External validation of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Danial Ahmad MD, MPH , Derek Serna-Gallegos MD, FACS , Ariana Jackson BS , David J. Kaczorowski MD , Johannes Bonatti MD , David M. West MD , Pyongsoo D. Yoon MD , Danny Chu MD , Joe Squire MSN, RN , Floyd Thoma BS , Jianhui Zhu PhD , Julie Phillippi PhD , Ibrahim Sultan MD
{"title":"External validation of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection","authors":"Danial Ahmad MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Derek Serna-Gallegos MD, FACS ,&nbsp;Ariana Jackson BS ,&nbsp;David J. Kaczorowski MD ,&nbsp;Johannes Bonatti MD ,&nbsp;David M. West MD ,&nbsp;Pyongsoo D. Yoon MD ,&nbsp;Danny Chu MD ,&nbsp;Joe Squire MSN, RN ,&nbsp;Floyd Thoma BS ,&nbsp;Jianhui Zhu PhD ,&nbsp;Julie Phillippi PhD ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Sultan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality compared with routine cardiac surgical procedures. The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score has been recommended for use as a mortality risk-stratification tool in recent guidelines. We sought to externally validate this score in our local population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection from 2007 to 2021 were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed. Model discrimination was assessed by C-statistic with 95% CIs as part of the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Model performance was visualized by calibration plot and quantified by the Brier score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 587 patients were included. The mean age was 61 years (±13.5), with 42.08% of patients aged more than 65 years; 40.37% were female. The mean circulatory arrest time was 30.9 minutes (±16.5). Hemiarch replacement was performed in 62% of patients, and total arch replacement was performed in 35.3% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was observed in 66 patients (11.24%), and stroke was present in 7.16% of patients. The C-statistic revealed good discriminatory ability for predicting 30-day mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.79; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Model calibration was good (Brier score = 0.094).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score for 30-day mortality showed good discriminatory ability in our local population along with good ability for prediction of mortality, indicating its potential clinical utility in the population with acute type A aortic dissection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 81-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266627362400442X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality compared with routine cardiac surgical procedures. The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score has been recommended for use as a mortality risk-stratification tool in recent guidelines. We sought to externally validate this score in our local population.

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection from 2007 to 2021 were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed. Model discrimination was assessed by C-statistic with 95% CIs as part of the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Model performance was visualized by calibration plot and quantified by the Brier score.

Results

A total of 587 patients were included. The mean age was 61 years (±13.5), with 42.08% of patients aged more than 65 years; 40.37% were female. The mean circulatory arrest time was 30.9 minutes (±16.5). Hemiarch replacement was performed in 62% of patients, and total arch replacement was performed in 35.3% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was observed in 66 patients (11.24%), and stroke was present in 7.16% of patients. The C-statistic revealed good discriminatory ability for predicting 30-day mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.79; P < .0001). Model calibration was good (Brier score = 0.094).

Conclusions

The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score for 30-day mortality showed good discriminatory ability in our local population along with good ability for prediction of mortality, indicating its potential clinical utility in the population with acute type A aortic dissection.
接受急性A型主动脉夹层手术的患者的德国急性主动脉夹层登记A型评分的外部验证
目的与常规心脏外科手术相比,急性A型主动脉夹层手术具有较高的发病率和死亡率。在最近的指南中,德国急性主动脉夹层A型评分被推荐作为死亡率风险分层工具。我们试图在当地人群中进行外部验证。方法纳入2007 - 2021年连续接受急性A型主动脉夹层手术治疗的患者。进行逻辑回归分析。模型判别用c统计量进行评估,95% ci作为受试者工作特征分析的一部分。模型性能通过校正图可视化,并通过Brier评分量化。结果共纳入587例患者。平均年龄61岁(±13.5岁),65岁以上患者占42.08%;女性占40.37%。平均循环停止时间为30.9分钟(±16.5)。62%的患者行足弓置换,35.3%的患者行全足弓置换。30天死亡66例(11.24%),卒中发生率7.16%。c统计量对预测30天死亡率具有较好的判别能力(受试者工作特征曲线下面积,0.73;95% ci, 0.67-0.79;P & lt;。)。模型校正良好(Brier评分= 0.094)。结论德国急性主动脉夹层A型评分的30天死亡率在我们当地人群中具有良好的区分能力和较好的死亡率预测能力,表明其在急性A型主动脉夹层人群中具有潜在的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信