Henian Chen, Jinyong Pang, Yayi Zhao, Biwei Cao, Matthew J Valente, Weiliang Cen, Elena Valkanova
{"title":"Investigating started sample size, completed sample size and drop-out rate in 10 252 phase III clinical trials: Insights from ClinicalTrials.gov.","authors":"Henian Chen, Jinyong Pang, Yayi Zhao, Biwei Cao, Matthew J Valente, Weiliang Cen, Elena Valkanova","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study investigated the started sample size, completed sample size and drop-out rate of 10 252 published and unpublished phase III clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search on ClinicalTrials.gov for all phase III clinical trials with registered results before 26 May 2023. We retrieved and downloaded 10 252, which covered a period of more than 20 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 10 252 trials analysed, 889 (8.7%) were sponsored by the US National Institutes of Health/US Federal agencies (NIH/US Fed), 8429 (82.2%) were sponsored by industry. The overall median started sample size was 302. The overall median completed sample size was 228. The median completed sample sizes were 258 for industry-sponsored trials, and 194 for NIH/US Fed-sponsored trials. The median completed sample sizes were 321 for biological interventions and 223 for drug interventions. The overall median drop-out rate was 11%. Statistically significant differences were observed in sample sizes between industry-sponsored trials and NIH/US Fed-sponsored trials (P < 0.0001). Neither the started sample sizes nor the completed sample sizes have shown any change over the course of the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that a majority of the analysed trials lack sufficient statistical power (80%) to detect small effect sizes, and approximately half of the trials did not have 80% power to detect medium effect sizes. Notably, trials funded by NIH/US Fed exhibit significantly smaller sample sizes compared to trials sponsored by industry. When conducting sample size calculations for clinical trials, it is crucial to consider the anticipated effect size, variability and drop-out rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: This study investigated the started sample size, completed sample size and drop-out rate of 10 252 published and unpublished phase III clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov over the past 20 years.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search on ClinicalTrials.gov for all phase III clinical trials with registered results before 26 May 2023. We retrieved and downloaded 10 252, which covered a period of more than 20 years.
Results: Out of the 10 252 trials analysed, 889 (8.7%) were sponsored by the US National Institutes of Health/US Federal agencies (NIH/US Fed), 8429 (82.2%) were sponsored by industry. The overall median started sample size was 302. The overall median completed sample size was 228. The median completed sample sizes were 258 for industry-sponsored trials, and 194 for NIH/US Fed-sponsored trials. The median completed sample sizes were 321 for biological interventions and 223 for drug interventions. The overall median drop-out rate was 11%. Statistically significant differences were observed in sample sizes between industry-sponsored trials and NIH/US Fed-sponsored trials (P < 0.0001). Neither the started sample sizes nor the completed sample sizes have shown any change over the course of the past 20 years.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a majority of the analysed trials lack sufficient statistical power (80%) to detect small effect sizes, and approximately half of the trials did not have 80% power to detect medium effect sizes. Notably, trials funded by NIH/US Fed exhibit significantly smaller sample sizes compared to trials sponsored by industry. When conducting sample size calculations for clinical trials, it is crucial to consider the anticipated effect size, variability and drop-out rate.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.