Ludovico Carrino, Erica Reinhard, Mauricio Avendano
{"title":"There Is No Place Like Home: The Impact of Public Home-Based Care on the Mental Health and Well-Being of Older People.","authors":"Ludovico Carrino, Erica Reinhard, Mauricio Avendano","doi":"10.1002/hec.4948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite a significant policy shift from institutional to home-based care for older adults, evidence on the effectiveness of policies incentivizing home care is limited. This study provides novel evidence on the causal effect of public home-based care on the mental health and well-being of older people. To address endogenous selection, we implement a novel instrumental variable approach that exploits eligibility rules for long-term care as defined in national legislations. We link longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Aging & Retirement in Europe (SHARE, 2004-2017) to national LTC eligibility rules in France, Germany, Spain and Belgium (disaggregated for Wallonia and Flanders regions) and examine how exogenous variation in the use of long-term care caused by varying eligibility rules impacts depressive symptoms (EURO-D scale), quality of life (CASP scale) and loneliness (R-UCLA scale). We find that receiving formal home-based care significantly reduces depressive symptom scores by 2.6 points (large effect size measured by Cohen's d) and the risk of depression by 13 percentage points. The use of home-based formal care also increases quality of life as measured by the CASP scale, particularly by increasing feelings of control over life. We show that one potential mechanism involves the impact of home-based care on loneliness: we estimate that receiving formal home-based care reduces the risk of loneliness by 6.7 percentage points. Our results provide evidence that an increase in home-based care coverage is justified in terms of improved mental health and well-being outcomes for older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite a significant policy shift from institutional to home-based care for older adults, evidence on the effectiveness of policies incentivizing home care is limited. This study provides novel evidence on the causal effect of public home-based care on the mental health and well-being of older people. To address endogenous selection, we implement a novel instrumental variable approach that exploits eligibility rules for long-term care as defined in national legislations. We link longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Aging & Retirement in Europe (SHARE, 2004-2017) to national LTC eligibility rules in France, Germany, Spain and Belgium (disaggregated for Wallonia and Flanders regions) and examine how exogenous variation in the use of long-term care caused by varying eligibility rules impacts depressive symptoms (EURO-D scale), quality of life (CASP scale) and loneliness (R-UCLA scale). We find that receiving formal home-based care significantly reduces depressive symptom scores by 2.6 points (large effect size measured by Cohen's d) and the risk of depression by 13 percentage points. The use of home-based formal care also increases quality of life as measured by the CASP scale, particularly by increasing feelings of control over life. We show that one potential mechanism involves the impact of home-based care on loneliness: we estimate that receiving formal home-based care reduces the risk of loneliness by 6.7 percentage points. Our results provide evidence that an increase in home-based care coverage is justified in terms of improved mental health and well-being outcomes for older people.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.