Pulmonary artery enlargement as a predictor of long-term prognosis in patients with resected early-stage non–small cell lung cancer

Megumi Nishikubo MD , Sanae Kuroda MD , Nanase Haga MD , Yuki Nishioka MD , Nahoko Shimizu MD, PhD , Yuko Fukuda MD, PhD , Wataru Nishio MD, PhD
{"title":"Pulmonary artery enlargement as a predictor of long-term prognosis in patients with resected early-stage non–small cell lung cancer","authors":"Megumi Nishikubo MD ,&nbsp;Sanae Kuroda MD ,&nbsp;Nanase Haga MD ,&nbsp;Yuki Nishioka MD ,&nbsp;Nahoko Shimizu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuko Fukuda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Wataru Nishio MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Although several studies have highlighted the potential prognostic value of computed tomography-measured pulmonary artery enlargement in various respiratory diseases, the long-term outcomes following lung cancer surgery remain unexplored. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of pulmonary artery enlargement for overall survival in patients with completely resected non–small cell lung cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively identified patients with pathological Tis-1cN0M0 non–small cell lung cancer who underwent complete resection between 2013 and 2018 in our hospital. We reviewed the routine preoperative computed tomography images and measured the pulmonary artery diameter at the bifurcation (PA) and the ascending aorta diameter (A) to calculate the PA/A ratio. Based on a PA/A threshold of 0.8, patients were categorized into high- and low-ratio groups, and their overall survival and cumulative incidence of cause-specific deaths were compared after propensity score matching.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 319 included patients, 116 were categorized into the high-ratio group and 203 into the low-ratio group. After propensity score matching, overall survival was significantly worse in the high-ratio group than in the low-ratio group (5-year overall survival: 89.4% vs 96.2%; <em>P</em> = .006). The high-ratio group had a significantly higher incidence of death not related to lung cancer than the low-ratio group (<em>P</em> = .01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with resected early-stage non–small cell lung cancer, those with preoperatively pulmonary artery enlargement had a poorer overall survival than those without, possibly attributed to a higher non-lung cancer-related death incidence. Measuring the preoperative PA/A ratio might be a useful tool for risk stratification, and selecting sublobar resection for these patients could improve the long-term prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 266-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624003887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Although several studies have highlighted the potential prognostic value of computed tomography-measured pulmonary artery enlargement in various respiratory diseases, the long-term outcomes following lung cancer surgery remain unexplored. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of pulmonary artery enlargement for overall survival in patients with completely resected non–small cell lung cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients with pathological Tis-1cN0M0 non–small cell lung cancer who underwent complete resection between 2013 and 2018 in our hospital. We reviewed the routine preoperative computed tomography images and measured the pulmonary artery diameter at the bifurcation (PA) and the ascending aorta diameter (A) to calculate the PA/A ratio. Based on a PA/A threshold of 0.8, patients were categorized into high- and low-ratio groups, and their overall survival and cumulative incidence of cause-specific deaths were compared after propensity score matching.

Results

Of the 319 included patients, 116 were categorized into the high-ratio group and 203 into the low-ratio group. After propensity score matching, overall survival was significantly worse in the high-ratio group than in the low-ratio group (5-year overall survival: 89.4% vs 96.2%; P = .006). The high-ratio group had a significantly higher incidence of death not related to lung cancer than the low-ratio group (P = .01).

Conclusions

In patients with resected early-stage non–small cell lung cancer, those with preoperatively pulmonary artery enlargement had a poorer overall survival than those without, possibly attributed to a higher non-lung cancer-related death incidence. Measuring the preoperative PA/A ratio might be a useful tool for risk stratification, and selecting sublobar resection for these patients could improve the long-term prognosis.
肺动脉扩张作为切除的早期非小细胞肺癌患者长期预后的预测因子
虽然有几项研究强调了计算机断层扫描测量肺动脉扩张在各种呼吸系统疾病中的潜在预后价值,但肺癌手术后的长期结果仍未得到探讨。本研究旨在评估肺动脉扩张对完全切除的非小细胞肺癌患者总生存率的预测价值。方法回顾性分析我院2013年至2018年全部切除的病理性Tis-1cN0M0非小细胞肺癌患者。我们回顾了术前常规的计算机断层图像,测量了肺动脉分叉处的直径(PA)和升主动脉直径(A)来计算PA/A比值。在PA/ a阈值为0.8的基础上,将患者分为高比率组和低比率组,并在倾向评分匹配后比较其总生存率和累积原因特异性死亡发生率。结果319例患者中,高比率组116例,低比率组203例。倾向评分匹配后,高比值组的总生存率明显低于低比值组(5年总生存率:89.4% vs 96.2%;p = .006)。高比值组与肺癌无关的死亡发生率显著高于低比值组(P = 0.01)。结论在早期非小细胞肺癌切除术患者中,术前有肺动脉扩张的患者总生存率较低,可能与非肺癌相关死亡发生率较高有关。测量术前PA/A比值可能是危险分层的有用工具,对这些患者选择叶下切除术可以改善长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信