[Surgical treatment after lesions of the superficial branch of the radial nerve - mid-term outcomes].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Maria Tsironis, Sandra Vossen
{"title":"[Surgical treatment after lesions of the superficial branch of the radial nerve - mid-term outcomes].","authors":"Maria Tsironis, Sandra Vossen","doi":"10.1055/a-2437-0678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment of lesions of the superficial radial nerve remains a challenge for surgeons and patients. For patients, such lesions are associated with a high level of suffering due to electrifying pain at the level of the injury as well as sensory dysfunction. Our data collected over a treatment period of 6 years are intended to give an overview of surgical methods, temporal progression and the corresponding outcomes.We retrospectively analysed 17 cases of patients undergoing surgery after a lesion of the superficial branch of the radial nerve between 4/2017 an 12/2022. Sixteen patients were surveyed using standardised measures with regard to regeneration, pain relief and post-surgical satisfaction. The average latency between the causal event and the surgical procedure was 13.4 months (3-60 M). Neurolysis was carried out in 4 of 16 cases in the presence of macroscopically visible cicatricial changes without the occurrence of morphological changes in the nerve and with preserved continuity. Reconstruction through suturing was performed in 12 cases, 4 being performed without and 8 with neuroprotection. In 2 of the latter, neuroprotection was achieved with a neurotube, while 6 were treated by means of wrapping veins.The performed interventions all led to a reduction of pain. Regardless of the time interval between the lesion of the superficial radial nerve and surgery, the procedure led to a relief from discomfort related to previous symptoms of pain, hypesthesia and Tinel sign. Although the reconstruction of the nerve did not lead to complete remission, the patients were satisfied with the results. In most cases, some hypesthesia remained. Neuroprotection through a vein graft led to better pain relief than treatment without a vein graft.Although symptoms remained, pain relief was crucial for the patients. After lesions of the superficial branch of the radial nerve, surgical treatment aiming to preserve or restore the continuity of the injured nerve branch should be considered as a promising option.</p>","PeriodicalId":55075,"journal":{"name":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","volume":"57 1","pages":"44-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2437-0678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment of lesions of the superficial radial nerve remains a challenge for surgeons and patients. For patients, such lesions are associated with a high level of suffering due to electrifying pain at the level of the injury as well as sensory dysfunction. Our data collected over a treatment period of 6 years are intended to give an overview of surgical methods, temporal progression and the corresponding outcomes.We retrospectively analysed 17 cases of patients undergoing surgery after a lesion of the superficial branch of the radial nerve between 4/2017 an 12/2022. Sixteen patients were surveyed using standardised measures with regard to regeneration, pain relief and post-surgical satisfaction. The average latency between the causal event and the surgical procedure was 13.4 months (3-60 M). Neurolysis was carried out in 4 of 16 cases in the presence of macroscopically visible cicatricial changes without the occurrence of morphological changes in the nerve and with preserved continuity. Reconstruction through suturing was performed in 12 cases, 4 being performed without and 8 with neuroprotection. In 2 of the latter, neuroprotection was achieved with a neurotube, while 6 were treated by means of wrapping veins.The performed interventions all led to a reduction of pain. Regardless of the time interval between the lesion of the superficial radial nerve and surgery, the procedure led to a relief from discomfort related to previous symptoms of pain, hypesthesia and Tinel sign. Although the reconstruction of the nerve did not lead to complete remission, the patients were satisfied with the results. In most cases, some hypesthesia remained. Neuroprotection through a vein graft led to better pain relief than treatment without a vein graft.Although symptoms remained, pain relief was crucial for the patients. After lesions of the superficial branch of the radial nerve, surgical treatment aiming to preserve or restore the continuity of the injured nerve branch should be considered as a promising option.

[桡神经浅支病变后的手术治疗-中期结果]。
桡浅神经病变的治疗对外科医生和患者来说仍然是一个挑战。对于患者来说,这种病变与损伤水平的电气化疼痛和感觉功能障碍引起的高度痛苦有关。我们收集了6年治疗期间的数据,旨在概述手术方法、颞叶进展和相应的结果。我们回顾性分析了2017年4月至2022年12月期间17例桡骨神经浅支病变后接受手术的患者。采用标准化措施对16例患者进行再生、疼痛缓解和术后满意度的调查。因果事件与手术之间的平均潜伏期为13.4个月(3-60 M)。16例患者中有4例在宏观可见瘢痕改变的情况下进行了神经松解术,未发生神经形态学改变,并保持了连续性。缝合重建12例,无神经保护4例,有神经保护8例。后者中有2例采用神经管进行神经保护,6例采用静脉包裹治疗。所有的干预措施都能减轻疼痛。无论桡骨浅神经病变与手术之间的时间间隔如何,该手术均可缓解与先前疼痛、感觉减退和Tinel体征相关的不适。虽然神经重建没有导致完全缓解,但患者对结果感到满意。在大多数情况下,仍然存在一些感觉减退。通过静脉移植的神经保护比不进行静脉移植的治疗更能缓解疼痛。尽管症状仍然存在,但缓解疼痛对患者至关重要。桡神经浅支病变后,手术治疗旨在保持或恢复损伤神经分支的连续性应被认为是一个有希望的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten finden Sie die neuesten Informationen über: Diagnostik Verfahrenswahl state of the art / neueste Techniken rekonstruktive Verfahren Behandlung infolge von Traumata oder OP Bewertung der Ergebnisse Klinische Forschung Interessante Darstellung der neuesten Erkenntnisse in Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten. Exzellent veranschaulicht durch ein klares Layout und reiche Bebilderung. Überzeugen Sie sich selbst! Organschaften Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Handchirurgie, Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie und Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft der Plastischen, Rekonstruktiven und Ästhetischen Chirurgen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信