Elizabeth L. Norton MD, Akul Arora MD, Busra Cangut MD, MS, Divyaam Satija BS, Marc Titsworth BS, Rana-Armaghan Ahmad BS, Carol Ling MSc, PhD, Karen Kim MD, Shinichi Fukuhara MD, Himanshu J. Patel MD, Bo Yang MD, PhD
{"title":"Association of intraoperative transfusion of blood products with postoperative outcomes and midterm survival in acute type A aortic dissection repair","authors":"Elizabeth L. Norton MD, Akul Arora MD, Busra Cangut MD, MS, Divyaam Satija BS, Marc Titsworth BS, Rana-Armaghan Ahmad BS, Carol Ling MSc, PhD, Karen Kim MD, Shinichi Fukuhara MD, Himanshu J. Patel MD, Bo Yang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.10.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study objective was to evaluate the impact of intraoperative blood product on postoperative outcomes and midterm survival in acute type A aortic dissection repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing open acute type A aortic dissection repair from January 2010 to April 2020 were divided into 2 groups: patients receiving intraoperative blood products and no intraoperative blood products, with a final propensity-matched cohort of 90 matched pairs by matching sex, age, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin, coronary artery disease, renal failure, stroke, prior cardiac surgery, cardiogenic shock, cardiopulmonary bypass time, crossclamp time, peripheral vascular disease, and aortic insufficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients were similar in demographic and preoperative characteristics. The complexity of the surgery, including the extent of aortic root and arch repair, was similar between the groups. The intraoperative blood product group had longer intubation time (77 hours vs 44 hours, <em>P</em> = .023), longer postoperative (14 vs 10 days, <em>P</em> = .0001) and total (15 vs 10 days, <em>P</em> < .0001) length of stays, and a higher rate of acute renal failure postoperatively (16.7% vs 6.7%, <em>P</em> = .037). The 6-year survival was similar between the intraoperative blood product group and no intraoperative blood product group (76.5% vs 83.3%, <em>P</em> = .48). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model showed a statistically insignificant hazard ratio of 1.27 in the intraoperative blood product group for midterm mortality (95% CI, 0.64-2.54, <em>P</em> = .50).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Intraoperative blood product use during acute type A aortic dissection repair did not impact midterm survival but increased postoperative complications. Intraoperative blood product transfusion can be safely and cautiously used during acute type A aortic dissection repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624003784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The study objective was to evaluate the impact of intraoperative blood product on postoperative outcomes and midterm survival in acute type A aortic dissection repair.
Methods
Patients undergoing open acute type A aortic dissection repair from January 2010 to April 2020 were divided into 2 groups: patients receiving intraoperative blood products and no intraoperative blood products, with a final propensity-matched cohort of 90 matched pairs by matching sex, age, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin, coronary artery disease, renal failure, stroke, prior cardiac surgery, cardiogenic shock, cardiopulmonary bypass time, crossclamp time, peripheral vascular disease, and aortic insufficiency.
Results
Patients were similar in demographic and preoperative characteristics. The complexity of the surgery, including the extent of aortic root and arch repair, was similar between the groups. The intraoperative blood product group had longer intubation time (77 hours vs 44 hours, P = .023), longer postoperative (14 vs 10 days, P = .0001) and total (15 vs 10 days, P < .0001) length of stays, and a higher rate of acute renal failure postoperatively (16.7% vs 6.7%, P = .037). The 6-year survival was similar between the intraoperative blood product group and no intraoperative blood product group (76.5% vs 83.3%, P = .48). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model showed a statistically insignificant hazard ratio of 1.27 in the intraoperative blood product group for midterm mortality (95% CI, 0.64-2.54, P = .50).
Conclusions
Intraoperative blood product use during acute type A aortic dissection repair did not impact midterm survival but increased postoperative complications. Intraoperative blood product transfusion can be safely and cautiously used during acute type A aortic dissection repair.
目的评价术中血液制品对急性A型主动脉夹层修复术后预后和中期生存的影响。方法2010年1月~ 2020年4月行急性A型主动脉夹层开放性修复术的患者分为两组:接受术中血液制品和未接受术中血液制品的患者,通过配对的性别、年龄、体重指数、术前血红蛋白、冠状动脉疾病、肾衰竭、卒中、既往心脏手术、心源性休克、体外循环时间、交叉钳时间、外周血管疾病、主动脉不全,最终形成90对倾向匹配队列。结果患者的人口学特征和术前特征相似。手术的复杂性,包括主动脉根部的范围和弓的修复,在两组之间是相似的。术中血制品组插管时间较长(77小时比44小时,P = 0.023),术后插管时间较长(14天比10天,P = 0.0001),总插管时间较长(15天比10天,P <;(0.0001)住院时间,术后急性肾功能衰竭发生率较高(16.7% vs 6.7%, P = 0.037)。术中血制品组与无术中血制品组6年生存率相似(76.5% vs 83.3%, P = 0.48)。多因素Cox比例风险模型显示,术中血制品组中期死亡率的风险比为1.27,差异无统计学意义(95% CI, 0.64-2.54, P = 0.50)。结论急性A型主动脉夹层修复术中使用术中血液制品对中期生存无影响,但增加了术后并发症。急性A型主动脉夹层修复术中输血是安全、谨慎的。