Repeated interval random frog (RIRF) algorithm based on FTIR and application to quantitative analysis of serum proteins

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Yansong Yue , Ruojing Zhang , Yuxiang Yang , Zhushanying Zhang , Yuan Gao , Huimin Cao
{"title":"Repeated interval random frog (RIRF) algorithm based on FTIR and application to quantitative analysis of serum proteins","authors":"Yansong Yue ,&nbsp;Ruojing Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuxiang Yang ,&nbsp;Zhushanying Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuan Gao ,&nbsp;Huimin Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Infrared spectroscopy is widely used for biomarker detection due to its non-invasive, rapid, and sensitive nature, but current methods exhibit limited stability in feature band extraction. This study introduces the repeated interval random frog (RIRF) algorithm to optimize protein feature band extraction in serum. The FTIR spectra of 66 collected blood samples were used for the study, and the IRF algorithm was run several times in order to obtain different subsets of feature variables. The feature bands in these subsets were then analyzed and selected for fusion with high contribution to protein content prediction. The feature bands with high contribution rate and high stability were finally extracted, which in turn improved the prediction accuracy of the quantitative model. In comparative analysis, RIRF outperformed IRF, CARS, SPA, and UVE for apolipoprotein B extraction, increasing the training correlation coefficient (<em>R</em>c) and prediction correlation coefficient (<em>R</em>p) to 0.9144 and 0.8504, respectively, while reducing feature numbers from 137 to 77. Additionally, feature fusion of albumin, apolipoprotein, C-reactive protein, total protein, and immunoglobulin A showed significant improvements in model predictive power. The <em>R</em>p of albumin was improved from 0.9515 to 0.9601 for the single best extraction; the <em>R</em>p of apolipoprotein A1 was improved from 0.6526 to 0.7312; the <em>R</em>p of C-reactive protein was improved from 0.7532 to 0.8214; and the <em>R</em>p of total protein was improved from 0.9595 to 0.9691. The RIRF algorithm significantly improves the prediction accuracy and provides an important reference in the application of biomarker detection and infrared spectral analysis techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55362,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 107730"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425002411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infrared spectroscopy is widely used for biomarker detection due to its non-invasive, rapid, and sensitive nature, but current methods exhibit limited stability in feature band extraction. This study introduces the repeated interval random frog (RIRF) algorithm to optimize protein feature band extraction in serum. The FTIR spectra of 66 collected blood samples were used for the study, and the IRF algorithm was run several times in order to obtain different subsets of feature variables. The feature bands in these subsets were then analyzed and selected for fusion with high contribution to protein content prediction. The feature bands with high contribution rate and high stability were finally extracted, which in turn improved the prediction accuracy of the quantitative model. In comparative analysis, RIRF outperformed IRF, CARS, SPA, and UVE for apolipoprotein B extraction, increasing the training correlation coefficient (Rc) and prediction correlation coefficient (Rp) to 0.9144 and 0.8504, respectively, while reducing feature numbers from 137 to 77. Additionally, feature fusion of albumin, apolipoprotein, C-reactive protein, total protein, and immunoglobulin A showed significant improvements in model predictive power. The Rp of albumin was improved from 0.9515 to 0.9601 for the single best extraction; the Rp of apolipoprotein A1 was improved from 0.6526 to 0.7312; the Rp of C-reactive protein was improved from 0.7532 to 0.8214; and the Rp of total protein was improved from 0.9595 to 0.9691. The RIRF algorithm significantly improves the prediction accuracy and provides an important reference in the application of biomarker detection and infrared spectral analysis techniques.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
13.70%
发文量
822
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Signal Processing and Control aims to provide a cross-disciplinary international forum for the interchange of information on research in the measurement and analysis of signals and images in clinical medicine and the biological sciences. Emphasis is placed on contributions dealing with the practical, applications-led research on the use of methods and devices in clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring and management. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control reflects the main areas in which these methods are being used and developed at the interface of both engineering and clinical science. The scope of the journal is defined to include relevant review papers, technical notes, short communications and letters. Tutorial papers and special issues will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信