Alexander E. Stott, Raphael F. Garcia, Naomi Murdoch, David Mimoun, Mélanie Drilleau, Claire Newman, Aymeric Spiga, Don Banfield, Mark Lemmon, Sara Navarro, Luis Mora-Sotomayor, Constantinos Charalambous, William T. Pike, Philippe Lognonné, William B. Banerdt
{"title":"WindSightNet: The Inter-Annual Variability of Martian Winds Retrieved From InSight's Seismic Data With Machine Learning","authors":"Alexander E. Stott, Raphael F. Garcia, Naomi Murdoch, David Mimoun, Mélanie Drilleau, Claire Newman, Aymeric Spiga, Don Banfield, Mark Lemmon, Sara Navarro, Luis Mora-Sotomayor, Constantinos Charalambous, William T. Pike, Philippe Lognonné, William B. Banerdt","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wind measurements from landed missions on Mars are vital to characterize the near surface atmospheric behavior on Mars and improve atmospheric models. These winds are responsible for aeolian change and the mixing of dust in and out of the atmosphere, which has a significant effect on global circulation. The NASA InSight mission recorded wind data for around 750 sols. The seismometer, however, recorded data for around 1400 sols. The dominant source of energy in the seismic data is in fact due to winds. To this end, we propose a machine learning model, dubbed WindSightNet, to map the seismic data to wind speed and direction. The trained network achieves wind speed and direction measurements with errors of 0.932 m/s and 32.6°. We use WindSightNet to retrieve winds from the entire time the seismometer was recording to compare year-to-year wind variations at InSight. The continuous nature of the data set enables the extraction of periodic behavior. We observe a pattern of waves due to baroclinic activity with periods of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>2–3, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>4, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>5–7 and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>9–20 sols occurring <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${L}_{s}=$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>180–360°. We also observe periodicity during the day due to convective cells. This is used to estimate the boundary layer height, yielding values between 2.3 and 7.7 km. A data-science based metric is proposed to provide a quantification of the year-to-year differences in the wind speeds. This highlights variations linked to dust activity as well as other transient differences. On the whole, the seismic-derived winds confirm the dominance of the global circulation leading to repeatable weather patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008695","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008695","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wind measurements from landed missions on Mars are vital to characterize the near surface atmospheric behavior on Mars and improve atmospheric models. These winds are responsible for aeolian change and the mixing of dust in and out of the atmosphere, which has a significant effect on global circulation. The NASA InSight mission recorded wind data for around 750 sols. The seismometer, however, recorded data for around 1400 sols. The dominant source of energy in the seismic data is in fact due to winds. To this end, we propose a machine learning model, dubbed WindSightNet, to map the seismic data to wind speed and direction. The trained network achieves wind speed and direction measurements with errors of 0.932 m/s and 32.6°. We use WindSightNet to retrieve winds from the entire time the seismometer was recording to compare year-to-year wind variations at InSight. The continuous nature of the data set enables the extraction of periodic behavior. We observe a pattern of waves due to baroclinic activity with periods of 2–3, 4, 5–7 and 9–20 sols occurring 180–360°. We also observe periodicity during the day due to convective cells. This is used to estimate the boundary layer height, yielding values between 2.3 and 7.7 km. A data-science based metric is proposed to provide a quantification of the year-to-year differences in the wind speeds. This highlights variations linked to dust activity as well as other transient differences. On the whole, the seismic-derived winds confirm the dominance of the global circulation leading to repeatable weather patterns.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.