Leptin Enhances M1 Macrophage Polarization and Impairs Tendon-Bone Healing in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Rat Model.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yinghao Li, Lei Yao, Yizhou Huang, Long Pang, Chunsen Zhang, Tao Li, Duan Wang, Kai Zhou, Jian Li, Xin Tang
{"title":"Leptin Enhances M1 Macrophage Polarization and Impairs Tendon-Bone Healing in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Rat Model.","authors":"Yinghao Li, Lei Yao, Yizhou Huang, Long Pang, Chunsen Zhang, Tao Li, Duan Wang, Kai Zhou, Jian Li, Xin Tang","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff tears are common, affecting more than 60% of individuals older than 80 years, and they have been implicated in 70% of patients with shoulder pain. M1 polarization-related inflammation has been reported to be associated with poor healing outcomes of rotator cuff injury, and leptin, an adipokine, has been reported to be a potential activator of inflammation. However, whether leptin affects rotator cuff repair remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>Using in vitro cell experiments and an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model, we therefore asked: (1) Does leptin promote the M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro and in vivo? (2) Does leptin impair biomechanical strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, bone mineral density (BMD), or gait in the rotator cuff tear scenario? (3) Does leptin promote M1 polarization by upregulating the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) pathway?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The impact of leptin on M1 macrophage polarization in vitro was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the Western blot test, and immunofluorescence staining. The effect of leptin on tendon-bone healing was assessed in an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model by comparing a leptin group with a suture group in terms of gait, biomechanical tensile strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, and BMD. In the in vivo experiments, 8-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were used, adapting a previously developed rat rotator cuff tear model. The supraspinatus tendon was resected from the greater tuberosity bilaterally, and then the tendon was secured to its anatomical footprint using the transosseous single-row technique. In total, 30 rats were randomized into two groups (suture, leptin) by drawing lots (15 rats in each group). They were assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the surgery. In the suture group, 100 µL of normal saline was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. In the leptin group, 100 µL of leptin solution (200 ng/mL) was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. Biomechanical properties including maximal failure load, stiffness, and tensile failure stress were determined to assess the biomechanical strength at 4 and 8 weeks after the surgery. Histologic staining was conducted to compare the structure of the tendon-bone interface between treatment groups. Micro-MRI and micro-CT assessments were conducted to compare the overall healing outcome and BMD between treatment groups. Gait analysis was conducted to compare the stride length and strength between treatment groups. M1 macrophage polarization in vivo at the tendon-bone interface was assessed by immunofluorescence staining. Finally, to explore the underlying mechanism of the effects of leptin, Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) was used to block the TNF signaling pathway in the in vitro macrophage study, and RT-PCR and Western blot were used to explore the underlying mechanism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leptin enhanced LPS-induced M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro, showing increased gene expression of CD86, Nos2, and TNF-α as well as increased protein expression of CD86, TNF-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and inducible NO synthase (iNOS). The in vivo polarization showed that the M1 polarization of macrophages at the tendon-bone interface was promoted. At 2 weeks postoperatively, there were more M1 cells in the leptin group (53 ± 5 versus 77 ± 8, mean difference 24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 11 to 37]; p = 0.002), although the proportion of M1 cells (ratio of the number of M1 cells to the total number of macrophages) was not higher (18.6% ± 2.9% versus 21.5% ± 1.7%, mean difference 2.9% [95% CI -2.8% to 8.7%]; p = 0.36). At 4 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group exhibited more M1 cells (31 ± 4 versus 50 ± 6, mean difference 19 [95% CI 6 to 32]; p = 0.008) and at a higher proportion (16.4% ± 2.6% versus 23.0% ± 3.0%, mean difference 6.6% [95% CI 0.8% to 12.4%]; p = 0.03). The in vivo experiments showed that leptin impaired tendon-bone healing. At 4 weeks postoperatively, the biomechanical properties of both groups were not different in terms of maximal failure load (12.7 ± 1.6 N versus 12.4 ± 1.8 N, mean difference -0.3 N [95% CI -2.6 to 1.8]; p = 0.91), stiffness (5.1 ± 0.7 N/mm versus 4.6 ± 0.8 N/mm, mean difference -0.5 N/mm [95% CI -1.3 to 0.5]; p = 0.44), and tensile failure stress (2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm2 versus 2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm2, mean difference 0.0 N/mm2 [95% CI -0.4 to 0.4]; p = 0.99). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group showed worse maximal failure load (17.6 ± 1.4 N versus 14.1 ± 1.4 N, mean difference -3.5 N [95% CI -5.7 to -1.3]; p = 0.002), stiffness (7.0 ± 0.6 N/mm versus 5.2 ± 0.6 N/mm, mean difference -1.8 N/mm [95% CI -2.7 to -0.9]; p < 0.001), and tensile failure stress (3.4 ± 0.3 N/mm2 versus 2.8 ± 0.4 N/mm2, mean difference -0.6 N/mm2 [95% CI -1.0 to -0.2]; p = 0.007). Results of histologic staining, image assessments, and gait analysis also demonstrated that leptin impaired the healing process. In vitro experiments showed that leptin upregulated the gene expression of molecules in the TNF pathway, including CCL2 and receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), and M1 markers, such as TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2; the addition of Nec-1 neutralized the effect of leptin on macrophage polarization, reducing the expression of M1 markers, including TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2, and blocking the TNF signaling pathway, including CCL2 and RIPK. The protein expression exhibited similar trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results of this study, leptin appears to impair tendon-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff tear, promote M1 macrophage polarization at the tendon-bone interface, and upregulate the TNF signaling pathway in macrophages to promote M1 polarization.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Obesity and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscle are associated with poor healing of rotator cuff tears. In this study, the effect of leptin, an adipose factor, on tendon-bone healing and the underlying mechanism were explored. Future studies might focus on developing novel approaches to improve the tendon-bone healing in patients with obesity by targeting leptin or the TNF signaling pathway with the aid of biomaterials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff tears are common, affecting more than 60% of individuals older than 80 years, and they have been implicated in 70% of patients with shoulder pain. M1 polarization-related inflammation has been reported to be associated with poor healing outcomes of rotator cuff injury, and leptin, an adipokine, has been reported to be a potential activator of inflammation. However, whether leptin affects rotator cuff repair remains unknown.

Questions/purposes: Using in vitro cell experiments and an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model, we therefore asked: (1) Does leptin promote the M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro and in vivo? (2) Does leptin impair biomechanical strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, bone mineral density (BMD), or gait in the rotator cuff tear scenario? (3) Does leptin promote M1 polarization by upregulating the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) pathway?

Methods: The impact of leptin on M1 macrophage polarization in vitro was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the Western blot test, and immunofluorescence staining. The effect of leptin on tendon-bone healing was assessed in an in vivo rat rotator cuff tear model by comparing a leptin group with a suture group in terms of gait, biomechanical tensile strength, the histologic structure of the tendon-bone interface, and BMD. In the in vivo experiments, 8-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were used, adapting a previously developed rat rotator cuff tear model. The supraspinatus tendon was resected from the greater tuberosity bilaterally, and then the tendon was secured to its anatomical footprint using the transosseous single-row technique. In total, 30 rats were randomized into two groups (suture, leptin) by drawing lots (15 rats in each group). They were assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the surgery. In the suture group, 100 µL of normal saline was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. In the leptin group, 100 µL of leptin solution (200 ng/mL) was injected into the subacromial space after the deltoid muscle was restitched to the original position. Biomechanical properties including maximal failure load, stiffness, and tensile failure stress were determined to assess the biomechanical strength at 4 and 8 weeks after the surgery. Histologic staining was conducted to compare the structure of the tendon-bone interface between treatment groups. Micro-MRI and micro-CT assessments were conducted to compare the overall healing outcome and BMD between treatment groups. Gait analysis was conducted to compare the stride length and strength between treatment groups. M1 macrophage polarization in vivo at the tendon-bone interface was assessed by immunofluorescence staining. Finally, to explore the underlying mechanism of the effects of leptin, Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) was used to block the TNF signaling pathway in the in vitro macrophage study, and RT-PCR and Western blot were used to explore the underlying mechanism.

Results: Leptin enhanced LPS-induced M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro, showing increased gene expression of CD86, Nos2, and TNF-α as well as increased protein expression of CD86, TNF-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and inducible NO synthase (iNOS). The in vivo polarization showed that the M1 polarization of macrophages at the tendon-bone interface was promoted. At 2 weeks postoperatively, there were more M1 cells in the leptin group (53 ± 5 versus 77 ± 8, mean difference 24 [95% confidence interval (CI) 11 to 37]; p = 0.002), although the proportion of M1 cells (ratio of the number of M1 cells to the total number of macrophages) was not higher (18.6% ± 2.9% versus 21.5% ± 1.7%, mean difference 2.9% [95% CI -2.8% to 8.7%]; p = 0.36). At 4 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group exhibited more M1 cells (31 ± 4 versus 50 ± 6, mean difference 19 [95% CI 6 to 32]; p = 0.008) and at a higher proportion (16.4% ± 2.6% versus 23.0% ± 3.0%, mean difference 6.6% [95% CI 0.8% to 12.4%]; p = 0.03). The in vivo experiments showed that leptin impaired tendon-bone healing. At 4 weeks postoperatively, the biomechanical properties of both groups were not different in terms of maximal failure load (12.7 ± 1.6 N versus 12.4 ± 1.8 N, mean difference -0.3 N [95% CI -2.6 to 1.8]; p = 0.91), stiffness (5.1 ± 0.7 N/mm versus 4.6 ± 0.8 N/mm, mean difference -0.5 N/mm [95% CI -1.3 to 0.5]; p = 0.44), and tensile failure stress (2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm2 versus 2.0 ± 0.3 N/mm2, mean difference 0.0 N/mm2 [95% CI -0.4 to 0.4]; p = 0.99). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the leptin group showed worse maximal failure load (17.6 ± 1.4 N versus 14.1 ± 1.4 N, mean difference -3.5 N [95% CI -5.7 to -1.3]; p = 0.002), stiffness (7.0 ± 0.6 N/mm versus 5.2 ± 0.6 N/mm, mean difference -1.8 N/mm [95% CI -2.7 to -0.9]; p < 0.001), and tensile failure stress (3.4 ± 0.3 N/mm2 versus 2.8 ± 0.4 N/mm2, mean difference -0.6 N/mm2 [95% CI -1.0 to -0.2]; p = 0.007). Results of histologic staining, image assessments, and gait analysis also demonstrated that leptin impaired the healing process. In vitro experiments showed that leptin upregulated the gene expression of molecules in the TNF pathway, including CCL2 and receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), and M1 markers, such as TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2; the addition of Nec-1 neutralized the effect of leptin on macrophage polarization, reducing the expression of M1 markers, including TNF-α, CD86, and Nos2, and blocking the TNF signaling pathway, including CCL2 and RIPK. The protein expression exhibited similar trends.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, leptin appears to impair tendon-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff tear, promote M1 macrophage polarization at the tendon-bone interface, and upregulate the TNF signaling pathway in macrophages to promote M1 polarization.

Clinical relevance: Obesity and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscle are associated with poor healing of rotator cuff tears. In this study, the effect of leptin, an adipose factor, on tendon-bone healing and the underlying mechanism were explored. Future studies might focus on developing novel approaches to improve the tendon-bone healing in patients with obesity by targeting leptin or the TNF signaling pathway with the aid of biomaterials.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
722
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge. CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信