{"title":"Adverse events associated with inclisiran: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).","authors":"Bing Li, Yan Chen, Yongyi Zhang, Mengying Qian, Qing Shan, Jiao Qian, Jinmin Guo","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To gain an improved comprehension of inclisiran safety in real-world settings by data mining from FAERS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were gathered between 1 December 2020 and 31 December 2023. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) corresponding preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC) were used to categorize adverse medication reactions in AE reports (AERs). By using reported odds ratio (ROR) method, positive signals were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2,652 reports of inclisiran, and 150 of those AEs had significant disproportionality. Among the 44 PTs with moderate clinical priority, 35 PTs were discovered on the medicine label, including 12 IMEs and 2 DMEs. Of note, 9 PTs were unanticipated AEs that were not discovered in the medication label or reported clinical studies, such as movement disorder (ROR: 3.05; 95%CI: 1.73,5.37), aphonia (ROR: 3.77; 95%CI: 1.79,7.91), and pulmonary congestion (ROR: 3.47; 95%CI: 1.44,8.34). Inclisiran was found to be related to 12 serious AEs. The median TTO of 1896 cases was 13.5 (IQR 0-100) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified not only known AEs, but also new AE signals such as movement disorder. However, signals does not reveal actual risk, prospective clinical trials are still required to verify their causal connection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2468855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To gain an improved comprehension of inclisiran safety in real-world settings by data mining from FAERS.
Methods: Data were gathered between 1 December 2020 and 31 December 2023. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) corresponding preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC) were used to categorize adverse medication reactions in AE reports (AERs). By using reported odds ratio (ROR) method, positive signals were identified.
Results: There were 2,652 reports of inclisiran, and 150 of those AEs had significant disproportionality. Among the 44 PTs with moderate clinical priority, 35 PTs were discovered on the medicine label, including 12 IMEs and 2 DMEs. Of note, 9 PTs were unanticipated AEs that were not discovered in the medication label or reported clinical studies, such as movement disorder (ROR: 3.05; 95%CI: 1.73,5.37), aphonia (ROR: 3.77; 95%CI: 1.79,7.91), and pulmonary congestion (ROR: 3.47; 95%CI: 1.44,8.34). Inclisiran was found to be related to 12 serious AEs. The median TTO of 1896 cases was 13.5 (IQR 0-100) days.
Conclusion: We identified not only known AEs, but also new AE signals such as movement disorder. However, signals does not reveal actual risk, prospective clinical trials are still required to verify their causal connection.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.