The application of reinforced endotracheal tubes with pressure indicators in preventing postoperative airway-related complications in neurosurgical patients: a randomized controlled study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Xiaoqin Guan, Ying Tian, Jiaqi Yang, Yingying Jiang, Xiaoqin Luo, Yu Li, Chan Chen
{"title":"The application of reinforced endotracheal tubes with pressure indicators in preventing postoperative airway-related complications in neurosurgical patients: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Xiaoqin Guan, Ying Tian, Jiaqi Yang, Yingying Jiang, Xiaoqin Luo, Yu Li, Chan Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02967-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive cuff pressure can lead to complications associated with endotracheal intubation. This study aims to compare the effects of cuff inflation guided by a pressure indicator versus the tactile estimation method on postoperative airway-related complications in neurosurgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled design. Blinding was implemented for the subjects and data collectors. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group used tracheal tubes with pressure indicators. The control group used standard reinforced tracheal tubes. The primary outcome measure was the score of tracheal mucosal injury in two groups of subjects under bronchoscopy assistance with extubation. Secondary outcome measures included: (1) the incidence of tracheal mucosal injury assessed by bronchoscopy at the time of extubation; (2) the incidence of blood-stained cuff during extubation; (3) the incidence and severity of sore throat, and the incidence of hoarseness, blood-stained sputum, and coughing at 1 h and 24 h post-extubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower tracheal mucosal injury score before extubation compared to controls (1.4 ± 0.274 vs. 2.7 ± 0.335; P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in immediate post-extubation complications or short-term (1-hour) postoperative symptoms. Notably, while the majority of 24-hour post-extubation outcomes remained comparable between groups, the intervention group exhibited significantly reduced sore throat severity at this timepoint (P = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of tracheal tubes with pressure indicators to control intraoperative cuff pressure could reduce postoperative airway mucosal damage in neurosurgical patients and alleviated post-extubation pharyngeal pain after 24 h.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2200065315, first registered on 02/11/2022. The study was retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02967-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excessive cuff pressure can lead to complications associated with endotracheal intubation. This study aims to compare the effects of cuff inflation guided by a pressure indicator versus the tactile estimation method on postoperative airway-related complications in neurosurgical patients.

Methods: This study employed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled design. Blinding was implemented for the subjects and data collectors. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group used tracheal tubes with pressure indicators. The control group used standard reinforced tracheal tubes. The primary outcome measure was the score of tracheal mucosal injury in two groups of subjects under bronchoscopy assistance with extubation. Secondary outcome measures included: (1) the incidence of tracheal mucosal injury assessed by bronchoscopy at the time of extubation; (2) the incidence of blood-stained cuff during extubation; (3) the incidence and severity of sore throat, and the incidence of hoarseness, blood-stained sputum, and coughing at 1 h and 24 h post-extubation.

Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower tracheal mucosal injury score before extubation compared to controls (1.4 ± 0.274 vs. 2.7 ± 0.335; P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in immediate post-extubation complications or short-term (1-hour) postoperative symptoms. Notably, while the majority of 24-hour post-extubation outcomes remained comparable between groups, the intervention group exhibited significantly reduced sore throat severity at this timepoint (P = 0.044).

Conclusion: The use of tracheal tubes with pressure indicators to control intraoperative cuff pressure could reduce postoperative airway mucosal damage in neurosurgical patients and alleviated post-extubation pharyngeal pain after 24 h.

Trial registration: ChiCTR2200065315, first registered on 02/11/2022. The study was retrospectively registered.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信