There Is No Place Like Home: The Impact of Public Home-Based Care on the Mental Health and Well-Being of Older People

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1002/hec.4948
Ludovico Carrino, Erica Reinhard, Mauricio Avendano
{"title":"There Is No Place Like Home: The Impact of Public Home-Based Care on the Mental Health and Well-Being of Older People","authors":"Ludovico Carrino,&nbsp;Erica Reinhard,&nbsp;Mauricio Avendano","doi":"10.1002/hec.4948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite a significant policy shift from institutional to home-based care for older adults, evidence on the effectiveness of policies incentivizing home care is limited. This study provides novel evidence on the causal effect of public home-based care on the mental health and well-being of older people. To address endogenous selection, we implement a novel instrumental variable approach that exploits eligibility rules for long-term care as defined in national legislations. We link longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Aging &amp; Retirement in Europe (SHARE, 2004–2017) to national LTC eligibility rules in France, Germany, Spain and Belgium (disaggregated for Wallonia and Flanders regions) and examine how exogenous variation in the use of long-term care caused by varying eligibility rules impacts depressive symptoms (EURO-D scale), quality of life (CASP scale) and loneliness (R-UCLA scale). We find that receiving formal home-based care significantly reduces depressive symptom scores by 2.6 points (large effect size measured by Cohen's d) and the risk of depression by 13 percentage points. The use of home-based formal care also increases quality of life as measured by the CASP scale, particularly by increasing feelings of control over life. We show that one potential mechanism involves the impact of home-based care on loneliness: we estimate that receiving formal home-based care reduces the risk of loneliness by 6.7 percentage points. Our results provide evidence that an increase in home-based care coverage is justified in terms of improved mental health and well-being outcomes for older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 6","pages":"1085-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hec.4948","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a significant policy shift from institutional to home-based care for older adults, evidence on the effectiveness of policies incentivizing home care is limited. This study provides novel evidence on the causal effect of public home-based care on the mental health and well-being of older people. To address endogenous selection, we implement a novel instrumental variable approach that exploits eligibility rules for long-term care as defined in national legislations. We link longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Aging & Retirement in Europe (SHARE, 2004–2017) to national LTC eligibility rules in France, Germany, Spain and Belgium (disaggregated for Wallonia and Flanders regions) and examine how exogenous variation in the use of long-term care caused by varying eligibility rules impacts depressive symptoms (EURO-D scale), quality of life (CASP scale) and loneliness (R-UCLA scale). We find that receiving formal home-based care significantly reduces depressive symptom scores by 2.6 points (large effect size measured by Cohen's d) and the risk of depression by 13 percentage points. The use of home-based formal care also increases quality of life as measured by the CASP scale, particularly by increasing feelings of control over life. We show that one potential mechanism involves the impact of home-based care on loneliness: we estimate that receiving formal home-based care reduces the risk of loneliness by 6.7 percentage points. Our results provide evidence that an increase in home-based care coverage is justified in terms of improved mental health and well-being outcomes for older people.

Abstract Image

没有地方像家:公共家庭护理对老年人心理健康和福祉的影响。
尽管老年人从机构护理到家庭护理的重大政策转变,但关于激励家庭护理的政策有效性的证据有限。本研究为公共家庭护理对老年人心理健康和幸福感的因果关系提供了新的证据。为了解决内生选择,我们实施了一种新的工具变量方法,利用国家立法中定义的长期护理资格规则。我们将欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE, 2004-2017)的纵向数据与法国、德国、西班牙和比利时的国家LTC资格规则(瓦隆尼亚和法兰德斯地区的分类)联系起来,并研究由不同资格规则引起的长期护理使用的外生变化如何影响抑郁症状(EURO-D量表)、生活质量(CASP量表)和孤独感(R-UCLA量表)。我们发现,接受正式的家庭护理显著降低抑郁症状得分2.6分(Cohen's d测量的大效应量),抑郁风险降低13个百分点。使用以家庭为基础的正规护理也可以提高生活质量,特别是通过增加对生活的控制感来衡量。我们发现一个潜在的机制涉及到家庭护理对孤独感的影响:我们估计接受正式的家庭护理可以降低6.7个百分点的孤独感风险。我们的研究结果提供了证据,证明在改善老年人的心理健康和福祉结果方面,家庭护理覆盖面的增加是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信