Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ruadh Kelly-Harrington, Sara Leitao, Keelin O'Donoghue, Caroline Dalton-O'Connor, Mary Donnelly, Claire Murray, Daniel Nuzum, Maeve O'Sullivan, Marita Hennessy
{"title":"Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature.","authors":"Ruadh Kelly-Harrington, Sara Leitao, Keelin O'Donoghue, Caroline Dalton-O'Connor, Mary Donnelly, Claire Murray, Daniel Nuzum, Maeve O'Sullivan, Marita Hennessy","doi":"10.1177/10519815241305007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the prevalence and impacts of pregnancy loss, there is a lack of statutory or workplace-based supports for workers experiencing pregnancy loss, especially before the point of viability. As reproductive and working ages overlap, workplaces can play a significant role in pregnancy loss experiences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to map the available literature on workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review following JBI Guidance and a pre-registered protocol. We searched eight academic databases/platforms, grey literature sources, and reference lists for eligible documents (2012-2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following title and abstract screening and full-text review, 48 records were included for analysis: 18 reports, 15 journal articles, 6 guides/codes of practice, 3 theses, 2 book/book chapters, and 4 other narrative records. Secondary research was the most common methodology employed (<i>n</i> = 16) followed by primary research (<i>n</i> = 14). Reports mainly originated from South-East Asia, while all empirical studies took place in high-income, English-speaking countries. Leave from work was the most discussed/important form of workplace support. Helpful organisational measures were also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review found a lack of empirical research on workplace supports and experiences of pregnancy loss. Further research is needed to understand experiences and develop and implement appropriate supports.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815241305007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241305007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the prevalence and impacts of pregnancy loss, there is a lack of statutory or workplace-based supports for workers experiencing pregnancy loss, especially before the point of viability. As reproductive and working ages overlap, workplaces can play a significant role in pregnancy loss experiences.

Objective: The aim of this study is to map the available literature on workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review following JBI Guidance and a pre-registered protocol. We searched eight academic databases/platforms, grey literature sources, and reference lists for eligible documents (2012-2022).

Results: Following title and abstract screening and full-text review, 48 records were included for analysis: 18 reports, 15 journal articles, 6 guides/codes of practice, 3 theses, 2 book/book chapters, and 4 other narrative records. Secondary research was the most common methodology employed (n = 16) followed by primary research (n = 14). Reports mainly originated from South-East Asia, while all empirical studies took place in high-income, English-speaking countries. Leave from work was the most discussed/important form of workplace support. Helpful organisational measures were also identified.

Conclusions: Our review found a lack of empirical research on workplace supports and experiences of pregnancy loss. Further research is needed to understand experiences and develop and implement appropriate supports.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信