Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: Rising incidence, diagnostic delays, and the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors in hospitalized patients.

Bryce Schutte, Kalie Savage, Matthew Merwin, Matthew Morris, Rage Geringer, Danielle B Dilsaver, Robert W Plambeck, Nikhil Jagan
{"title":"Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: Rising incidence, diagnostic delays, and the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors in hospitalized patients.","authors":"Bryce Schutte, Kalie Savage, Matthew Merwin, Matthew Morris, Rage Geringer, Danielle B Dilsaver, Robert W Plambeck, Nikhil Jagan","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the setting of growing use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), little is known about the prevalence and impact of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (eDKA). We performed a retrospective analysis on patients with DKA in the Catholic Health Initiatives-Omaha Health system from 2018 to 2023. Among the 510 patients meeting inclusion criteria; 455 (89.2%) had traditional DKA and 55 (10.8%) had eDKA. SGLT2i use was more likely in eDKA patients (44.4% vs. 0.03%). Compared with traditional DKA, those with eDKA had a significantly longer time to diagnosis (388 vs. 166 min, p < .001) and duration of DKA (2772 vs. 2005 min, p = .007). However, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) were similar between both DKA groups (171 vs. 170 h; 3.43 vs. 3.37 days, respectively). The unique biochemical profile of eDKA likely delays diagnosis and treatment, ultimately leading to similar LOS despite eDKA patients having lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores. Because the proportion of eDKA is rising, hospitalists must have a heightened awareness of eDKA as SGLT2i use increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the setting of growing use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), little is known about the prevalence and impact of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (eDKA). We performed a retrospective analysis on patients with DKA in the Catholic Health Initiatives-Omaha Health system from 2018 to 2023. Among the 510 patients meeting inclusion criteria; 455 (89.2%) had traditional DKA and 55 (10.8%) had eDKA. SGLT2i use was more likely in eDKA patients (44.4% vs. 0.03%). Compared with traditional DKA, those with eDKA had a significantly longer time to diagnosis (388 vs. 166 min, p < .001) and duration of DKA (2772 vs. 2005 min, p = .007). However, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) were similar between both DKA groups (171 vs. 170 h; 3.43 vs. 3.37 days, respectively). The unique biochemical profile of eDKA likely delays diagnosis and treatment, ultimately leading to similar LOS despite eDKA patients having lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores. Because the proportion of eDKA is rising, hospitalists must have a heightened awareness of eDKA as SGLT2i use increases.

血糖型糖尿病酮症酸中毒:住院患者中SGLT2抑制剂的发病率上升、诊断延迟和影响
随着钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的使用越来越多,人们对血糖型糖尿病酮症酸中毒(eDKA)的患病率和影响知之甚少。我们对2018年至2023年天主教健康倡议-奥马哈卫生系统中的DKA患者进行了回顾性分析。在符合纳入标准的510例患者中;传统DKA 455例(89.2%),eDKA 55例(10.8%)。eDKA患者更可能使用SGLT2i (44.4% vs 0.03%)。与传统DKA相比,eDKA患者的诊断时间明显更长(388分钟对166分钟,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信