The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecologic Oncology Decision Making: A Feasibility Study.

IF 2 4区医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1159/000544751

Iason Psilopatis, Nadezda Sipulina, Frederik A Stuebs, Felix Heindl, Patrik Poeschke, Simon Bader, Annika Krueckel, Peter A Fasching, Matthias W Beckmann, Julius Emons

{"title":"The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecologic Oncology Decision Making: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Iason Psilopatis, Nadezda Sipulina, Frederik A Stuebs, Felix Heindl, Patrik Poeschke, Simon Bader, Annika Krueckel, Peter A Fasching, Matthias W Beckmann, Julius Emons","doi":"10.1159/000544751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To examine the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in gynecologic oncology decision making.Design: Feasibility study.Setting: Fictive.Participants: Fictitious case vignettes of gynecologic carcinomas.Methods: Fictitious case vignettes of gynecologic carcinomas were created and evaluated by physicians with varying levels of professional experience, as well as by language models including Chat-GPT 4.0, Google Gemini, and Bing-Copilot. Treatment approval decisions were based on standardized clinical and laboratory criteria.Results: Two cases of breast cancer, one case of ovarian cancer, one case of cervical cancer and one case of endometrial cancer were evaluated. All three language models were able to evaluate all clinical cases and make therapy-relevant suggestions, with Chat-GPT providing the most clear and concise recommendations that were in three cases totally consistent with physician assessments.Conclusions: The study demonstrates that AI models, such as Chat-GPT, can to some extent evaluate clinical cases, recognize clinical and/or laboratory abnormalities and make therapy-related suggestions. Despite high overall agreement, differences were predominantly noted in the more complex cases, rendering human interpretation necessary. The findings underscore the benefits of AI in terms of clarity, time efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Future research should further explore the application of AI to real patient data and development of hybrid decision models to optimize integration into clinical practice.Limitations: Feasibility study with five fictitious case vignettes.","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in gynecologic oncology decision making.

Design: Feasibility study.

Setting: Fictive.

Participants: Fictitious case vignettes of gynecologic carcinomas.

Methods: Fictitious case vignettes of gynecologic carcinomas were created and evaluated by physicians with varying levels of professional experience, as well as by language models including Chat-GPT 4.0, Google Gemini, and Bing-Copilot. Treatment approval decisions were based on standardized clinical and laboratory criteria.

Results: Two cases of breast cancer, one case of ovarian cancer, one case of cervical cancer and one case of endometrial cancer were evaluated. All three language models were able to evaluate all clinical cases and make therapy-relevant suggestions, with Chat-GPT providing the most clear and concise recommendations that were in three cases totally consistent with physician assessments.

Conclusions: The study demonstrates that AI models, such as Chat-GPT, can to some extent evaluate clinical cases, recognize clinical and/or laboratory abnormalities and make therapy-related suggestions. Despite high overall agreement, differences were predominantly noted in the more complex cases, rendering human interpretation necessary. The findings underscore the benefits of AI in terms of clarity, time efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Future research should further explore the application of AI to real patient data and development of hybrid decision models to optimize integration into clinical practice.

Limitations: Feasibility study with five fictitious case vignettes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.