Effective strategies for reducing patient length of stay in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
German Devia Jaramillo, Nathalia Esmeral Zuluaga, Viviana Andrea Velandia Avellaneda
{"title":"Effective strategies for reducing patient length of stay in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"German Devia Jaramillo, Nathalia Esmeral Zuluaga, Viviana Andrea Velandia Avellaneda","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01163-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overcrowding is a common issue in emergency departments worldwide. One condition associated with overcrowding is the Emergency Department Length of Stay(EDLOS). Prolonged EDLOS is linked to increased hospitalization costs, worsening clinical outcomes, and deterioration in patient-reported outcomes. Consequently, there is a need to reduce EDLOS, and the scientific literature reports multiple strategies aimed at this goal. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine strategies statistically significant in reducing the EDLOS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) database, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2024. Studies that included patient care strategies in emergency departments to reduce EDLOS, in adults or pediatric populations, and observational or experimental studies were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool for Interventional Studies, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. A mean difference analysis in minutes was performed using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3410 studies were identified using the search strategy with a total of 245,404 patients were analyzed. Three types of strategies were identified with results in reducing EDLOS. Interventions performed by physicians in the triage area (liaison, supervision, and advanced triage) showed a significant reduction of -21.87 min (95% CI -28.35; -15.38). The second intervention was the use of Point-of-Care Testing, which showed a reduction of -41.98 min (95% CI -98.13; 14.15). The third intervention was the creation of fast-track strategies, which documented a reduction of -21.81 min (95% CI -41.79; -1.83). Most of the studies were of the before-and-after type. The certainty of the evidence for the first intervention was moderate, while for the other two groups, it was considered low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of a physician in the triage team demonstrated a reduction in patient EDLOS, although with high heterogeneity among the analyzed studies. Similarly, the use of fast-track strategies is also significantly useful in reducing EDLOS, while POCT reduces EDLOS but not significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01163-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Overcrowding is a common issue in emergency departments worldwide. One condition associated with overcrowding is the Emergency Department Length of Stay(EDLOS). Prolonged EDLOS is linked to increased hospitalization costs, worsening clinical outcomes, and deterioration in patient-reported outcomes. Consequently, there is a need to reduce EDLOS, and the scientific literature reports multiple strategies aimed at this goal. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine strategies statistically significant in reducing the EDLOS.

Method: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) database, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2024. Studies that included patient care strategies in emergency departments to reduce EDLOS, in adults or pediatric populations, and observational or experimental studies were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool for Interventional Studies, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. A mean difference analysis in minutes was performed using a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 3410 studies were identified using the search strategy with a total of 245,404 patients were analyzed. Three types of strategies were identified with results in reducing EDLOS. Interventions performed by physicians in the triage area (liaison, supervision, and advanced triage) showed a significant reduction of -21.87 min (95% CI -28.35; -15.38). The second intervention was the use of Point-of-Care Testing, which showed a reduction of -41.98 min (95% CI -98.13; 14.15). The third intervention was the creation of fast-track strategies, which documented a reduction of -21.81 min (95% CI -41.79; -1.83). Most of the studies were of the before-and-after type. The certainty of the evidence for the first intervention was moderate, while for the other two groups, it was considered low.

Conclusion: The presence of a physician in the triage team demonstrated a reduction in patient EDLOS, although with high heterogeneity among the analyzed studies. Similarly, the use of fast-track strategies is also significantly useful in reducing EDLOS, while POCT reduces EDLOS but not significantly.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信