-9 g/dL ("liberal group"), while 326 (40.4%) received RBC transfusions when their hemoglobin was < 7 g/dL ("restrictive group"). Mean hemoglobin levels at transfusion were 8.1 ± 0.8 g/dL and 6.3 ± 0.8 g/dL for each group, respectively(P < 0.001). On day 28, the liberal group had a mortality rate of 51.2% (246 patients), compared to 59.2% (193 patients) in the restrictive group (Odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.98, P = 0.031). Adjusted comparisons showed 46.8% mortality in the liberal group (141/301patients) versus 59.3% in the restrictive group (178/300patients) at 28 days (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed transfusion at hemoglobin 7-9 g/dL as an independent variable linked to lower 28-day mortality (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-0.99, P = 0.042). Other factors correlated with 28-day mortality were platelet counts ≤ 150 × 103/µL, albumin ≤ 2.5 g/dL, shock, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapy. This retrospective study suggests that RBC transfusion at hemoglobin levels of 7-9 g/dL associates with lower 28-day mortality in sepsis patients compared to transfusion at hemoglobin levels below 7 g/dL.Clinical trial registrationThe study was registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (identification number TCTR20231003003). ( https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20231003003 ).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信