An economic evaluation of pre-discharge home assessment visits following hip fracture: Analysis from a randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1177/02692155241312065
Kylee J Lockwood, Nicholas F Taylor, Katherine E Harding, Natasha K Brusco
{"title":"An economic evaluation of pre-discharge home assessment visits following hip fracture: Analysis from a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Kylee J Lockwood, Nicholas F Taylor, Katherine E Harding, Natasha K Brusco","doi":"10.1177/02692155241312065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo investigate cost-effectiveness of pre-discharge home assessment visits for patients recovering after hip fracture.DesignCost-effectiveness analysis completed alongside a randomised controlled trial.SettingHospital wards and the community.ParticipantsAdults 50 years and over with hip fractures planning to return home.InterventionParticipants were randomised to either usual-care hospital-based discharge planning or usual-care hospital-based discharge planning with a pre-discharge home assessment visit by an occupational therapist.Main measuresFunctional Independence Measure, EQ-5D-3L, and number of falls. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for changes at 30 days and 6 months.ResultsSeventy-seven patients participated. Compared to usual care, the home assessment group likely had fewer falls at 30 days (incidence rate ratio = 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 1.11) and increased functional independence at 6 months (11.2 units, 95% CI 4.2 to 18.2) but no difference in quality of life (0.0 units, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.1). The mean cost to provide a home assessment visit was A$135.70. A mean cost saving of A$6182 (95% CI -$6414 to $18,777) favoured the home assessment group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio found a saving of A$71,337 (95% CI -$998,930 to $411,409) in achieving clinically important changes in functional independence for the home assessment group at 6 months and a saving of A$34,832 (95% CI -$331,344 to $213,900) per fall avoided in favour of the home assessment group at 30 days.ConclusionFrom a health service perspective, pre-discharge home assessments for patients after hip fracture are likely to be cost-effective in restoring functional independence and reducing falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"437-446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241312065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate cost-effectiveness of pre-discharge home assessment visits for patients recovering after hip fracture.DesignCost-effectiveness analysis completed alongside a randomised controlled trial.SettingHospital wards and the community.ParticipantsAdults 50 years and over with hip fractures planning to return home.InterventionParticipants were randomised to either usual-care hospital-based discharge planning or usual-care hospital-based discharge planning with a pre-discharge home assessment visit by an occupational therapist.Main measuresFunctional Independence Measure, EQ-5D-3L, and number of falls. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for changes at 30 days and 6 months.ResultsSeventy-seven patients participated. Compared to usual care, the home assessment group likely had fewer falls at 30 days (incidence rate ratio = 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 1.11) and increased functional independence at 6 months (11.2 units, 95% CI 4.2 to 18.2) but no difference in quality of life (0.0 units, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.1). The mean cost to provide a home assessment visit was A$135.70. A mean cost saving of A$6182 (95% CI -$6414 to $18,777) favoured the home assessment group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio found a saving of A$71,337 (95% CI -$998,930 to $411,409) in achieving clinically important changes in functional independence for the home assessment group at 6 months and a saving of A$34,832 (95% CI -$331,344 to $213,900) per fall avoided in favour of the home assessment group at 30 days.ConclusionFrom a health service perspective, pre-discharge home assessments for patients after hip fracture are likely to be cost-effective in restoring functional independence and reducing falls.

髋部骨折后出院前家访的经济评价:一项随机对照试验分析。
目的:探讨髋部骨折患者出院前家访的成本-效果。设计:成本-效果分析与随机对照试验同时完成。环境:医院病房和社区。参与者:50岁及以上髋部骨折准备回家的成年人。干预:参与者被随机分配到以医院为基础的常规护理出院计划或以医院为基础的常规护理出院计划,并由职业治疗师进行出院前家庭评估访问。主要测量指标:功能独立性、EQ-5D-3L、跌倒次数。计算30天和6个月变化的增量成本-效果比。结果:77例患者参与。与常规护理相比,家庭评估组在30天内跌倒的次数可能更少(发病率比= 0.41,95%可信区间(CI) 0.15至1.11),在6个月时功能独立性增加(11.2个单位,95% CI 4.2至18.2),但生活质量没有差异(0.0个单位,95% CI -0.1至0.1)。提供一次家庭评估访问的平均费用为135.70澳元。家庭评估组的平均成本节省为6182澳元(95% CI - 6414至18777美元)。增量成本-效果比发现,在6个月时,家庭评估组在实现功能独立性的临床重要改变方面节省了71,337澳元(95% CI - 998,930美元至411,409美元),而在30天时,家庭评估组每次避免跌倒节省了34,832澳元(95% CI - 331,344美元至213,900美元)。结论:从卫生服务的角度来看,对髋部骨折患者进行出院前家庭评估在恢复功能独立和减少跌倒方面可能具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信